single-jc.php

JACIII Vol.14 No.7 pp. 793-801
doi: 10.20965/jaciii.2010.p0793
(2010)

Paper:

Role of Pre-Operation in Experiencing Differently Sized Hands

Kenji Terabayashi*, Natsuki Miyata**, Kazunori Umeda*,
and Jun Ota***

*Department of Precision Mechanics, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Chuo University, 1-13-27 Kasuga, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 112-8551, Japan

**Digital Human Research Center, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), 2-3-26 Aomi, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135-0064, Japan

***Research into Artifacts, Center for Engineering (RACE), The University of Tokyo, 5-1-5 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8568, Japan

Received:
April 1, 2010
Accepted:
August 7, 2010
Published:
November 20, 2010
Keywords:
pre-operation, differently sized hands, adaptation, asymmetric, body schema
Abstract

In this paper, we investigate pre-operations intended to adapt one to hands of controlled sizes when experiencing differently sized hands. Pre-operations are categorized into four types based on the relationship between a hand and an object. To quantify the degree of adaptation to differently sized hands, an index, called “Degree Of Immersion (DOI),” is defined. The index indicates the appropriateness of the observed behavior to the presented hand size. The DOI was measured to compare pre-operations when changing hands in size variously. The experimental comparisons led to two main points: (i) no pre-operation is required with decreasing hand size due to easy adaptation, (ii) a pre-operation, touching and controlling an object in position, is sufficiently effective for adapting larger hands. These points are important for design aid applications to assess usability of designing products by various users.

Cite this article as:
K. Terabayashi, N. Miyata, K. Umeda, and <. Ota, “Role of Pre-Operation in Experiencing Differently Sized Hands,” J. Adv. Comput. Intell. Intell. Inform., Vol.14, No.7, pp. 793-801, 2010.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] D. B. Chaffin, “Improving digital human modelling for proactive ergonomics in design,” Ergonomics, Vol.48, No.5, pp. 478-491, 2005.
  2. [2] M. Kouchi, N. Miyata, and M. Mochimaru, “An analysis of hand measurements for obtaining representative Japanese hand models,” In Proc. of SAE 2005 Digital Human Modeling for Design and Engineering Conf., 2005-01-2734, 2005.
  3. [3] N. Miyata, M. Kouchi, T. Kurihara, and M. Mochimaru, “Modeling of Human Hand Link Structure from Optical Motion Capture Data,” In Proc. of IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 2129-2135, 2004.
  4. [4] M. Bordegoni, G. Colomboa, and L. Formentinia, “Haptic technologies for the conceptual and validation phases of product design,” Computers & Graphics, Vol.30, No.3, pp. 377-390, 2006.
  5. [5] M. Tideman, M. C. v. d. Voort, and F. J. A. M. v. Houten, “Design and Evaluation of Virtual Gearshift Application,” In Proc. of IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, pp. 465-470, 2004.
  6. [6] J. C. Verlinden, A. d. Smit, A. W. J. Peeters, and M. H. v. Gelderen, “Development of a Flexible Augmented Prototyping System,” J. of WSCG, Vol.11, No.3, pp. 496-503, 2003.
  7. [7] K. Terabayashi, N. Miyata, and J. Ota, “Grasp Strategy when Experiencing Hands of Various Sizes,” eMinds: Int. J. on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol.1, No.4, pp. 55-74, 2008.
  8. [8] M. Costantini and P. Haggard, “The rubber hand illusion: Sensitivity and reference frame for body ownership,” Consciousness and Cognition, Vol.16, No.2, pp. 229-240, 2007.
  9. [9] K. C. Armel and V. S. Ramachandran, “Projecting sensations to external objects: evidence from skin conductance response,” Proc. of the Royal Society of London-B, Vol.270, No.1523, pp 1499-1506, 2003.
  10. [10] M. Botvinick and J. Cohen, “Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see,” Nature, Vol.391, p. 756, 1998.
  11. [11] A. Iriki, M. Tanaka, and Y. Iwamura, “Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones,” Neuroreport, Vol.7, Vol.14, pp. 2325-2326, 1996.
  12. [12] T. Shirai, M. Kaneko, K. Harada, and T. Tsuji, “Scale-Dependent Grasps,” In Proc. of the 3rd Int. Conf. on Advanced Mechatronics (ICAM’98), pp. 197-202, 1998.
  13. [13] Japanese body size data 1992-1994, Research Institute of Human Engineering for Quality Life (HQL), 1997. (in Japanese)
  14. [14] L. Peebles and B. Norris, ADULTDATA The Handbook of Adult Anthropometric and Strength Measurements – Data for Design Safety, Department of Trade and Industry, 1998.
  15. [15] V. S. Ramachandran and D. R. Ramachandran, “Phantom Limbs and Neural Plasticity,” Archives Neurology, Vol.57, No.3, pp. 317-320, 2000.
  16. [16] V. S. Ramachandran, D. R. Ramachandran, and S. Cobb, “Touch the phantom limb,” Nature, Vol.377, pp. 489-490, 2005.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Aug. 09, 2020