single-jc.php

JACIII Vol.20 No.4 pp. 554-560
doi: 10.20965/jaciii.2016.p0554
(2016)

Paper:

Anisotropic Sampling Shape of White Matter Microstructure Cannot Cheat Diffusional Kurtosis

Yuanyuan Chen*,**, Xin Zhao**,†, Miao Sha**, Yanan Liu**, Jianguo Ma*, Hongyan Ni***, Hongzhi Qi**,†, and Dong Ming**

*School of Electronics and Information Engineering, Tianjin University
92, Weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin, China

**School of Precision instrument & Optoelectronic Engineering, Tianjin University
92, Weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin, China

***Department of Radiology, Tianjin First Central Hospital
24, Fukang Road, Nankai District, Tianjin, China

Corresponding author

Received:
October 30, 2015
Accepted:
April 13, 2016
Published:
July 19, 2016
Keywords:
diffusion tensor imaging, diffusion kurtosis imaging, white matter, anisotropic sampling
Abstract

Diffusion kurtosis imaging is a newly developed diffusion magnetic resonance imaging technique, which is becoming increasingly valuable in clinical practice. Although low-resolution sampling is commonly used to compensate the unsteadiness of kurtosis estimation, the influence of the sampling shape has not been investigated. In this study, by using two different acquisition protocols, isotropic and anisotropic sampling voxels were acquired and their influence on various white matter structures was observed. Fiber tracking, T-tests, and correlation analysis were used to quantify the difference between the anisotropic and isotropic sampling. A significant difference (p<0.01) was found in the fractional anisotropic level but not in kurtosis. The results presented here can provide a basis for higher resolution as well as higher quality kurtosis mapping, which may be of great significance in clinical examinations.

References
  1. [1] H. J. Jensen, A. H. Joseph, and R. Anita, “Diffusional Kurtosis Imaging: The Quantification of Non-Gaussian Water Diffusion by Means of Magnetic Resonance Imaging,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Vol.53, pp. 1432-1440, 2005.
  2. [2] J. B. Heidi and T. E. J. Behrens, “Diffusion MRI, From Quantitative Measurement to in vivo Neuroanatomy,” Academic Press, 2009.
  3. [3] S. Mori, “Introduction to Diffusion Tensor Imaging,” Elsevier Science Ltd, 2007.
  4. [4] J. Zhuo, S. Xu et al., “Diffusion kurtosis as an in vivo imaging marker for reactive astrogliosis in traumatic brain injury,” NeuroImage, Vol.59, pp. 467-477, 2012.
  5. [5] M. F. Falangola, J. H. Jensen et al., “Age-related nonGaussian diffusion patterns in the prefrontal brain,” Magn. Reson. Imaging, Vol.28, pp. 1345-1350, 2008.
  6. [6] J. Wang, W. Lin et al., “Parkinson disease: diagnostic utility of diffusion kurtosis imaging,” Radiology, Vol.261, pp. 210-217, 2011.
  7. [7] S. Cauter, J. Veraart et al., “Gliomas: diffusion kurtosis MR imaging in grading,” Radiology, Vol.263, pp. 492-501, 2012.
  8. [8] E. Fieremans, J. H. Jensen et al., “White matter characterization with diffusional kurtosis imaging,” NeuroImage, Vol.58, pp. 177-188, 2011.
  9. [9] I. Blockx, G. D. Groof et al., “Microstructural changes observed with DKI in a transgenic Huntington rat model: Evidence for abnormal neuro development,” NeuroImage, Vol.59, pp. 957-967, 2012.
  10. [10] G. R. Glenn, J. A. Helpern et al., “Quantitative assessment of diffusional kurtosis anisotropy,” NMR in Biomedicine, Vol.28, pp. 448-459, 2015.
  11. [11] A. Tabesh, J. H. Jensen et al., “Estimation of Tensors and Tensor-Derived Measures in Diffusional Kurtosis Imaging,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Vol.65, pp. 823-836, 2011.
  12. [12] A. Barmpoutis and B. C. Vemuri, “A Unified Framework For Estimating Diffusion Tensors of Any Orderwith Symmetric Positive-Definite Constraints,” Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging, pp, 1385-1388, 2010.
  13. [13] N. Gong, C. Wong et al., “Correlations between microstructural alterations and severity of cognitive deficiency in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment: a diffusional kurtosis imaging study,” Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Vol.31, pp. 688-694, 2013.
  14. [14] A. W. Yang, J. H. Jensen et al., “Effect of Cerebral Spinal Fluid Suppression for Diffusional Kurtosis Imaging,” J. of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Vol.37, pp. 365-371, 2013.
  15. [15] D. H. J. Poot, A. J. den Dekker, and E. Achten, “Optimal Experimental Design for Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging,” IEEE Trans. on Medical Imaging, Vol.29, pp. 819-829, 2010.
  16. [16] M. M. Cheung, E. S. Hui, K. C. Chan, J. A. Helpern, L. Qi, and E. X. Wu, “Does diffusion kurtosis imaging lead to better neural tissue characterization? A rodent brain maturation study,” Neuroimage, Vol.45, No.2, pp. 386-392, 2009.
  17. [17] E. Fieremans, A. Benitez, J. H. Jensen et al., “Novelwhite matter tract integrity metrics sensitive to Alzheimer disease progression. AJNR,” Am. J. Neuroradiol., Vol.34, pp. 2105-2112, 2013.
  18. [18] R. D. Y. Palacios, M. Verhoye et al., “Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging and High-Resolution MRI Demonstrate Structural Aberrations of Caudate Putamen and Amygdala after Chronic Mild Stress,” Plos One, Vol.9, pp. e95077, 2014.
  19. [19] R. N. Henriques, M. M. Correia, R. G. Nunes et al., “Exploring the 3D geometry of the diffusion kurtosis tensor—Impact on the development of robust tractography procedures and novel biomarkers,” NeuroImage, Vol.111, pp. 85-99, 2015.
  20. [20] I. O. Jelescu, J. Veraart, V. Adisetiyo et al., “One diffusion acquisition and different white matter models: How does microstructure change in human early development based on WMTI and NODDI?” NeuroImage, Vol.107, pp. 242-256, 2015.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, IE9,10,11, Opera.

Last updated on Dec. 12, 2017