single-jc.php

JACIII Vol.15 No.8 pp. 1039-1048
doi: 10.20965/jaciii.2011.p1039
(2011)

Paper:

Analysis of Driver Perceptions and Behavior When Driving in an Unfamiliar Traffic Regulation

Hidetoshi Nakayasu*1, Tetsuya Miyoshi*2, Nobuhiko Kondo*3,
Hirokazu Aoki*4, and Patrick Patterson*5

*1Faculty of Intelligence and Informatics, Konan University, 8-9-1 Okamoto Higashinada, Kobe, Hyogo 658-8501, Japan

*2Faculty of Business and Informatics, Toyohashi Sozo University, 20-1 Matsushita, Ushikawa, Toyohashi, Aichi 440-8511, Japan

*3Otemae University, Nishinomiya, Hyogo 662-8552, Japan

*4Hitachi, Ltd. Information & Telecommuniction System Company, Shinsuna Plaze 6-27, Shinsuna 1, Koto-ku, Tokyo 136-8632, Japan

*5Department of Industrial Engineering, Texas Tech University, 201 Industrial Engineering Building, Lubbock, TX, USA

Received:
February 21, 2011
Accepted:
July 12, 2011
Published:
October 20, 2011
Keywords:
human error, human-machine system, driving simulator, eye movements
Abstract

The relationships between eye movement and behavior when driving in situations of familiar and unfamiliar highway regulations was investigated using a driving simulator and an eye tracking system. The experimental system proposed in this paper is useful for analyzing human error induced from differing traffic regulations, specifically between Japan and USA scenarios. It was found, from the time histories of eye movements by synchronizing vehicle trajectories, the different traffic regulations of Japan and USA caused an overshooting when taking right turns and an undershooting when taking left turns. Such overshooting and undershooting may lead to head-on crashes. It was also noted that duration time and number of eye fixation during overshooting or undershooting increased when compared to situations without overshooting and undershooting.

Cite this article as:
Hidetoshi Nakayasu, Tetsuya Miyoshi, Nobuhiko Kondo,
Hirokazu Aoki, and Patrick Patterson, “Analysis of Driver Perceptions and Behavior When Driving in an Unfamiliar Traffic Regulation,” J. Adv. Comput. Intell. Intell. Inform., Vol.15, No.8, pp. 1039-1048, 2011.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] “What Sort of Human Errors Cause Traffic Accidents? –Focus on Mistake Assumption–,” Institute for Traffic Accident Research and Data Analysis (ITARDA) Information, No.33, 2001. (in Japanese)
  2. [2] Y. Nojiri, T. Kohda, and K. Inoue, “Cognitive Mechanism and Human Error Analysis,” Trans. of the Reliability Engineering Association of Japan, Vol.23, No.2, pp. 157-166, 2001. (in Japanese)
  3. [3] J. Reason, “Human Error,” p. 56, Cambridge University Press, 1990.
  4. [4] J. Rasmussen, “Skills, Rules, and Knowledge,” Signs and Symbols, and Other Distinctions in Human Performance Model, IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, SMC-13, Vol.3, pp. 257-266, 1983.
  5. [5] D. A. Norman, “The Psychology of Everyday Things,” Basic Books, pp. 169-186, 1988.
  6. [6] Honda Motor Co., Ltd. “Honda Driving Simulator.” Honda Home Page. (online), available from
    http://www.honda.co.jp/simulator/driving/shogen.html, (accessed 2009-05-06).
  7. [7] SR Research Ltd. “EyeLink II.” SR Research Complete Eye Tracking Solutions. (online), available from
    http://www.sr-research.com/EL_II.html, (accessed 2009-05-06).
  8. [8] The Vision Society of Japan (Eds.), “Handbook of visual information process,” pp. 393-398, 2001. (in Japanese)
  9. [9] “Handbook of visual information process,”pp. 91-92, 2001. (in Japanese)
  10. [10] S. K. Card, T. P. Moran, and A. Newell, “The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction,” Lawrence Erlbaum Associatespp, pp. 23-97, 1983.
  11. [11] H. Nakayasu, H. Aoki, T. Miyoshi, and P. Patterson, “Concurrent Study on Perception and Behavior of Driver in Simulated Driving,” Proc. The IADIS Interfaces and Numan Vomputer Interaction 2011, 2011.
  12. [12] “Psychology and Physiology of Human Error,” H. Yoshikawa (Ed.) CORONA Publishing Co. Ltd., pp. 96, 2006. (in Japanese)
  13. [13] T. Hamada, JM. Flandrin, N. Furuya, “Latent defect in monocular optokinetic nystagmus after neonatal removal of the lateral suprasylvian area in the cat,” Behavioral Brain Research, Vol.27, pp. 109-114, 1988.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Mar. 05, 2021