single-dr.php

JDR Vol.6 No.5 pp. 506-513
doi: 10.20965/jdr.2011.p0506
(2011)

Development Report:

Approach to Environmental, Health and Safety Issues of Nanotechnology in Japan

Masahiro Takemura*, Go Yoshizawa**,
and Tatsujiro Suzuki***

*Information Analysis Office, National Institute for Materials Science, 1-2-1 Sengen, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0047, Japan

**Policy Alternatives Research Institute, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan

***Japan Atomic Energy Commission, 3-1-1 Kasumigaseki, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-8970, Japan

Received:
May 26, 2011
Accepted:
July 25, 2011
Published:
October 1, 2011
Keywords:
nanotechnology, nanomaterials, risk assessment and management, hazards, in-vivo test
Abstract

In environmental, health, and safety issues of nanotechnology (nanoEHS), at present, risk assessment and management of nanomaterials to protect workers, consumers, and the environment is the most urgent. Workers have the highest possibility of being exposed to nanomaterials in workplaces, where nanomaterials may be inhaled or enter the body through dermal exposure. Several kinds of in-vivo tests have been done to assess the hazards of nanomaterials, mainly in terms of immunity response and carcinogenicity. Most advanced countries agree that it is important to manage the risks of nanomaterials with using the existing framework for chemical substances as much as possible to minimize risks, product of hazard and exposure. Research papers on the hazards of nanomaterials have been increasing, but there have been comparatively little scientific data related to exposuremeasurement. The Japanese government and national research institutes have been proactively committed to this issue since 2004. In addition to supporting several domestic projects, the Japanese government proactively joined international bodies such as the OECD Working Party on Manufactured Nanomaterials and ISO TC-229. Still, much more scientific data in appropriate studies and more discussion by appropriate participants are needed although funding is limited. To improve the situation, proposals have included (1) promoting basic research on nanoEHS, (2) increasing opportunities for scientific discussion on nanoEHS, (3) working continuously to construct and maintain databases on nanoEHS, (4) promoting the involvement of multistakeholders in nanoEHS, and (5) having ministries working cooperatively and efficiently on nanoEHS.

Cite this article as:
M. Takemura, G. Yoshizawa, and <. Suzuki, “Approach to Environmental, Health and Safety Issues of Nanotechnology in Japan,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.6, No.5, pp. 506-513, 2011.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] Verein Deutscher Ingenieure, “Industrial application of nanomaterials-chances and risks, Technology analysis,” 2004.
  2. [2] Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, “Survey on safety measures against risks of nanomaterials,” 2008 (in Japanese).
  3. [3] Royal Society & Royal Academy of Engineering, “Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: opportunities and uncertainties,” 2004.
  4. [4] National Institute forMaterials Science, National Institute of Health Sciences, the National Institute for Environmental Studies, Nagoya University, “Communication on Topics of Nano Materials Impacts on Organisms and Environment,” 2007 (in Japanese).
  5. [5] National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, National Institute for Materials Science, National Institute for Environmental Studies, National Institute of Health Sciences, “Research Project on Facilitation of Public Acceptance of Nanotechnology, “Summary and Policy Recommendations,” 2006 (in Japanese).
  6. [6] R. F. Service, “Nanotubes: the next asbestos?,” Science 281, p.941, 1998.
  7. [7] E. Oberdoerster, “Manufactured nanomaterials (Fullerenes, C60) induce oxidative stress in the brain of juvenile largemouth bass,” Environmental Health Perspective, Vol.112, No.10, pp. 1058-1062, 2004.
  8. [8] Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, Japan Patent Office, “Trend of patent application technologies in FY2006, part 2: nanotechnology,” pp. 14-15, 2007 (in Japanese).
  9. [9] Royal Society, Science Council of Japan, “Report of UK Royal Society-Science Council of Japan joint workshop on potential health, environmental and societal impacts of nanotechnologies,” 2006.
  10. [10] Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, “Report on appropriate safety measures for nanomaterial manufacturer,” 2009 (in Japanese).
  11. [11] Meridian Institute, “Proceedings of International Dialogue on Responsible Research and Development of Nanotechnology,” 2004.
  12. [12] National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, National Institute for Materials Science, “Report of 2nd International Dialogue on Responsible Research and Development of Nanotechnology,” 2006.
  13. [13] OECD Working Party on Manufactured Nanomaterials website,
    http://www.oecd.org/about/0,3347,en_2649_37015404_1_1_1_1_37465,00.html [accessed: Feb. 2011]
  14. [14] ISO TC-229 website,
    http://www.oecd.org/about/0,3347,en_264937015404_1_1_1_1_37465,00.html [accessed: Feb. 2011]
  15. [15] International Council on Nanotechnology website,
    http://www.icon.rice.edu/about.cfm?doc_id=4379 [accessed: Feb. 2011]
  16. [16] International Alliance for NanoEHS Harmonization website,
    http://www.nanoehsalliance.org/ [accessed: Feb. 2011]
  17. [17] A. Takagi, A. Hirose, T. Nishimura, et al., “Induction of mesothelioma in p53+/- mouse by intraperitoneal application of multiwall carbon nanotube,” Journal of Toxicological Science, Vol.33, No.1, pp. 105-116, 2008.
  18. [18] C. A. Poland, R. Duffin, I. Kinloch, et al., “Carbon nanotubes introduced into the abdominal cavity of mice show asbestos-like pathogenicity in a plot study,” Nature Nanotechnology, Vol.3, pp. 423-428, 2008.
  19. [19] National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology website,
    http://www.aist-riss.jp/projects/nedo-nanorisk/index_e.html [accessed: Feb. 2011]

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, IE9,10,11, Opera.

Last updated on Sep. 26, 2018