With the development of online education technology, the status of English online education system is also increasing. However, the current intelligent learning guide design lacks self-adaptation and cannot get the learning state of different students. In addition, it is not possible to provide personalized learning and topic push for students with different learning states. Therefore, we propose an intelligent guide design for English online education based on deep learning, which combines knowledge tracking algorithm and exercise recommendation algorithm. Our model can extract students’ knowledge state and ability level and recommend appropriate exercises. In addition, we also introduce knowledge graph technology and use knowledge graph embedding technology to preprocess the knowledge points of exercises to enhance the state representation in the model and explore the implicit relationship. Experiments are designed to prove the effectiveness and superiority of our proposed method. Experimental results of DACK model: ACC = 93.1%, AUC = 98.8%, significantly superior to traditional knowledge tracking methods. Experimental results of DRSS model: Hit-Ratio@10 = 41.6%, NDCG@10 = 70.2%, performed excellently in personalized practice recommendations.

1. [1] J. de la Torre and J. A. Douglas, “Higher-order latent trait models for cognitive diagnosis,” Psychometrika, Vol.69, No.3, pp. 333-353, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02295640
2. [2] A. A. Silva Cornejo, D. T. Vargas Requena, J. C. Huerta Mendoza, J. L. Martínez Rodríguez, and W. Rodriguez, “An intelligent tutoring system for identification of learning styles and assignment educational strategies,” Int. J. of Combinatorial Optimization Problems and Informatics, Vol.15, No.1, pp. 62-75, 2024. https://doi.org/10.61467/2007.1558.2024.v15i1.422
3. [3] M. S. Hernández, “Beliefs and attitudes of Canarians towards the Chilean linguistic variety,” Lenguas Modernas, No.62, pp. 183-209, 2023 (in Spanish).
4. [4] J. Li, C. Wang, and M. Li, “Knowledge tracking algorithm driven by graph ripple feature,” J. of Chinese Computer Systems, Vol.44, No.7, pp. 1419-1427, 2023 (in Chinese). https://doi.org/10.20009/j.cnki.21-1106/TP.2021-0877
5. [5] S. Wu, X. Luo, J. Xiong, M. Zhong, and M. Wang, “Review on research of knowledge tracking,” J. of Frontiers of Computer Science and Technology, Vol.17, No.7, pp. 1506-1525, 2023 (in Chinese).
6. [6] T. Liu, M. Zhang, C. Zhu, and L. Chang, “Transformer-based convolutional forgetting knowledge tracking,” Scientific Reports, Vol.13, Article No.19112, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45936-0
7. [7] L. Kang and Y. Wang, “Efficient and accurate personalized product recommendations through frequent item set mining fusion algorithm,” Heliyon, Vol.10, No.3, Article No.e25044, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25044
8. [8] Q. Liu, M. Yu, and M. Bai, “A study on a recommendation algorithm based on spectral clustering and GRU,” iScience, Vol.27, No.2, Article No.108660, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.108660
9. [9] S. Bin, “An e-commerce personalized recommendation algorithm based on multiple social relationships,” Sustainability, Vol.16, No.1, Article No.362, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16010362
10. [10] F. Xie, “Intelligent personalized recommendation method based on optimized collaborative filtering algorithm in primary and secondary education resource system,” IEEE Access, Vol.12, pp. 28860-28872, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3365549
11. [11] J. Gehring, M. Auli, D. Grangier, D. Yarats, and Y. N. Dauphin, “Convolutional sequence to sequence learning,” Proc. of the 34th Int. Conf. on Machine Learning, pp. 1243-1252, 2017.
12. [12] H. Yin et al., “Adapting to user interest drift for POI recommendation,” IEEE Trans. on Knowledge and Data Engineering, Vol.28, No.10, pp. 2566-2581, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2016.2580511
13. [13] R. Henson and J. Douglas, “Test construction for cognitive diagnosis,” Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol.29, No.4, pp. 262-277, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621604272623
14. [14] D. Silver et al., “Deterministic policy gradient algorithms,” Proc. of the 31st Int. Conf. on Machine Learning, pp. 387-395, 2014.
15. [15] T. Fu, P. Li, and S. Liu, “An imbalanced small sample slab defect recognition method based on image generation,” J. of Manufacturing Processes, Vol.118, pp. 376-388, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2024.03.028
16. [16] T. Fu, S. Liu, and P. Li, “Digital twin-driven smelting process management method for converter steelmaking,” J. of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-024-02366-7
17. [17] T. Fu, P. Li, and S. Liu, “A method for quality inspection of continuous casting billet based on infrared flaw detection and 2-D image,” IEEE Trans. on Instrumentation and Measurement, Vol.74, Article No.5002214, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2024.3502874
18. [18] T. Fu and P. Li, “Position-aware Transformer-based one-stage torpedo can connecting device camouflage object detection algorithm,” 2024 IEEE 20th Int. Conf. on Automation Science and Engineering, pp. 1337-1344, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1109/CASE59546.2024.10711348
19. [19] C. Piech et al., “Deep knowledge tracing,” Proc. of the 29th Int. Conf. on Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 505-513, 2015.
20. [20] C.-K. Yeung and D.-Y. Yeung, “Addressing two problems in deep knowledge tracing via prediction-consistent regularization,” Proc. of the 5th Annual ACM Conf. on Learning at Scale, Article No.5, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1145/3231644.3231647
21. [21] J. Zhang, X. Shi, I. King, and D.-Y. Yeung, “Dynamic key-value memory networks for knowledge tracing,” Proc. of the 26th Int. Conf. on World Wide Web, pp. 765-774, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1145/3038912.3052580
22. [22] S. Pandey and G. Karypis, “A self-attentive model for knowledge tracing,” arXiv:1907.06837, 2019. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1907.06837
23. [23] Y. Koren, “Factorization meets the neighborhood: A multifaceted collaborative filtering model,” Proc. of the 14th ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 426-434, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1145/1401890.1401944
24. [24] S. Rendle, “Factorization machines with libFM,” ACM Trans. on Intelligent Systems and Technology, Vol.3, No.3, Article No.57, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1145/2168752.2168771
25. [25] B. Hidasi, A. Karatzoglou, L. Baltrunas, and D. Tikk, “Session-based recommendations with recurrent neural networks,” arXiv:1511.06939, 2015. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1511.06939
26. [26] X. Yu et al., “Personalized entity recommendation: A heterogeneous information network approach,” Proc. of the 7th ACM Int. Conf. on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 283-292, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556195.2556259
27. [27] H. Wang, M. Zhao, X. Xie, W. Li, and M. Guo, “Knowledge graph convolutional networks for recommender systems,” The World Wide Web Conf. (WWW’19), pp. 3307-3313, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308558.3313417
28. [28] Z. Huang et al., “Exploring multi-objective exercise recommendations in online education systems,” Proc. of the 28th ACM Int. Conf. on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 1261-1270, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357384.3357995