single-dr.php

JDR Vol.8 No.2 pp. 356-364
(2013)
doi: 10.20965/jdr.2013.p0356

Paper:

Urban Recovery Process in Pisco After the 2007 Peru Earthquake

Osamu Murao*1, Tomoyo Hoshi*1, Miguel Estrada*2,
Kazuya Sugiyasu*1, Masashi Matsuoka*3, and Fumio Yamazaki*4

*1Graduate School of Systems and Information Engineering, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8573, Japan

*2Japan-Peru Center for Earthquake Engineering Research and Disaster Mitigation (CISMID), National University of Engineering, Av. Tupac Amaru 1150, Rimac, Lima, Peru

*3Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 4259-G3-2, Nagatsuta, Midori-ku, Yokohama 226-8502, Japan

*4Department of Urban Environment Systems, Chiba University, 1-33 Yayoi-cho, Inage-ku, Chiba 263-8522, Japan

Received:
November 1, 2012
Accepted:
December 14, 2012
Published:
March 1, 2013
Keywords:
2007 Peru Earthquake, Pisco, urban recovery process, building examination, satellite image
Abstract

Post-disaster urban recovery is a significant matter in disaster management that represents government efforts after a disaster and victim satisfaction with these efforts in affected areas. Understanding the recovery process is a procedure necessary for evaluating government strategy. From this view, the authors dealt with the recovery process at Pisco, the area most devastated in the 2007 Peru Earthquake. Research was conducted through the following procedure: (1) a field survey including interviews was carried out in July 2012 to clarify post-earthquake conditions in urban Pisco, especially from the viewpoint of the physical environment, (2) recovery conditions were compared with damage conditions investigated by CISMID just after the event using satellite imaging and building recovery data obtained in the survey, and (3) post-earthquake recovery was quantitatively analyzed in terms of building recovery. Results indicated that 93.2% of seriously or severely damaged buildings had been reoccupied. In addition to quantitative analysis, recovery-related problems are discussed based on interviews. Results will be useful in the next stage of our research using remote sensing data for the chronological understanding of the post-earthquake urban recovery process in Pisco.

Cite this article as:
Osamu Murao, Tomoyo Hoshi, Miguel Estrada,
Kazuya Sugiyasu, Masashi Matsuoka, and Fumio Yamazaki, “Urban Recovery Process in Pisco After the 2007 Peru Earthquake,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.8, No.2, pp. 356-364, 2013.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] Instituto Nacional de Defensa Civil (INDECI), Censo INEI en las Zonas Afectadas por el Sismo del 15 Ago 07,
    http://www.inei.gob.pe [July 3, 2012]
  2. [2] Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI), “Learning from Earthquakes The Pisco, Peru, Earthquake of August 15, 2007,” EERI Special Earthquake Report – October 2007, pp.1-12,
    https://www.eeri.org/lfe/pdf/peru_pisco_eeri_preliminary_reconnaissance.pdf [accessed July 6, 2012]
  3. [3] 2007 Pisco, Peru Earthquake Reconnaissance Team by Japan Society of Civil Engineers (JSCE), Japan Association for Earthquake Engineering (JAEE) and University of Tokyo with the Collaboration of CISMID, National University Engineering, “A Reconnaissance Report on the Pisco, Peru Earthquake of August 15, 2007,” pp. 1-109,
    http://shake.iis.u-tokyo.ac.jp/Peru2007/JSCE_JAEE_Report/ [accessed July 11, 2012]
  4. [4] International Recovery Platform, “Recovery after the 2007 Pisco, Peru Earthquake,” ABAG Earthquake and Hazard Program, Local and Regional Disaster Recovery Planning Issues Paper, pp. 1-2, 2008.
  5. [5] J. C. Ventura, “Avances en el Proceso de Reconstrucción de Ica., Abril 2010,” Fond de Reconstruccion del Sur (FORSUR), 2010.
  6. [6] S. Matsuzaki, F. Yamazaki, M. Estrada, and C. Zavala, “Building Damage Distribution by QuickBird Satellite Image for 2007 Pisco Earthquake, Peru,” Journal of Social Safety Science, No.13, pp. 407-413, 2010.
  7. [7] Ministro de Vivienda, Construcción y Saneamiento, Peru, “Presentación del Ministro de Vivienda, Construcción y Saneamiento,” 2011,
    http://www.vivienda.gob.pe/popup/Documentos_presentaciones/10_05092011_presentación_comision_de_vivienda.pdf [accessed Oct. 31, 2012]
  8. [8] A. Jaime and M. Tsukazan, “Vulnerabilidad Físico Habitacional: Tarea de Todos ¿Responsabilidad deAlguien?,” Estudios Urbanos, 2009.
  9. [9] Perú, Instituto Nacional de Defensa Civil (INDECI), “Lecciones Aprendidas del sur Sismo de Pisco, 15 Agosto 2007,” 2009.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Mar. 05, 2021