Research Paper:
A Flexible Differential Angle Sensor for Calibration of Linear Scale Gratings with Different Pitches
Jiucheng Wu*, Dong Wook Shin**,
, Chenguang Yin*, Ryo Sato*
, and Wei Gao*

*Department of Finemechanics, Tohoku University
6-6-01 Aramaki Aza-Aoba, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8579, Japan
**Division of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Hokkaido University
Sapporo, Japan
Corresponding author
The accurate evaluation of pitch deviations in scale gratings is essential to ensure the performance of high-precision positioning systems, such as optical encoders and machine tools. Conventional methods, including interferometry and microscopy, provide high resolution but are limited by a restricted measurement range, environmental sensitivity, and poor suitability for in-situ applications. To address these challenges, this paper presents a differential angle sensor that can detect the angles of ±1st-order diffracted beams from a scale grating for pitch deviation calibration of the scale grating. The developed sensor employs a pair of adjustable plane mirrors and a single CMOS image sensor to capture ±1st-order diffracted beams simultaneously. This configuration eliminates the need for multiple detectors and complex symmetric optics, reducing structural complexity while maintaining high sensitivity. More importantly, gratings of different pitches can be accommodated by simple shifts of mirror positions without reconfiguring the optical structure. The method was validated in two stages. First, comparative experiments with a 1.6 µm-pitch grating confirmed that the configuration achieved stability and sensitivity comparable to conventional layouts. Short-range bidirectional scanning and long-range measurements up to 90 mm showed excellent agreement with reference data from a commercial Fizeau interferometer. Second, adaptability tests on a scale grating with a different pitch of 8 µm demonstrated that lateral mirror translation preserved measurement stability and angular sensitivity, confirming the capability to evaluate multiple gratings without structural modification. These results show that the system attains accuracy equivalent to that of interferometric methods while offering significant advantages in simplicity, adaptability, and suitability for in-situ industrial calibration. This paper highlights a practical, cost-effective approach for high-precision evaluation of linear scale gratings.
- [1] W. Gao, S.-W. Kim, H. Bosse, and K. Minoshima, “Dimensional metrology based on ultrashort pulse laser and optical frequency comb,” CIRP Annals, Vol.74, No.2, pp. 993-1018, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2025.04.094
- [2] A. Archenti, W. Gao, A. Donmez, E. Savio, and N. Irino, “Integrated metrology for advanced manufacturing,” CIRP Annals, Vol.73, pp. 639-665, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2024.05.003
- [3] H. Yu, X. Chen, C. Liu, G. Cai, and W. Wang, “A survey on the grating-based optical position encoder,” Optics & Laser Technology, Vol.143, Article No.107352, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2021.107352
- [4] S. Wang, L. Luo, and X. Li, “Design and parameter optimization of zero position code considering diffraction based on deep learning generative adversarial networks,” Nanomanufacturing and Metrology, Vol.7, Article No.2, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41871-023-00221-6
- [5] B. Muhutijiang, W. Wei, and K. Qiu, “A new method for non-destructive measuring of grating parameters,” Proc. SPIE, Vol.11188, Article No.1118825, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2537840
- [6] V. I. Korotkov, S. A. Pul’kin, A. L. Vitushkin, and L. F. Vitushkin, “Laser interferometric diffractometry for measurements of diffraction grating spacing,” Applied Optics, Vol.35, No.24, pp. 4782-4790, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.35.004782
- [7] X. Chen, Y. Shimizu, X. Xiong, Y.-L. Chen, and W. Gao, “Self-calibration of Fizeau interferometer and planar scale gratings in Littrow setup,” Optics Express, Vol.25, No.18, pp. 21567-21582, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.25.021567
- [8] F. Meli and R. Thalmann, “Long-range AFM profiler used for accurate pitch measurements,” Measurement Science and Technology, Vol.9, No.7, pp. 1087-1092, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/9/7/014
- [9] G. Ahn, Y.-Y. Choi, D. J. Miller, H. Song, K. No, and S. Hong, “Measurement anomaly of step width in calibration grating using atomic force microscopy,” arXiv:1909.09508, 2019. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1909.09508
- [10] W. Gao and A. Kimura, “A fast evaluation method for pitch deviation and out-of-flatness of a planar scale grating,” CIRP Annals, Vol.59, No.1, pp. 505-508, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2010.03.035
- [11] R. García and R. Pérez, “Dynamic atomic force microscopy methods,” Surface Science Reports, Vol.47, Nos.6-8, pp. 197-301, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5729(02)00077-8
- [12] T. Kitazume, N. Tashiro, Y. Yamazaki, and Y. Shimizu, “Validation of pitch deviation measurement of a diffraction scale grating using robust and highly-sensitive optical angle sensors,” Precision Engineering, Vol.96, pp. 874-883, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2025.08.003
- [13] W. H. Lee, “High-efficiency multiple beam gratings,” Applied Optics, Vol.18, No.13, pp. 2152-2158, 1979. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.18.002152
- [14] L. Zhu, F. Mehdizadeh, and R. Talebzadeh, “Application of photonic-crystal-based nonlinear ring resonators for realizing an all-optical comparator,” Applied Optics, Vol.58, pp. 8316-8321, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.58.008316
- [15] W. Gao and Y. Shimizu, “Optical metrology for precision engineering,” De Gruyter, 2021.
- [16] L. Quan, Y. Shimizu, X. Xiong, H. Matsukuma, and W. Gao, “A new method for evaluation of the pitch deviation of a linear scale grating by an optical angle sensor,” Precision Engineering, Vol.67, pp. 1-13, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2020.09.008
- [17] L. Quan, Y. Shimizu, R. Sato, D. W. Shin, H. Matsukuma, A. Archenti, and W. Gao, “Design and testing of a compact optical angle sensor for pitch deviation measurement of a scale grating with a small angle of diffraction,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.16, No.5, pp. 572-581, 2022. https://doi.org/10.20965/ijat.2022.p0572
- [18] J. Wu, Y. Hong, D. W. Shin, R. Sato, L. Quan, H. Matsukuma, and W. Gao, “On-machine calibration of pitch deviations of a linear scale grating by using a differential angle sensor,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.18, No.1, pp. 4-10, 2024. https://doi.org/10.20965/ijat.2024.p0004
- [19] Z. M, Odibat and N. T. Shawagfeh, “Generalized Taylor’s formula,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, Vol.186, Issue 1, pp. 286-293, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2006.07.102
- [20] W. Ma, J. Li, S. Liu, Y. Han, X. Liu, Z. Wang, and C. Jiang, “An autocollimator axial measurement method based on the strapdown inertial navigation system,” Sensors, Vol.24, No.8, Article No.2590, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24082590
- [21] L. P. Salles and D. W. de Lima Monteiro, “Designing the response of an optical quad-cell as position-sensitive detector,” IEEE Sensors J., Vol.10, No.2, pp. 286-293, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2009.2033806
- [22] W. Gao, S. W. Kim, H. Bosse, H. Haitjema, Y. L. Chen, X. D. Lu, W. Knapp, A. Weckenmann, W. T. Estler, and H. Kunzmann, “Measurement technologies for precision positioning,” CIRP Annals, Vol.64, No.2, pp. 773-796, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2015.05.009
- [23] M. Born and E. Wolf, “Principles of optics: Electromagnetic theory of propagation, interference and diffraction of light,” 7th edition, Cambridge University Press, 1999.
This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationa License.