JACIII Vol.25 No.5 pp. 563-573
doi: 10.20965/jaciii.2021.p0563


Agglomeration and Innovation: An Empirical Study Based on China’s Manufacturing Data

Zeyang Li

School of Statistics, Huaqiao University
No.668 Jimei Avenue, Jimei District, Xiamen, Fujian 361021, China

Corresponding author

August 3, 2020
April 8, 2021
September 20, 2021
innovation, spatial agglomeration, manufacturing data

This study explores the relationship between spatial agglomeration and innovation, taking Chinese manufacturing data as an example. Tractable model is built to explain the mechanism through which spatial concentration of firms in a city affects industrial innovation. Then in the empirical analysis, new agglomeration and innovation indicators are used to test the theoretical conclusions at the city-industry level. Results show that the geographical concentration of firms has significant negative effects on industrial innovation and growth. These overall effects can be divided into positive and negative categories after considering the interaction between the industrial labor scale and firm’s spatial agglomeration. Industries with a higher labor scale will bear more crowding effects of firms’ spatial agglomeration. These findings mean that moving to a less concentrated area might be a good choice for the labor-intensive firms which aim at innovation.

Cite this article as:
Z. Li, “Agglomeration and Innovation: An Empirical Study Based on China’s Manufacturing Data,” J. Adv. Comput. Intell. Intell. Inform., Vol.25 No.5, pp. 563-573, 2021.
Data files:
  1. [1] P.-P. Combes, T. Mayer, and J.-F. Thisse, “Economic Geography: The Integration of Regions and Nations,” Princeton University Press, 2008.
  2. [2] Y. Shao and Z. Li, “Spatial Agglomeration, Firm Dynamics and Economic Growth: An Analysis Based on China’s Manufacturing Industries,” China Industrial Economics, No.2, pp. 5-23, 2017 (in Chinese).
  3. [3] G. Duranton and H. G. Overman, “Testing for Localization Using Micro-Geographic Data,” Review of Economic Studies, Vol.72, No.4, pp. 1077-1106, 2005.
  4. [4] Z. Kou and X. Liu, “FIND Report on City and Industrial Innovation in China (2017),” Fudan University, 2017 (in Chinese).
  5. [5] M. Fujita, P. Krugman, and A. J. Venables, “The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade,” MIT Press, 2001.
  6. [6] M. Fujita and J.-F. Thisse, “Economics of Agglomeration: Cities, Industrial Location, and Globalization,” Cambridge University Press, 2013.
  7. [7] P. Aghion and P. W. Howitt, “The Economics of Growth,” MIT Press, 2008.
  8. [8] R. W. Helsley and W. C. Strange, “Matching and Agglomeration Economies in a System of Cities,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol.20, No.2, pp. 189-212, 1990.
  9. [9] M. P. Feldman and D. B. Audretsch, “Innovation in Cities: Science-Based, Diversity, Specialization and Localized Competition,” European Economic Review, Vol.43, No.2, pp. 409-429, 1999.
  10. [10] R. E. Baldwin and R. Forslid, “The Core-Periphery Model and Endogenous Growth: Stabilizing and Destabilizing Integration,” Economica, Vol.67, No.267, pp. 307-324, 2000.
  11. [11] G. Duranton and D. Puga, “Nursery Cities: Urban Diversity, Process Innovation and the Life Cycle of Products,” American Economic Review, Vol.91, No.5, pp. 1454-1477, 2001.
  12. [12] K. Frenken, F. Van Oort, and T. Verburg, “Related Variety, Unrelated Variety and Regional Economic Growth,” Regional Studies, Vol.41, No.5, pp. 685-697, 2007.
  13. [13] M. Brülhart and N. A. Mathys, “Sectoral Agglomeration Economies in a Panel of European Regions,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol.38, No.4, pp. 348-362, 2008.
  14. [14] E. Ghani, W. Kerr, and I. Tewari, “Specialization, Diversity, and Indian Manufacturing Growth,” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No.6648, 2013.
  15. [15] G. Duranton and D. Puga, “The Economics of Urban Density,” J. of Economic Perspectives, Vol.34, No.3, pp. 3-26, 2020.
  16. [16] W. R. Kerr and S. D. Kominers, “Agglomerative Forces and Cluster Shapes,” Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol.97, No.4, pp. 877-899, 2015.
  17. [17] G. Faggio, O. Silva, and W. C. Strange, “Heterogeneous Agglomeration,” Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol.99. No.1, pp. 80-94, 2017.
  18. [18] C. Gaubert, “Firm Sorting and Agglomeration,” American Economic Review, Vol.108, No.11, pp. 3117-3153, 2018.
  19. [19] M. P. Feldman and D. F. Kogler, “Stylized Facts in the Geography of Innovation,” B. Hall and N. Rosenberg (Eds.), “Handbook of the Economics of Innovation,” Vol.1, pp. 381-410, Elsevier, 2010.
  20. [20] G. Carlino and W. Kerr,“ Agglomeration and Innovation,” G. Duranton, J. Henderson, and W. Strange (Eds.), “Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics,” Vol.5, pp. 349-404, Elsevier, 2015.
  21. [21] G. Duranton and D. Puga, “Micro-Foundations of Urban Agglomeration Economies,” J. Henderson and J. Thisse (Eds.), “Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics,” Vol.4, pp. 2063-2117, Elsevier, 2004.
  22. [22] F. Capone, L. Lazzeretti, and N. Innocenti, “Innovation and Diversity: the Role of Knowledge Networks in the Inventive Capacity of Cities,” Small Business Economics, Vol.56, No.2, pp. 773-788, 2021.
  23. [23] A. Niebuhr, J. C. Peters, and A. Schmidke, “Spatial Sorting of Innovative Firms and Heterogeneous Effects of Agglomeration on Innovation in Germany,” J. of Technology Transfer, Vol.45, No.5, pp. 1343-1375, 2020.
  24. [24] U. Akcigit, “Economic Growth: The Past, the Present, and the Future,” J. of Political Economy, Vol.125, No.6, pp. 1736-1747, 2017.
  25. [25] T. J. Klette and S. Kortum, “Innovating Firms and Aggregate Innovation,” J. of Political Economy, Vol.112, No.5, pp. 986-1018, 2004.
  26. [26] P. Aghion, U. Akcigit, and P. Howitt, “What Do We Learn from Schumpeterian Growth Theory?,” P. Aghion and S. Durlauf (Eds.), “Handbook of Economic Growth,” Vol.2, pp. 515-563, Elsevier, 2014.
  27. [27] U. Akcigit, D. Hanley, and N. Serrano-Velarde, “Back to Basics: Basic Research Spillovers, Innovation Policy, and Growth,” Review of Economic Studies, Vol.88, No.1, pp. 1-43, 2020.
  28. [28] J. Benhabib, J. Perla, and C. Tonetti, “Reconciling Models of Diffusion and Innovation: A Theory of the Productivity Distribution and Technology Frontier,” NBER Working Paper, No.23095, 2017.
  29. [29] U. Akcigit and W. R. Kerr, “Growth through Heterogeneous Innovation,” J. of Political Economy, Vol.126, No.4, pp. 1374-1443, 2018.
  30. [30] D. Acemoglu, U. Akcigit, H. Alp, N. Bloom, and W. Kerr, “Innovation, Reallocation and Growth,” American Economic Review, Vol.108, No.11, pp. 3450-3491, 2018.
  31. [31] P. Aghion, R. Blundell, R. Griffith, P. Howitt, and S. Prantl, “The Effects of Entry on Incumbent Innovation and Productivity,” Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol.91, No.1, pp. 20-32, 2009.
  32. [32] P. Aghion, N. Bloom, R. Blundell, R. Griffith, and P. Howitt, “Competition and Innovation: an Inverted-U Relationship,” Quarterly J. of Economics, Vol.120, No.2, pp. 701-728, 2005.
  33. [33] S. T. Howell, “Financing Innovation: Evidence from R&D Grants,” American Economic Review, Vol.107, No.4, pp. 1136-1164, 2017.
  34. [34] A. Mukherjee, M. Singh, and A. Žaldokas, “Do Corporate Taxes Hinder Innovation?,” J. of Financial Economics, Vol.124, No.1, pp. 195-221, 2017.
  35. [35] L. Brandt, J. Van Biesebroeck, and Y. Zhang, “Creative Accounting or Creative Destruction? Firm-level Productivity Growth in Chines Manufacturing,” J. of Development Economics, Vol.97, No.2, pp. 339-351, 2012.
  36. [36] A. Pakes and M. Schankerman, “The Rate of Obsolescence of Patents, Research Gestation Lags, and the Private Rate of Return to Research Resources,” Z. Griliches (Ed.), “R&D, Patents, and Productivity,” pp. 73-88, University of Chicago Press, 1984.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Jul. 19, 2024