JDR Vol.5 No.4 pp. 463-468
doi: 10.20965/jdr.2010.p0463


Study on the Containment Performance of MOX Fuel Processing Glovebox in Earthquake -Loading and Leakage Tests for Window Panels-

Akihiro Matsuda*1, Yuichi Uchiyama*2, Masakatsu Inagaki*2,
Susumu Tsuchino*3, Hiroyuki Umetsu*4, and Koji Shirai*5

*1Graduate School of Systems and Information Engineering, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8573, Japan

*2Seismic Safety Division, Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization, Tokyo, Japan

*3Nuclear Energy System Safety Division, Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization, Tokyo, Japan

*4Fuji Electric Systems Co., Ltd, Power Plant Business Headquarters, Kanagawa, Japan

*5Civil Engineering Research Laboratory, Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry, Chiba, Japan

March 16, 2010
April 13, 2010
August 1, 2010
glovebox, MOX fuel, finite element analysis, leakage test

This paper shows the results of the leakage tests and the large deformation analysis of a full-scale glovebox window to establish the capacity of the containment of the MOX fuel manufacturing glovebox during an earthquake. In leakage tests, the stainless steel container installed on the reverse of the glovebox window was pressurized with a halogen-air mixture after deformation was applied to the upper part of window frame using 6 micro handy jacks, and to the four glove-ports using electrical actuators. A numerical model for the rubber seal was obtained with biaxial loading tests of chloroprene sheet specimens. Tensile loading tests of acrylic resin specimens were conducted to measure the material modulus. The FEM code ABAQUS was applied to the numerical simulation and the user-subroutine function for the hyperelastic model was used to predict the deformation of the rubber seal. These tests demonstrated that a glovebox window constructed with a rubber seal and a resin panel shows no leakage larger than 0.1 vol%/h with large static deformation. The results of the numerical simulation showed that the rubber seal resolved the effects of deformation of a window panel on the containment barrier, and that two lips of the rubber seal play a key role on the containment of the glovebox.

Cite this article as:
Akihiro Matsuda, Yuichi Uchiyama, Masakatsu Inagaki,
Susumu Tsuchino, Hiroyuki Umetsu, and Koji Shirai, “Study on the Containment Performance of MOX Fuel Processing Glovebox in Earthquake -Loading and Leakage Tests for Window Panels-,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.5, No.4, pp. 463-468, 2010.
Data files:
  1. [1] “Glove Box for Handling of Radioactive Substance,” Japan Standard Association, Japan Industrial Standard, No.JISZ4808, 2002.
  2. [2] “Test Method for Leakage of Glove Boxes,” Japan Standard Association, Japan Industrial Standard, No.JISZ4820, 2002.
  3. [3] “Standard Guide for Design Criteria for Plutonium Gloveboxes,” American Society for Testing and Materials, No.ASTM C852-93, 1997.
  4. [4] D. Tobias, “Glovebox window and frames,” 18th Annual Conf. of the American Glovebox Society, No.AGS-G001-1998, 1998.
  5. [5] “Guideline for Gloveboxes,” No.AGS-G001-1998, American Glovebox Society, 1998.
  6. [6] S. Miura, S. Ousaka, Y. Kawada, and, Ito, “Earthquake resistant test of new type glove box,” Transaction of SMiRT17, No.K08-6, Prague, Czech Republic, 2003.
  7. [7] S. Miura, J. Kanazawa, M. Nakajima, K. Sakuno, and H. Miyata, “Confirmation test on confinement performance of improved glove box,” Transaction of SMiRT13, Vol.3, pp. 405-410, Alegre, Brazil, 1995.
  8. [8] S. T. Hargett and W. N. Kennedy, “Evaluation of seismic capacity of glovebox windows using deformation tests,” Fifth Department of Energy Natural Phenomena Hazard Mitigations Symposium, Denver, Colorado, 1995.
  9. [9] T. Fujita, K. Ohtani, M. Hayashi, M. Kozeki, T. Ide, and K. Sakuno, “Earthquake resistance test of full-scale glove box,” Transaction of SMiRT10, pp. 877-882, Anaheim, CA, USA, 1989.
  10. [10] W. Seki, Y. Fukahori, Y. Iseda, and T. Matsunaga, “A largedeformation finite-element analysis for multilayer elastomeric bearings,” Transaction of a Meeting of the Rubber Division, American chemical Society, pp. 856-870, 1987.
  11. [11] “ABAQUS Theory manual,” Version 6.6, Simulia corp., 2007.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Mar. 05, 2021