JDR Vol.9 No.4 pp. 475-483
doi: 10.20965/jdr.2014.p0475


Cropping Systems in Some Drought-Prone Communities of the Northern Region of Ghana: Factors Affecting the Introduction of Rice

Vincent Kodjo Avornyo*, Osamu Ito**,
Gordana Kranjac-Berisavljevic*, Osamu Saito**,
and Kazuhiko Takeuchi**

*Faculty of Agriculture, University for Development Studies (UDS), P.O. Box TL 1882, Tamale

**Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability (UNU-IAS), United Nations University, 53-70, Jingumae 5-chome, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo 150-8925, Japan

February 1, 2014
July 15, 2014
August 1, 2014
compound house, spatial diversification, principal component analysis, rice, cropping system

Despite the growing demand for rice in Ghana, domestic rice production remains low, resulting in the importation of about 70% of the rice consumed in Ghana. In spite of the fact that 39-47% of the 20-28% of Ghana’s total geographic area classified as inland valley wetlands is considered suitable for rice cultivation, less than 15% is presently being used. A household survey was therefore conducted in six communities, Fihini (F), Cheshegu (C), Dabogushei (D), Kpalgum (K), Zergua (Z), and Yoggu (Y), of the Tolon district in northern Ghana in order to identify factors affecting the introduction of rice into the cropping system. Maize, groundnut, rice, and yam were found to be the four major crops grown in the communities. Overall, 64% of respondents cultivate rice, but this figure is particularly low (30%) in F and Y communities. Rice is usually combined with two other major crops, most frequently maize and yam. In C, D, and K communities, about 90% of households cultivate at least, three out of the four major crops. The interview with farmers revealed that rice yield is 0.73 t/ha on average and significantly higher in K and C (1.06 t/ha and 0.93 t/ha, respectively) than in D (0.37 t/ha). The average distance from compound houses to rice and maize fields is significantly shorter in C, D, and K. Similarly, the rate of rice introduction in C, D, and K is higher than in F, Z, and Y, suggesting that distance to inland valleys may be one of the factors that influence the incorporation of rice into the cropping systems of these communities. Principal component analysis of crop yields and cattle number for the Y community revealed that rice growers tend to have higher crop productivity while cattle production is higher among non-rice growers. Within the community, the productivity of upland crops and balance between crop production and cattle production may be important factors that influence the incorporation of rice into the cropping system.

Cite this article as:
Vincent Kodjo Avornyo, Osamu Ito,
Gordana Kranjac-Berisavljevic, Osamu Saito, and
and Kazuhiko Takeuchi, “Cropping Systems in Some Drought-Prone Communities of the Northern Region of Ghana: Factors Affecting the Introduction of Rice,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.9, No.4, pp. 475-483, 2014.
Data files:
  1. [1] P. Roudier, B. Sultan, P. Quirion, and A. Berg, “The impact of future climate change on West African crop yields: What does the recent literature say?,” Global Environmental Change Vol.21, pp. 1073-1083, 2011.
  2. [2] A. Dazé, “Climate Change and Poverty in Ghana,” CARE Int., Accra, Ghana, 2007.
  3. [3] T. Deressa, R.M. Hassan, T. Alemu,M. Yesuf, and C. Ringler, “Analyzing the determinants of farmers’ choice of adaptation methods and perceptions of climate change in the Nile basin of Ethiopia,” IFPRI Discussion Paper 00798, Environment and Production Technology Division, Ethiopia, 2008.
  4. [4] A. Francis, “Future perspectives of multiple cropping,” In: A. Francis (Ed.), “Multiple Cropping System,” MacMillan Publishing Co., New York, pp. 351-369. 1986.
  5. [5] N. van Duivenbooden, M. Pala, C. Studer, C. L. Bielders, and D. J, Beukes, “Cropping systems and crop complementarity in dryland agriculture to increase soil water use efficiency: a review,” Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science, Vol.48, pp. 213-236, 2000.
  6. [6] Ministry of Food and Agriculture, “Agriculture in Ghana: Facts and Figures (2010). Accra, Ghana: Statistics Research and Information Directorate,” MOFA, 2011, [accessed July 15, 2014]
  7. [7] C. Ragasa, A. Dankyi, P. Acheampong, A. N. Wiredu, A. Chapoto, M. Asamoah, and R. Tripp, “Patterns of adoption of improved rice technologies in Ghana,” IFPRI WORKING PAPER 35, 2013, [accessed July 15, 2014]
  8. [8] M. Gumma, P. S. Thenkabail, H. Fujii, and R. Namara, “Spatial models for selecting the most suitable areas of rice cultivation in the inland valley wetlands of Ghana using remote sensing and geographic information systems,” Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, Vol.3, p. 033537, 2009.
  9. [9] Savanna Agriculture Research Institute (SARI), Agro meteorological Unit, Annual Report, No.15, 2001.
  10. [10] Hubeny distance calculation formula: [accessed July 15, 2014]
  11. [11] K. Waha, C. Müller, A. Bondeau, J. P. Dietrich, P. Kurukulasuriya, J. Heinke, and H. Lotze-Campen, “Adaptation to climate change through a choice of cropping system and sowing date in sub-Saharan Africa,” Global Environmental Change, Vol.23, pp. 130-143, 2012.
  12. [12] F. K. Obeng, “Things are hard for us but we see a way out of them Impact of climate variability on geographical and occupational mobility and the effects of mobility on social organization in farming communities in North-Eastern Ghana,” AMIDSt/Amsterdam Institute for Metropolitan and Int. Development Studies, Nieuwe Prinsengracht, Vol.130, 1018 VZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2005.
  13. [13] R.W. N. Yeboah, “Climate variability and small farmer’s economic decision making processes The case of Bongo District, Upper East Region, Ghana,” PhD Thesis, University of Ghana Legon, 2005.
  14. [14] J. A. Stanturf, M. L. Warren Jr., S. Charnley, S. C. Polasky, S. L. Goodrick, F. Armah, and Y. A. Nyako, “Ghana climate change vulnerability and adaptation assessment,” United States Agency for International Development (USAID), 2011,’ghana+climate+change+vulnerability+and+adaptation+assessment’ [accessed July 15, 2014]
  15. [15] E. Darko and L. Atazona, “Literature review of the impact of climate change on economic development in northern Ghana, opportunities and activities,” Overseas Development Institute, 2013, [accessed July 15, 2014]
  16. [16] International Fund for Agricultural Development, “Interim evaluation report of the upper east region land conservation and smallholder rehabilitation project (LACOSREP) – Phase II,” Republic of Ghana Report No.1757, 2006, [accessed on July 15, 2014]

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Mar. 05, 2021