JACIII Vol.20 No.3 pp. 412-417
doi: 10.20965/jaciii.2016.p0412


Impact Time Control Guidance Law Considering Seeker's Field-of-View Constraint Without Time-to-Go Information

Zhe Yang, Defu Lin, and Luyao Zang

School of Aerospace Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology
Zhong Guan Cun South Street, Haidian District, Beijing 10081, China

Corresponding author

September 13, 2015
January 5, 2016
May 19, 2016
impact time control, field-of-view, time-to-go, sliding mode control, salvo attack
Accurate time-to-go estimation with large heading angle error is difficult for homing guidance laws, especially for the impact time control. Considering this, a new cooperative guidance law which requires no time-to-go estimation is investigated. First, the impact time control problem is transformed to the look angle command tracking problem. The look angle command guarantees that the range-to-go error converges to zero asymptotically. Then the proposed guidance law considering the seeker's field-of-view constraint is derived using sliding mode control to track the desired look angle signal. Numerical simulations are performed to verify the effectiveness of the proposed guidance law for one-to-one and many-to-one engagement scenarios.
Cite this article as:
Z. Yang, D. Lin, and L. Zang, “Impact Time Control Guidance Law Considering Seeker's Field-of-View Constraint Without Time-to-Go Information,” J. Adv. Comput. Intell. Intell. Inform., Vol.20 No.3, pp. 412-417, 2016.
Data files:
  1. [1] J. I. Lee, I. S. Jeon, and M. J. Tahk, “Guidance law to control impact time and angle,” IEEE Trans. on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol.43, pp. 301-310, 2007.
  2. [2] H. Nathan and S. N. Balakrishnan, “Impact Time and Angle Guidance with Sliding Mode Control,” IEEE Trans. on Control Systems Technology, Vol.20, pp. 1436-1449, 2012.
  3. [3] Y. A. Zhang, G. X. Ma, and A. L. Liu, “Guidance law with impact time and impact angle constraints,” Chinese J. of Aeronautics, Vol.26, pp. 960-966, 2013.
  4. [4] J. Zeng, L. Dou, and B. Xin, “Cooperative salvo attack using guidance law of multiple missiles,” J. of Advanced Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Informatics (JACIII), Vol.19, pp. 301-306, 2015.
  5. [5] S. Kang and H. J. Kim, “Differential game missile guidance with impact angle and time constraints,” 18th IFAC World Congress, Milano, Italy, pp. 3920-3925, 2011.
  6. [6] I. S. Jeon, J. I. Lee, and M. J. Tahk, “Impact-time-control guidance law for anti-ship missiles,” IEEE Trans. on Control Systems Technology, Vol.14, pp. 260-266, 2006.
  7. [7] S. Zhao and R. Zhou, “Cooperative Guidance for Multimissile Salvo Attack,” Chinese J. of Aeronautics, Vol.21, pp. 533-539, 2008.
  8. [8] S. R. Kumar and D. Ghose, “Sliding mode control based guidance law with impact time constraints,” presented at the American Control Conf. (ACC), 2013.
  9. [9] D. Cho, H. J. Kim, and M.-J. Tahk, “Nonsingular Sliding Mode Guidance for Impact Time Control,” J. of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, pp. 1-8, 2015.
  10. [10] M. J. Tahk and D. K. Sang, “Guidance law switching logic considering the seeker's field-of-view limits,” Proc. of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: J. of Aerospace Engineering, Vol.223, pp. 1049-1058, 2009.
  11. [11] Y. A. Zhang, X. L. Wang, and H. L. Wu, “Impact time control guidance law with field of view constraint,” Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol.39, pp. 361-369, 2014.
  12. [12] N. Dhananjay and D. Ghose, “Accurate Time-to-Go Estimation for Proportional Navigation Guidance,” J. of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol.37, pp. 1378-1383, 2014.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Apr. 22, 2024