Town planning for reconstruction after large-scale disasters that is led exclusively by the local government may be insufficient. However, it is also difficult to effectively incorporate citizen participation into planning because of insufficient government manpower and a lack of time among citizens. The present study surveys and analyzes a process of mutual coordination between a local government and citizens involved in town reconstruction planning after a large-scale disaster in order to understand how citizens’ participation in the early stages of the planning process for town reconstruction should be. A local study meeting in Miyako City is taken as a case example. As a method of incorporating citizen participation, it is found that the local study meeting was simple and effective method in obtaining consensus among local residents, but was not effective and may even have exacerbated disagreement regarding fundamental issues.

1. [1] H. Yoshino and M. Hino (Eds.), “Ima-wo-ikiru, Higashi Nihon Dai Shinsai kara Asu he! 5 Shizen to Kagaku,” Tohoku University Press, Sendai, 2013 (in Japanese).
2. [2] Y. Kishi, H. Koizumi, and S. Watanabe, “The Problems and the Efficacy of the Actual Recovery Process in the Post-Earthquake Land Readjustment Project Areas under “Two Step Planning Determination Procedure” in Matsumoto, Moriminami, Kobe City and Tsukiji, Amagasaki City,” Journal of the City Planning Institute of Japan, Vol.32, No.3, pp. 757-762, 1997 (in Japanese).
3. [3] K. Fukutome, “Relocation Factors of Settlements due to Disasters; in case of the 2004 Mid-Niigata Prefecture Earthquake,” Journal of the City Planning Institute of Japan, Vol.47, No.3, pp. 913-918, 2012 (in Japanese).
4. [4] T. Kariya and M. Ubaura, “A Study of the process of Community Participation in the Initial Stage of Reconstruction from Disaster, A case Study of Recovery Process from Tsunami Disaster in Ishinomaki City,” Journal of the City Planning Institute of Japan, Vol.48, No.3, pp. 837-842, 2013 (in Japanese).