Top > JDR > Participatory Risk Communication Method for Risk Governance Us ...

single-dr.php

JDR Vol.3 No.6 pp. 442-456
(2008)
doi: 10.20965/jdr.2008.p0442

Paper:

Views over last 60 days: 407

Participatory Risk Communication Method for Risk Governance Using Disaster Risk Scenarios

Toshinari Nagasaka, Hiroaki Tsubokawa, Yuichiro Usuda,
Shingo Nagamatsu, Shinya Miura, and Saburo Ikeda

Disaster Prevention System Research Center, National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention, 3-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0006, Japan

Received:
November 17, 2008
Accepted:
January 16, 2009
Published:
December 1, 2008
Creative Commons License
Keywords:
disaster risk, risk scenario, disaster governance, risk communication
Abstract
The capability of resident-led responses to disasters has declined in recent years due to rapid changes in social and urban structures in Japan. In order to improve regional disaster prevention capabilities with regard to disaster risk, which includes a multitude of uncertainties induced by societal changes, it is necessary to reorganize conventional ways of disaster risk management from top-down to bottom-up principle of complementarity with residents as the base point. A multilayered disaster prevention system, corresponded to the diversity of local self-governing activities by residents in ordinary times, would improve regional capabilities for disaster prevention and also increase the likelihood that these capabilities could be expressed in the response at the time of a disaster. This is what we postulate in this paper as a new mode of 'disaster risk governance'. The effectiveness of this postulation will be verified based on a case study of the disaster response by residents in the Kitajo district of Kashiwazaki City, Niigata Prefecture at the time of the Chuetsu-Oki Earthquake, which occurred on July 16, 2007. On that basis, we have developed a new disaster risk communication method in which residents and other stakeholders can ; i) develop an awareness of the current situation of the disaster risk governance structure and related problems, ii) organize a variety of district self-government networks in ordinary times, iii) build a multilayered disaster prevention system that makes use of those networks and other local resources for disaster prevention, and iv) link these efforts to specific disaster prevention activities. To confirm its effectiveness, we have applied this method to the residents-led workshops with voluntary disaster prevention organizations in Fujisawa City, Kanagawa Prefecture.
Cite this article as:
T. Nagasaka, H. Tsubokawa, Y. Usuda, S. Nagamatsu, S. Miura, and S. Ikeda, “Participatory Risk Communication Method for Risk Governance Using Disaster Risk Scenarios,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.3 No.6, pp. 442-456, 2008.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] U. Beck, “Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity,” Saga Publications, 1992.
  2. [2] A. Giddens, “Runaway World: How Globalization is Reshaping Our lives,” Profile Books, 1999.
  3. [3] T. McDaniels and M. Small (Eds.), “Risk Analysis and Society: An Interdisciplinary Characterization of the Field,” Cambridge University Press, 2004.
  4. [4] IRGC, “White Paper on Risk Governance,” International Risk Governance Council, 2005.
  5. [5] O. Renn, “Risk Governnance; Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex world,” Earthscan, 2008.
  6. [6] S. Goldsmith and W. D. Eggers, “Governing by Network: The New Shape of the Public Sector,” Brookings Institution Press, 2004.
  7. [7] C. Lyall and J. Tait (Eds.), “New Modes of Governance,” Ashgate Publishing, 2005.
  8. [8] K. Nitagai, et al., “Ekkyousuru toshi to gavanansu,” Hosei university Press, pp. 87-111, 2006 (in Japanese).
  9. [9] K. Miyakawa, et al., “Public Governance – Kaikakuto Senryaku,” Nihonkeizai hyoronsha, 2002 (in Japanese).
  10. [10] S. Ikeda, “Risk Society and Planning Approach: toward societal governance on technological and environmental risks,” J. of Planning Administration, Vol.27, No.3, pp. 3-11, 2004 (in Japanese).
  11. [11] S. Ikeda, T. Sato, and T. Fukuzono, “Towards an integrated management framework for emerging disaster risks in Japan,” Natural Hazards, 2008.
  12. [12] J. Oyane, “Community bosai no aratana tenkaini kansuru ichikosatsu,” Information and Society, Vol.9, pp. 237-249, 1999 (in Japanese).
  13. [13] Hyogo prefectural government, “History of the Recover from the 1995 Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake,” 1997 (in Japanese).
  14. [14] W. Kurata, “Bosai Fukushi Community,” Minerva Publishing, 1999 (in Japanese).
  15. [15] S. Nagamatsu, “Gensai seisakuron nyumon,” Kobundo Publishing, 2008 (in Japanese).
  16. [16] T. Nagasaka and S. Ikeda, “Strategy and Methodology for Disaster Risk Governance,” Japanese Journal of Risk Analysis, Vol.17, No.3, pp. 13-23, 2008 (in Japanese).
  17. [17] Y. Usuda, T. Nagasaka, S. Okada, A. Amano, and H. Fujiwara, “Disaster Risk Information Platform for Risk Governance,” Proceedings of the SRA-Japan Annual Conference, Vol.21, Nov. 29-30, 2008 (in Japanese).
  18. [18] S. Miura, H. Tsubokawa, T. Nagasaka, S. Nagamatsu, and S. Ikeda, “Disaster risk governance in Kashiwazaki City, in case of Chuetsu-Oki Earthquake, 2007: From the viewpoint of community policy and local potency,” Proceedings of the SRA-Japan Annual Conference, Vol.21, Nov. 29-30, 2008 (in Japanese).
  19. [19] R. C. Schank, “Tell me a story new look at real and artificial memory,” John Brockman Associates, Inc., New York, 1990.
  20. [20] H. Tsubokawa, T. Nagasaka, and Y. Usuda, “An Experiment on Evacuation Shelter Management Using Disaster Risk Scenario – A Study of Risk Communication intended to reorganize the Structure for Disaster Risk Governance –,” Journal of the Institute of Social Safety Science, No.10. 2008 (in Japanese).
  21. [21] V. A. Pestoff, “Beyond the Market and State-Social Enterprise & Civil Democracy in a Welfare Society,” Ashgate Publishing, 1998.

Creative Commons License  This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationa License.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Apr. 19, 2024