JACIII Vol.26 No.4 pp. 549-554
doi: 10.20965/jaciii.2022.p0549


The Motivation Behind Participation in Virtual CSR Co-Creation by Chinese Post-90s: A Case Study of Ant Forest

Huihui Cheng* and Yukio Kodono**,†

*Graduate School of Commerce, Kindai University
3-4-1 Kowakae, Higashiosaka City, Osaka 577-8502, Japan

**Faculty of Business Administration, Kindai University
3-4-1 Kowakae, Higashiosaka City, Osaka 577-8502, Japan

Corresponding author

February 14, 2022
March 31, 2022
July 20, 2022
virtual CSR co-creation, Ant Forest, motivation, brand attitude
The Motivation Behind Participation in Virtual CSR Co-Creation by Chinese Post-90s: A Case Study of Ant Forest

Actual screen of Ant Forest

With the development of economy and society, the utilization of the Internet in all walks of life is booming, and corporate social responsibility (CSR) has also evolved from a traditional offline model to a combination of online and offline models. The use of social media for value co-creation is called virtual value co-creation. China’s Alipay platform launched a public welfare activity Ant Forest, which is an example of virtual value co-creation. Behind this seemingly simple activity is a complex value co-creation behavior. This article considers Ant Forest as an example, guided by the theory of value co-creation, and selects the post-90s as the research object to explore the motivation of users to participate in virtual value co-creation.

Cite this article as:
H. Cheng and Y. Kodono, “The Motivation Behind Participation in Virtual CSR Co-Creation by Chinese Post-90s: A Case Study of Ant Forest,” J. Adv. Comput. Intell. Intell. Inform., Vol.26, No.4, pp. 549-554, 2022.
Data files:
  1. [1] R. F. Lusch, S. L. Vargo, and A. J. Malter, “Marketing as Service-Exchange: Taking a Leadership Role in Global Marketing Management,” Organizational Dynamics, Vol.35, No.3, pp. 264-278, 2006.
  2. [2] China Internet Network Information Center (CNNIC) (in Chinese). [accessed Feb. 12, 2022]
  3. [3] S. Ye, X. Shen, and L. Yang, “Motivation to participate in Ant Forest,” Master’s thesis, Uppsala University, 2019.
  4. [4] M. Etgar, “A descriptive model of the consumer co-production process,” J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci., Vol.36, pp. 97-108, 2008.
  5. [5] J. Füller, “Refining virtual co-creation from a consumer perspective,” Management Review, Vol.52, No.2, pp. 97-122, 2010.
  6. [6] Y. Yi and T. Gong, “Customer value co-creation behavior: Scale development and validation,” J. of Business Research, Vol.66, No.9, pp. 1279-1284, 2013.
  7. [7] W. Jarvis, R. Ouschan, H. J. Burton et al., “Customer engagement in CSR: A utility theory model with moderating variables,” J. of Service Theory and Practice, Vol.27, No.4, pp. 833-853, 2017.
  8. [8] H. Xiao, “Research on the Influence of Red Family Communication Mode on Teenagers’ Brand Attitude,” Nankai Management Review, Vol.12, No.4, pp. 36-43, 2009 (in Chinese).
  9. [9] J. Chai, “The influence of brand trust on the relationship between brand attitude, fit perception and extended evaluation,” J. of Management, Vol.4, No.4, pp. 425-430, 2009 (in Chinese).
  10. [10] F. Liu, and L. Wang, “A Study on the Influence of Brand Image on Customers’ Brand Attitude,” Enterprise Management, Vol.1, pp. 67-74, 2009 (in Chinese).
  11. [11] W. Zhou and J. Yang, “An Empirical Study on the Influence of Public Welfare Marketing on Consumer Brand Attitudes,” Proc. of the 3rd Annual Conf. of China Management Society, pp. 3196-3209, 2008 (in Chinese).
  12. [12] J. Yao, “The influence of humorous appeal advertisements on brand attitudes: A discussion based on drugs,” Nanjing Social Sciences, Vol.11, pp. 54-58, 2009 (in Chinese).
  13. [13] B. Mittal, “The relative roles of brand beliefs and attitude toward the ad as mediators of brand attitude: A second look,” J. of marketing research, Vol.27, No.2, pp. 209-219, 1990.
  14. [14] S. Wu, “A Comparative Study on Mobilization and Participation Mechanisms of Internet Public Welfare Projects: Based on the Analysis of Three Internet Public Welfare Projects,” Minzu University of China, 2013 (in Chinese).
  15. [15] C. B. Bhattacharya and S. Sen, “Doing Better at Doing Good: When, Why, and How Consumers Respond to Corporate Social Initiatives,” California Management Review, Vol.47, No.1, pp. 9-24, 2004.
  16. [16] Q. Li, J. Xu, and D. Bi, “Influencing factors of users’ willingness to participate in value co-creation in shared service platforms,” Enterprise Economy, 2019 (in Chinese).
  17. [17] J. C. Mowen and M. S. Minor, “A Concise Course of Consumer Behavior,” Tsinghua University Press, 2001 (in Chinese).
  18. [18] D. J. Bem, “Self-perception Theory,” L. Berkowitz (Ed.), “Advances in Experimental Social Psychology,” Academic Press, pp. 1-62, 1972.
  19. [19] L. A. Festinger, “A Theory of cognitive dissonance,” Stanford university Press, 1957.
  20. [20] M. Morsing and M. Schultz, “Corporate social responsibility communication: Stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies,” Business Ethics: A European Review, Vol.15, No.4, pp. 323-338, 2006.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Aug. 05, 2022