Top > JACIII > Evaluation of Appropriate Body Placement and Notification Moda ...

single-jc.php

JACIII Vol.11 No.1 pp. 111-117
doi: 10.20965/jaciii.2007.p0111
(2007)

Paper:

Views over last 60 days: 625

Evaluation of Appropriate Body Placement and Notification Modality of a Wearable Clip-on Notifier Using an Experimental Platform

Vlaho Kostov*, Eiichi Naito**, Takashi Tajima**, and Jun Ozawa**

*Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. (Panasonic), Corporate R&D, 1006 Kadoma, Kadoma-shi, Osaka 571-8501, Japan

**Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. (Panasonic), Advanced Technology Research Laboratories, 3-4 Hikaridai, Seika-cho, Soraku-gun, Kyoto 619-0237, Japan

Received:
April 7, 2006
Accepted:
June 30, 2006
Published:
January 20, 2007
Creative Commons License
Keywords:
ubiquitous network society, wearable life navigator, personal notifier
Abstract
We have designed and developed an experimental infrastructure capable of interacting with different wearable information terminals for delivery of timely push information based on the user profile. Focusing on the evaluation of the body placement, we have developed a wearable clip-on notifier which can be placed on different parts of the human body. It is a small accessory device capable of producing visual, buzzer-audio and tactile-vibrator effects with a natural and relatively small form-factor in a shape of a paper clip that can be attached or be worn as a pendant. In order to evaluate the best placement and modality for the clip-on notifier, we have selected a number of position candidates and have performed in-situ notification experiments while the subjects performed different activities. We have presented a good hierarchical system for subjective evaluation of the notifier placements, and our device was shown as potential solution for personalized information notification.
Cite this article as:
V. Kostov, E. Naito, T. Tajima, and J. Ozawa, “Evaluation of Appropriate Body Placement and Notification Modality of a Wearable Clip-on Notifier Using an Experimental Platform,” J. Adv. Comput. Intell. Intell. Inform., Vol.11 No.1, pp. 111-117, 2007.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] C. T. Chen and T. S. Wei, “An Information Push-delivery System Design for Personal Information Service on the Internet,” Information Processing and Management International Journal, Vol.39, No.6, Pergamon Press, pp. 873-888, 2003.
  2. [2] S. Kinoshita, T. Shiroshita, and T. Nagata, “The Real Push Network: A New Push-type Content Delivery System Using Reliable Multicasting,” IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, Vol.44, No.4, pp. 1216-1224, 1998.
  3. [3] M. G. Underwood, P. P. Maglio, and R. Barrett, “User Centered Push for Timely Information Delivery,” In Proc. of the 7th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW7), Brisbane, Australia, pp. 33-41, 1998.
  4. [4] L. Barkhuus and A. Dey, “Is Context Aware Computing Taking Control Away From the User? Three levels of Interactivity Examined,” In Proc. of UbiComp 2003, pp. 149-156, 2003.
  5. [5] M. Weiser, “The Computer for the 21st Century,” Scientific American, Vol.265, No.3, pp. 66-75, 1991.
  6. [6] B. Schilit, N. Adams, and R. Want, “Context Aware Computing Applications,” In Proc. of the 1st Int. Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, pp. 85-90, 1994.
  7. [7] K. Cheverst, N. Davies, and K. Mitchell, “Investigating Contextaware Information Push vs. Information Pull to Tourists,” In Proc. of Mobile HCI 2001, IHM-HCI 2001, pp. 1-6, 2001.
  8. [8] T. Erickson, “Some Problems with the Notion of Context-aware Computing: Ask not for whom the cell phone tolls,” Communications of the ACM, Vol.45, No.2, pp. 102-104, 2002.
  9. [9] P. Tarasewich, C. S. Campbell, T. Xia, and M. Didels, “Evaluation of Visual Notification Cues for Ubiquitous Computing,” UbiComp 2003, LNSC 2864, pp. 349-366, 2003.
  10. [10] N. Kern and B. Schiele, “Context-Aware Notification for Wearable Computing,” In Proc. of ISWC’03, pp. 223-230, 2003.
  11. [11] R. W. Lindeman, J. L. Sibert, C. E. Lathan, and J. M. Vice, “The Design and Deployment of a Wearable Vibrotactile Feedback System,” In Proc. of ISWC’04, pp. 56-59, 2004.
  12. [12] K. Tsukada and M. Yasumura, “ActiveBelt: Belt-type Wearable Tactile Display for Directional Navigation,” In Proc. of UbiComp 2004, pp. 384-399, 2004.
  13. [13] V. Kostov, J. Ozawa, and S. Matsuura, “Analysis of Wearable Interface Factors for Appropriate Information Notification,” In Proc. of IEEE ISWC‘04, pp. 102-109, 2004.
  14. [14] R. Likert, “A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes,” Archives of Psychology, No.140, p. 55, 1932.
  15. [15] J. Brooke, “SUS: A Quick and Dirty Usability Scale,” In P. W. Jordan, B. Thomas, B. A. Weerdmeester, and I. L. McClelland (Eds.), Usability Evaluation in Industry, pp. 189-194, London, UK, Taylor & Francis, 1996.
  16. [16] F. Gemperle, C. Kasabach, J. Stivoric, M. Bauer, and R. Martin, “Design for Wearability,” In Proc. of ISWC’98, Digest of Papers, pp. 116-122, 1998.
  17. [17] Y. Kishino et al., “Bloom Accessory: Accessories Using LEDs with Remote Control,” in Proc. of ISWC’04, pp. 180-181, 2004.
  18. [18] O. Amft, M. Lauffer, S. Ossevoort, F. Macaluso, P. Lukowicz, and G. Troester, “Design of the QBIC Wearable Computing Platform,” In Proc. of IEEE ASAP’04, pp. 398-410, 2004.

Creative Commons License  This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationa License.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Apr. 18, 2024