Optimal Life Recovery Assistance for Those Who Are Residing in Designated Temporary Housing in Widely Dispersed Locations: Interim Findings on Different Household Groups and on Life Recovery Promotion Parameters

Shigeo Tatsuki

doi:10.20965/jdr.2015.p0939

single-dr.php

« previous

JDR Vol.10 No.5 pp. 939-947

(2015)

doi: 10.20965/jdr.2015.p0939

Paper:

Views over last 60 days: 750

Optimal Life Recovery Assistance for Those Who Are Residing in Designated Temporary Housing in Widely Dispersed Locations: Interim Findings on Different Household Groups and on Life Recovery Promotion Parameters

Shigeo Tatsuki

Department of Sociology, Doshisha University
Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto 602-8580, Japan

Received:

June 5, 2015

Accepted:

July 22, 2015

Published:

October 1, 2015

Keywords:

designated temporary housing, prefabricated temporary housing, seven critical elements model of life recovery, ethnography interview, community based participatory research

Abstract

Most persons whose houses were destroyed in the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake/tsunami disaster now reside in designated temporary housing (DTH). Unlike prefabricated temporary housing (PTH) occupants, DTH dwellers reside in widely dispersed locations. Japanese disaster research has mainly focused on life recovery assistance for PTH occupants who live in close proximity and not much is known about DHT residing “diaspora” survivors. This paper outlines a set of projects aimed at identifying 1) life recovery process characteristics among DTH occupants, 2) interrelationships between community rebuilding and individual life recovery processes of DTH dwellers, 3) connecting or reconnect such residents, and 4) managing individual life recovery by providing disaster case management services. We focused on interim findings about life recovery process studies based on ethnographic and community-based participatory research and implications regarding DTH residents’ valuations in terms of rank-ordering the seven critical elements (SCEs) for life recovery. We compare their situation to that of survivors of the 1995 Kobe earthquake.

Cite this article as:

S. Tatsuki, “Optimal Life Recovery Assistance for Those Who Are Residing in Designated Temporary Housing in Widely Dispersed Locations: Interim Findings on Different Household Groups and on Life Recovery Promotion Parameters,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.10 No.5, pp. 939-947, 2015.

Data files:

References

[1] S. Tanaka and K. Shigekawa, “Housing recovery processes of the temporary housing dwellers for the 2011 great east japan earthquake: Natori city case study,” Proc. of the 3^rd Int. Conf. on Urban Disaster Reduction, 2014.
[2] R. Kimura, “Recovery and Reconstruction Calendar,” Journal of Disaster Research, Vol.2, No.6, 2007.
[3] R. Kimura, K. Tomoyasu, Y. Yajima, H. Mashima, K. Furukawa, Y. Toda, K. Watanabe, and T. Kawahara, “Current Status and Issues of Life Recovery Process Three Years After the Great East Japan Earthquake Questionnaire Based on Subjective Estimate of Victims Using Life Recovery Calendar Method,” Journal of Disaster Research, Vol.9, No.sp, 2014.
[4] S. Tanaka and K. Shigekawa, “Life Recovery Process Analysis of Designated Temporary Housing Dwellers,” Proc. of the 36^th Institute of Social Safety Science Meeting, pp. 55-56, 2015.
[5] A. Matsukawa, A. Tsujioka, and S. Tatsuki, “Life recovery processes and the challenges of government-leased-private-rental-interim-housing (DTH) in wide dispersed areas: The 2013 grass-roots life recovery assessment workshop in Natori city in Miyagi prefecture,” Proc. of the 3^rd Int. Conf. on Urban Disaster Reduction, 2014.
[6] S. Nishisato, “Analysis of Categorical Data: Dual Scaling and Its Applications,” University of Toronto Press.
[7] A. Matsukawa, A. Tsujioka, and S. Tatsuki, “Life Recovery Processes and the Challenges of Four Types of Dwellers: Life Recovery Assessment Workshop in Natori City in Miyagi Prefecture,” Journal of Institute of Social Safety Science, Vol.25 (e-Journal), 2015, http://isss.jp.net/isss-site/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2014-035.pdf [retrieved June 5, 2015]
[8] S. Tatsuki and H. Hayashi, “Seven Critical Element Model of Life Recovery: General Linear Model Analyses of the 2001 Kobe Panel Survey Data,” US-Japan Cooperative Research for Urban Earthquake Disaster Mitigation 2^nd Workshop, 2002, http://www.drs.dpri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/us-japan/cd-2/ShigeoTatsuki.pdf [retrieved August 11, 2014]
[9] S. Tatsuki, “Long-term Life Recovery Processes among Survivors of the 1995 Kobe Earthquake: 1999, 2001, 2003, and 2005 Life Recovery Social Survey Results,” Journal of Disaster Research, Vol.2, No.6, pp. 484-501, 2007.

This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationa License.

[1] [1] S. Tanaka and K. Shigekawa, “Housing recovery processes of the temporary housing dwellers for the 2011 great east japan earthquake: Natori city case study,” Proc. of the 3^rd Int. Conf. on Urban Disaster Reduction, 2014.

[2] [2] R. Kimura, “Recovery and Reconstruction Calendar,” Journal of Disaster Research, Vol.2, No.6, 2007.

[3] [3] R. Kimura, K. Tomoyasu, Y. Yajima, H. Mashima, K. Furukawa, Y. Toda, K. Watanabe, and T. Kawahara, “Current Status and Issues of Life Recovery Process Three Years After the Great East Japan Earthquake Questionnaire Based on Subjective Estimate of Victims Using Life Recovery Calendar Method,” Journal of Disaster Research, Vol.9, No.sp, 2014.

[4] [4] S. Tanaka and K. Shigekawa, “Life Recovery Process Analysis of Designated Temporary Housing Dwellers,” Proc. of the 36^th Institute of Social Safety Science Meeting, pp. 55-56, 2015.

[5] [5] A. Matsukawa, A. Tsujioka, and S. Tatsuki, “Life recovery processes and the challenges of government-leased-private-rental-interim-housing (DTH) in wide dispersed areas: The 2013 grass-roots life recovery assessment workshop in Natori city in Miyagi prefecture,” Proc. of the 3^rd Int. Conf. on Urban Disaster Reduction, 2014.

[6] [6] S. Nishisato, “Analysis of Categorical Data: Dual Scaling and Its Applications,” University of Toronto Press.

[7] [7] A. Matsukawa, A. Tsujioka, and S. Tatsuki, “Life Recovery Processes and the Challenges of Four Types of Dwellers: Life Recovery Assessment Workshop in Natori City in Miyagi Prefecture,” Journal of Institute of Social Safety Science, Vol.25 (e-Journal), 2015, http://isss.jp.net/isss-site/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2014-035.pdf [retrieved June 5, 2015]

[8] [8] S. Tatsuki and H. Hayashi, “Seven Critical Element Model of Life Recovery: General Linear Model Analyses of the 2001 Kobe Panel Survey Data,” US-Japan Cooperative Research for Urban Earthquake Disaster Mitigation 2^nd Workshop, 2002, http://www.drs.dpri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/us-japan/cd-2/ShigeoTatsuki.pdf [retrieved August 11, 2014]

[9] [9] S. Tatsuki, “Long-term Life Recovery Processes among Survivors of the 1995 Kobe Earthquake: 1999, 2001, 2003, and 2005 Life Recovery Social Survey Results,” Journal of Disaster Research, Vol.2, No.6, pp. 484-501, 2007.