single-dr.php

JDR Vol.5 No.5 pp. 577-590
(2010)
doi: 10.20965/jdr.2010.p0577

Paper:

Chile’s 2010 M8.8 Earthquake and Tsunami: Initial Observations on Resilience

Guillermo Franco* and William Siembieda**

*AIR Worldwide, 131 Dartmouth St, Boston, MA 02116, USA

**City & Regional Planning Department, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407-0283, USA

Received:
August 18, 2010
Accepted:
September 17, 2010
Published:
October 1, 2010
Keywords:
Chile, earthquakes, resilience, natural disasters, social impacts
Abstract

On February 27, 2010, an earthquake of momentmagnitude 8.8 struck the central Pacific coast of Chile, triggering a tsunami and causing severe shaking along nearly 600 km of coastline from Viña del Mar in the north to Concepción and beyond in the south. This disaster tested the country’s government disaster management capacity as well as its built environment. Despite the large amount of energy released in this event and the large area affected, the actual impacts were limited in terms of severity and in terms of geographic dispersion and loss of life. A set of observations on the impact, mitigation, and response that were obtained during a disaster reconnaissance survey organized by the Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI) and extended from March 12-22 are presented. Using the concept of disaster resiliency these observations attempt to tie to past and current efforts within the government and within the local communities to explore the question: how resilient was Chile in the face of this disaster? Suggestions for further research on coastal land use planning, permanent housing replacement schemes, and the roots of civil disorder are made.

Cite this article as:
G. Franco and W. Siembieda, “Chile’s 2010 M8.8 Earthquake and Tsunami: Initial Observations on Resilience,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.5, No.5, pp. 577-590, 2010.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] W. J. Siembieda, “Lowering Vulnerability Using the Asset-Access-Time Method.” J. of Disaster Research, Vol. 5, No.2. April 2010.
  2. [2] M. Bruneau, S. E. Chang, R. T. Eguchi, G. C. Lee, T. D. O’Rourke, A. M. Reinhorn, M. Shinozuka, K. Tierney, W. A. Wallace, and D. von Winterfeldt, “A Framework to Quantitatively Assess and Enhance the Seismic Resilience of Communities,” Earthquake Spectra, Vol.19, No.4, pp. 733-752, November 2003.
  3. [3] A. K. Jha, J. D. Barenstein, D. Pittet, and S. Sena, “Safer Homes, Stronger Communities: A Handbook for Reconstructing after Natural Disasters,” The World Bank, Washington, D.C., 2009.
  4. [4] W. G. Peacock, H. Kunreuther, W. H. Hooke, S. L. Cutter, S. E. Chang, and P. R. Berke, “Toward a Resilience and Vulnerability Observatory Network: RAVON,” HRRC Reports: 08-02R, 2008.
    www.archone.tamu.edu/hrrc/publications/researchreports/RAVON.
  5. [5] EERI Newsletter, Vol.44, No.6, June 2010.
  6. [6] B. E. Aguirre, “Chile’s Civil Defense and Lack of Mitigation,” 2010. In David A. McEntire, (Ed.) Comparative Emergency Management: Understanding Disaster Policies, Organizations, and Initiatives from Around the World. Federal Emergency Management Agency: Emmetsburg, MD, 2010.
  7. [7] P. Gülkan, M. Aschheim, and R. Spence, “Reinforced Concrete Frame Building with Masonry Infill,” World Housing Encyclopedia, EERI, Report #64, 2002.
  8. [8] M. Erdik and E. Durukal, “Earthquake Risk and its Mitigation in Istanbul,” Natural Hazards 44 (2), pp. 181-197, 2008.
  9. [9] M. Comerio, “Disaster Hits Home: New Policy for Urban Housing Recovery,” Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1998.
  10. [10] L. Dengler, “Tsunami Team Report,” EERI Clearinghouse. April 2010.
  11. [11] K. Tierney, “Societal Dimensions of Earthquakes and Other Disasters: Findings in Search of Theory.” Proc. of the 9th US National and 10th Canadian Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, July 25-29, 2010, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Paper #1898, 2010.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, IE9,10,11, Opera.

Last updated on Jan. 18, 2019