Comparison of Baselines in Extraction of F-Responses
Ryoji Fukuda*, Aoi Honda**, Akiko Hachisuka***,
and Kenji Hachisuka***
*Oita University, 700 Dan-noharu, Oita 870-1192, Japan
**Kyushu Institute of Technology, 680-2 Kawazu, Iizuka, Fukuoka 820-8502, Japan
***University of Occupational and Environmental Health, 1-1 Iseigaoka, Yahatanishi-ku, Kitakyushu-city, Fukuoka 807-8555, Japan
The objective of this study is to eliminate slow responses that displace baselines positively. This is a key component of an automated technique for determining parameters of F-waves in an evoked potential obtained by limb stimulation. We investigate five methods and compare them to F-wave repeater data through visual observation by experts.
-  A. Morris and M. A. Fisher, “The contemporary role of F-wave studies. F-wave studies: Clinical utility,” Muscle & Nerve, Vol.21, No.8, pp. 1098-1101, 1998.
-  D. W. Stashuk, T. J. Joherty, A. Kassam, and W. F. Brown, “Motor unit number estimates based on the automated analysis of Fresponses,” Muscle & Nerve, Vol.17, No.8, pp. 881-890, 1994.
-  M. A. Fisher, “Comparison of automated and manual F-wave latency measurements,” Clinical neurophysiology, Vol.116, No.2, pp. 264-269, 2005.
-  B. H. Tracey, D. Iyer, E. A. Lesser, F. J. Potts, and S. N. Gozani, “Comparison of expert and algorithm agreement in measurement of nerve conduction study parameters,” Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, Vol.5, No.2, pp. 158-163, 2010.
This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationa License.