JACIII Vol.20 No.7 pp. 1044-1050
doi: 10.20965/jaciii.2016.p1044


Delay Compensation for Teleoperation Systems Based on Communication Disturbance Observers

Wen-An Zhang, Junkai Jin, Xiang Qiu, and Li Yu

College of Information Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology
Hangzhou 310023, China

July 5, 2016
August 14, 2016
December 20, 2016
teleoperation, manipulator, time delay, active disturbance rejection control (ADRC), communication disturbance observer (CDOB)

This paper investigates the control problem for a class of teleoperation systems with communication delays. The network-induced delays are usually inevitable in teleoperation systems, and may be time varying and unpredictable. Since the conventional Smith predictor is only useful for fixed delays, a novel delay compensation and controller design method is proposed in this paper. The proposed method combines a disturbance rejection controller and a communication disturbance observer (CDOB). Simulations are provided to show the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed delay compensation and controller design method.

Cite this article as:
W. Zhang, J. Jin, X. Qiu, and L. Yu, “Delay Compensation for Teleoperation Systems Based on Communication Disturbance Observers,” J. Adv. Comput. Intell. Intell. Inform., Vol.20, No.7, pp. 1044-1050, 2016.
Data files:
  1. [1] C. Hua and X. P. Liu, “Delay-Dependent Stability Criteria of Teleoperation Systems with Asymmetric Time-Varying Delays,” IEEE Trans. on Robotics, Vol.26, No.5, pp. 925-932, 2010.
  2. [2] G. Niemeyer, “Telemanipulation with Time Delays,” The Int. J. of Robotics Research, Vol.23, No.9, pp. 873-890, 2004.
  3. [3] S. G. Liu, Z. X. Zhou, and F. Yang, “Teleoperation Control of an Internet-based Robot with Varying Time Delay,” Control Engineering of China, Vol.13. No.S0, pp. 179-181, 2006.
  4. [4] S. Ganjefar, H. Momeni, and F. Janabi-Sharifi, “Teleoperation Systems Design Using Augmented Wave-Variables and Smith Predictor Method for Reducing Time-Ddelay Effects,” Proc. of the IEEE Int. Symp. on Intelligent Control, Vancouver, Canada, IEEE. pp. 333-338, 2002.
  5. [5] S. Munir and W. J. Book, “Internet-based Teleoperation Using Wave Variables with Prediction,” IEEE/ASME Trans. on Mechatronics, Vol.7, No.2, pp. 124-133, 2002.
  6. [6] F. C. Liu, L. H. Liang, J. J. Gao, et al., “Trajectory Tracking Control with Active Disturbance Rejection for Space Manipulator in Different Gravity Environments,” Control Theory and Applications, Vol.31, No.3, pp. 352-360, 2014.
  7. [7] R. Oboe, “Web-interfaced, force-reflecting teleoperation systems,” IEEE Trans. on Industrial Electronics, Vol.48, No.6, pp. 1257-1265, 2002.
  8. [8] T. Slama, A. Trevisani, D. Aubry, et al., “Experimental Analysis of an Internet-Based Bilateral Teleoperation System With Motion and Force Scaling Using a Model Predictive Controller,” IEEE Trans. on Industrial Electronics, Vol.55, No.9, pp. 3290-3299, 2008.
  9. [9] K. Natori and K. Ohnishi, “A Design Method of Communication Disturbance Observer for Time-Delay Compensation, Taking the Dynamic Property of Network Disturbance Into Account,” IEEE Trans. on Industrial Electronics, Vol.55, No.5, pp. 2152-2168, 2008.
  10. [10] K. Natori and K. Ohnishi, “Disturbance-attenuation characteristic of a structure of time-delay system with communication disturbance observer,” IEEE Int. Conf. on Mechatronics (ICM), pp. 880-885, May, 2013.
  11. [11] J. Q. Han, “Active Disturbance Rejection Control Technique for Estimating and Compensating the Uncertainties,” Beijing, National Defense Industry Press, 2008.
  12. [12] T. B. Sheridan, “Space teleoperation through time delay: review and prognosis,” IEEE Trans. on Robotics and Automation, Vol.9, No.5, pp. 592-606, 1993.
  13. [13] A. Alfi and M. Farrokhi, “Force Reflecting Bilateral Control of Master–Slave Systems in Teleoperation,” J. of Intelligent and Robotic Systems, Vol.52, No.2, pp.209-232, 2008.
  14. [14] D. Yuan, X. J. Ma, Q. H. Zeng, et al., “Research on Frequency-Band Characteristics and Parameters Configuration of Linear Active Disturbance Rejection Control for Second-Order Systems,” Control Theory and Applications, Vol.30, No.12, pp. 1630-1640, 2013.
  15. [15] Q. Zheng and Z. Gao, “Predictive Active Disturbance Rejection Control for Processes with Delay,” Proc. of the 32nd China Control Conf. (CCC), Xi’an, IEEE, pp. 4108-4113, 2013.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, IE9,10,11, Opera.

Last updated on Nov. 16, 2018