Top > JACIII > Action Selection for Game Play Agents Using Genetic Algorithms ...

single-jc.php

JACIII Vol.17 No.2 pp. 201-207
doi: 10.20965/jaciii.2013.p0201
(2013)

Development Report:

Views over last 60 days: 622

Action Selection for Game Play Agents Using Genetic Algorithms in Platform Game Computational Intelligence Competitions

Ken Hasegawa, Narutoshi Tanaka, Ryuji Emoto,
Yusuke Sugihara, Ardta Ngonphachanh, Junko Ichino,
and Tomonori Hashiyama

Graduate School of Information Systems, The University of Electro-Communications, 1-5-1 Chofugaoka, Chofu, Tokyo 182-8585, Japan

Received:
December 6, 2012
Accepted:
January 28, 2013
Published:
March 20, 2013
Creative Commons License
Keywords:
platform games, genetic algorithm, game play agent, competitions
Abstract
The application of computational intelligence (CI) and artificial intelligence (AI) to games has been attempted as a typical implementation of intelligent processing on computers. Intelligence in this sense is understood as the ability to search for the best solution efficiently among multiple options, specifically in AI playing board games such as chess. As the processing ability of computers increases, CI/AI systems are outperforming humans in finding potential solutions from a tremendous number of options within a short timeframe. These days, computer games are widely prevalent. CI/AI applications in computer games are focused on animating non-player characters (NPCs), whereas CI/AI applications in the scientific fields are focused on modeling intelligent human activities. The field of computer games faces many issues, such as dealing with dynamic environments that change quickly and processing images at higher resolutions and complexity. The use of computer games as a benchmark for CI/AI technologies has been attempted, and competitions involving various kinds of games have been held to encourage innovation in the field. In this paper, we describe a learning agent that participated in a platform game CI competition held in conjunction with Fuzzy System Symposium (FSS 2012). The approach adopted in this paper is a basic method based on conventional methods. The authors hope that this presentation of our development processes would encourage many researchers to participate in competitions and that it would contribute to progress in the field.
Cite this article as:
K. Hasegawa, N. Tanaka, R. Emoto, Y. Sugihara, A. Ngonphachanh, J. Ichino, and T. Hashiyama, “Action Selection for Game Play Agents Using Genetic Algorithms in Platform Game Computational Intelligence Competitions,” J. Adv. Comput. Intell. Intell. Inform., Vol.17 No.2, pp. 201-207, 2013.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] M. Campbell, A. J. Hoane Jr., and F. Hsu, “Deep Blue,” Artificial Intelligence, Vol.134, Issues 1-2, pp. 57-83, 2002. DOI: 10.1016S0004-3702(01)00129-1
  2. [2] T. Hartley and Q. Mehdi, “Online action adaptation in interactive computer games,” ACM Computers in Entertainment, Vol.7, No.2, Article No.28, p. 31, 2009. DOI: 10.11451541895.1541908
  3. [3] S. Karakovskiy and J. Togelius, “The Mario AI Benchmark and Competitions,” IEEE Trans. on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games, Vol.4, No.1, pp. 55-67, 2012.
  4. [4] G. N. Yannakakis, “Game AI revisited,” Proc. of the 9th Conf. on Computing Frontiers, pp. 285-292, 2012. DOI: 10.1145/2212908.2212954
  5. [5] N. Tanaka, R. Emoto, K. Hasegawa, Y. Sugihara, A. Ngonphachanh, J. Ichino, and T. Hashiyama, “A game play agent learns to play as if it is controlled by human player,” Proc. of 28th Fuzzy System Symposium, pp. 292-293, 2012 (in Japanese).
  6. [6] T. Takano, T. Ichimura, M. Kanoh, and M. Koshino, “The Platform Game CI Competition 2012 in Japan,” Proc. of 28th Fuzzy System Symposium, pp. 516-517, 2012 (in Japanese).
  7. [7] J. E. Laird, “Research in human-level AI using computer games,” Communications of the ACM, Vol.3, No.8, pp. 32-35, 2002.
  8. [8] S. M. Lucas, “Computational Intelligence and AI in Games: A New IEEE Transactions,” IEEE Trans. on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games, Vol.1, No.1, pp. 1-3, 2009.
  9. [9] J. Togelius, S. Karakovskiy, and R. Baumgarten, “The 2009 MarioAI competition,” Proc. IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, 2010. DOI: 10.1109/CEC.2010.5586133
  10. [10] J. Togelius, G. N. Yannakakis, B. Weber, T. Shimizu, T. Hashiyama et al., “The 2010 Mario AI Championship: Level Generation Track,” IEEE Trans. on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games, Vol.3, No.4, pp. 332-337, 2011.
  11. [11] T. Shimizu, T. Hashiyama, T. Esaki, J. Ichino, and S. Tano, “Online Level Generation using User Profiles to Keep the user in the Flow Channel,” Proc. of 27th Fuzzy System Symposium, pp. 557-562, 2011 (in Japanese).
  12. [12] J. Togelius, G. N. Yannakakis, S. Karakovskiy, and N. Shaker, “Assessing Believability,” Ch.9 in Believable Bots, P. Hingston (Ed.), pp. 215-230, Springer 2012. DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-32323-2_9
  13. [13] Platform Game CI Testbed package.
    http://www.marioai.org/gameplay-track/getting-started
  14. [14] T. Takano and M. Kanoh, “Platform Game AI Tutorial,” Proc. of 33rd Tokai Fuzzy Symposium (Gama-ken), 2012 (in Japanese).
  15. [15] S. Shinohara, T. Takano, H. Takase, H. Kawanaka, and S. Tsuruoka, “A discussion on planning method in platform game AI – A study of situation recognition for utilizing learning data –,” Proc. of 28th Fuzzy System Symposium, pp. 705-708, 2012 (in Japanese).
  16. [16] M. Maeda, H. Kanii, T. Nakamura, M. Kanoh, and K. Yamada, “Obtaining Action Rules for Game Agents with Evolutional Computation,” Proc. of 28th Fuzzy System Symposium, pp. 713-714, 2012 (in Japanese).
  17. [17] Result of Platform Game CI Competition 2012 in Japan.
    http://sns.j-soft.org/community/82/reference/22532
  18. [18] Mario AI Manual (in Japanese).
    http://www.media.is.uec.ac.jp/medialab-wp/imlab/resources/

Creative Commons License  This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationa License.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Oct. 01, 2024