single-dr.php

JDR Vol.8 No.5 pp. 941-961
(2013)
doi: 10.20965/jdr.2013.p0941

Paper:

Seismic Risk Evaluation on Building Damage of Municipalities Based on the Seismic Activity Model in National Seismic Hazard Maps for Japan

Masatsugu Wakaura*, Yasushi Komaru*, Satoshi Shimizu*,
Hiroyuki Fujiwara**, and Nobuyuki Morikawa**

*OYO RMS Corporation, 4-9-9 Akasaka, Minato-ku, Tokyo 107-0052, Japan

**National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention, 3-1,Tennodai, Tsukuba-shi, Ibaraki 305-0006, Japan

Received:
May 1, 2013
Accepted:
July 15, 2013
Published:
October 1, 2013
Keywords:
risk curve, spatial correlation, risk management
Abstract

Using the seismic activity model in the National Seismic Hazard Maps for Japan, risk curves were calculated for the exceedance probability in 30 years regarding building damage, i.e., the number of completely destroyed buildings, due to earthquake motion in municipalities throughout all of Japan. In calculation, building data were created using 250 m mesh, and loss functions of wooden and nonwooden buildings were set. Analysis was performed by constructing a methodology considering the spatial correlation of dispersion of earthquake hazards and dispersion based on the planer extension of municipalities. Furthermore, we show the usage of calculated risk curves, for selecting assumed earthquakes and quantitatively estimating aseismic effects of wooden buildings.

Cite this article as:
Masatsugu Wakaura, Yasushi Komaru, Satoshi Shimizu,
Hiroyuki Fujiwara, and Nobuyuki Morikawa, “Seismic Risk Evaluation on Building Damage of Municipalities Based on the Seismic Activity Model in National Seismic Hazard Maps for Japan,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.8, No.5, pp. 941-961, 2013.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] N. Nojima, H. Fujiwara, N. Morikawa, Y. Ishikawa, T. Okumura and J.Miyakoshi, “Seismic risk assessment of active faults in Japan in terms of population exposure to seismic intensity,” Journal of JAEE, Vol.10, No.2, pp. 22-40, May, 2010 (in Japanese).
  2. [2] Y. Komaru, S. Shimizu, H. Fujiwara, S. Kawai, N. Morikawa, H. Matsuyama, Y. Hayakawa, “Seismic risk analysis on building damages and human casualties based on seismic hazard of National Seismic Hazard Maps for Japan,” The 13th Japan Earthquake Engineering Symposium, pp. 2584-2591, Nov., 2010 (in Japanese).
  3. [3] Statistics Bureau of Japan, “The 2008 Housing and Land Survey” (in Japanese), http://www.stat.go.jp/data/jyutaku/2008/index.htm [accessed April 1, 2013]
  4. [4] O. Murao and F. Yamazaki, “Development of fragility curves for buildings based on damage survey data of a local government after the 1995 Hyogoken-Nanbu Earthquake,” J. Struct. Constr. Eng., AIJ, No.527, pp. 189-196, Jan., 2000 (in Japanese).
  5. [5] T. Nakashima and S. Okada, “Seismic strengthening strategy for wood frame dwellings targeting to minimize the death toll from a view point of temporal variation,” J. Struct. Constr. Eng., AIJ, No.623, pp. 79-86, Jan., 2008 (in Japanese).
  6. [6] Central Disaster Management Council, “On estimation of earthquake damage of the Tokyo metropolitan earthquake,” 2004 (in Japanese),
    http://www.bousai.go.jp/jishin/syuto/index.html [accessed April 1, 2013]
  7. [7] Statistics Bureau of Japan, “Japan Census,”
    http://www.stat.go.jp/data/index.htm [accessed April 1, 2013]
  8. [8] Statistics Bureau of Japan, “Housing and Land Survey,”
    http://www.stat.go.jp/data/jyutaku/kekka.htm [accessed April 1, 2013]
  9. [9] The Architectural Institute of Japan, “The strong motion record book of the 1995 Hyogoken-nambu earthquake,” 1996 (in Japanese).
  10. [10] NIED-EDM Kawasaki Laboratory, Special Project For Earthquake Disaster Mitigation in Urban Areas, Open Software, 2007,
    http://www.kedm.bosai.go.jp/japanese/daidaitoku/software.html [accessed April 1, 2013]
  11. [11] The Fire and Disaster Management Agency of Japan, Disaster Information,
    http://www.fdma.go.jp/ [accessed April 1, 2013]
  12. [12] The Headquarters for Earthquake Research Promotion, “National Seismic Hazard Maps for Japan (2010)” (in Japanese).
  13. [13] S. Midorikawa, K. Fujimoto, and I. Muramatsu, “Correlation of New J.M.A. Instrumental Seismic Intensity with Former J.M.A. Seismic Intensity and Ground Motion Parameters,” Journal of Social Safety Science, Vol.1, pp. 51-56, 1999 (in Japanese).
  14. [14] K. Fujimoto and S. Midorikawa, “Empirical Method for Estimating J.M.A. Instrumental Seismic Intensity from Ground Motion Parameters Using Strong Motion Records during Recent Major Earthquakes,” Journal of Social Safety Science, Vol.7, pp. 241-246, 2005 (in Japanese).
  15. [15] The Headquarters for Earthquake Research Promotion, “Consideration on future seismic hazard evaluation as of 2011 and 2012,” 2012 (in Japanese), http://www.jishin.go.jp/main/chousa/12_yosokuchizu/index.htm [accessed April 1, 2013]
  16. [16] H. Kambara and T. Takada, “Macro-spatial correlation of seismic ground motion,” Summaries of technical papers of annual meeting Architectural Institute of Japan, pp. 225-226, Sep., 1996 (in Japanese).
  17. [17] T. Takada and T. Shimomura, “Macro-spatial correlation of seismic ground motion on strong motion records of the 1999 Chi-Chi Earthquake,” J. Struct. Constr. Eng. AIJ, No.565, pp. 41-48, Mar., 2003 (in Japanese).
  18. [18] T. Hayashi, S. Fukushima, and H. Yashiro, “A study on spacial correlation between spectral accelation,” Proceedings of the annual conference of the Institute of Social Safety Science, No.18, pp. 103-106, May, 2006 (in Japanese).
  19. [19] I. Suetomi, E. Ishida, Y. Fukushima, R. Isoyama, and S. Sawada, “Mixing method of geomorphologic classification and borehole data for estimation of average shear-wave velocity and distribution of peak ground motion during the 2004 Niigata-Chuetsu Earthquake,” Journal of JAEE, Vol.7, No.3, pp. 1-12, May, 2007 (in Japanese).
  20. [20] A. Dempster, N. Laird, and D. Rubin, “Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 39, pp. 1-38, 1977.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Sep. 24, 2021