single-au.php

IJAT Vol.19 No.5 pp. 793-800
doi: 10.20965/ijat.2025.p0793
(2025)

Research Paper:

Flexible 5-Axis Machining with Toolpath Compensation Based on Workpiece Setting Error

Daisuke Narita, Zongwei Ren ORCID Icon, and Hayato Yoshioka ORCID Icon

Institute of Industrial Science, The University of Tokyo
4-6-1 Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8505, Japan

Corresponding author

Received:
March 7, 2025
Accepted:
July 2, 2025
Published:
September 5, 2025
Keywords:
setting error, 3D scanner, error compensation, 5-axis machining
Abstract

Although near-net-shape machining offers significant advantages, it presents a notable challenge due to the complexity of the pre-finishing geometries. This complicates the workpiece setting during the finishing process. To address this problem, a measurable reference surface with a touch probe is typically employed. Furthermore, the workpiece is repeatedly reset until the setting error falls within the acceptable tolerance. Alternatively, a custom jig is designed and fabricated to mitigate setting errors. However, both approaches result in increased labor and extended time. Therefore, a novel method is proposed in this study wherein the setting position of a workpiece is measured using a 3D scanner. The setting error relative to the ideal setting position is calculated, and the toolpath is adjusted accordingly based on this error. This proposed method facilitates machining without the need for resetting, including when errors occur during the setting of workpieces that lack a reference plane or have intricate geometries. Moreover, the effectiveness of the proposed method was validated through simultaneous 5-axis machining utilizing the setting error compensation method.

Cite this article as:
D. Narita, Z. Ren, and H. Yoshioka, “Flexible 5-Axis Machining with Toolpath Compensation Based on Workpiece Setting Error,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.19 No.5, pp. 793-800, 2025.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] W. Gao et al., “The status, challenges, and future of additive manufacturing in engineering,” CAD Comput. Aided Des., Vol.69, pp. 65-89, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2015.04.001
  2. [2] M. Cortina, J. I. Arrizubieta, J. E. Ruiz, E. Ukar, and A. Lamikiz, “Latest developments in industrial hybrid machine tools that combine additive and subtractive operations,” Materials, Vol.11, No.12, Article No.2583, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11122583
  3. [3] M. P. Sealy, G. Madireddy, R. E. Williams, P. Rao, and M. Toursangsaraki, “Hybrid processes in additive manufacturing,” J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., Vol.140, No.6, Article No.060801, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4038644
  4. [4] S. H. Kim, T. J. Ko, and J. H. Ahn, “Elimination of settling error due to clamping forces in on-machine measurement,” Int. J. of Adv. Manuf. Technol., Vol.19, pp. 573-578, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001700200062
  5. [5] A. Raghu and S. N. Melkote, “Modeling of workpiece location error due to fixture geometric error and fixture-workpiece compliance,” J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., Vol.127, No.1, pp. 75-83, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1828052
  6. [6] C. H. Xiong, M. Y. Wang, and Y. L. Xiong, “On clamping planning in workpiece-fixture systems,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng., Vol.5, No.3, pp. 407-419, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2008.921483
  7. [7] S. W. Zhu, G. F. Ding, S. W. Ma, K. Y. Yan, and S. F. Qin, “Workpiece locating error prediction and compensation in fixtures,” Int. J. of Adv. Manuf. Technol., Vol.67, Nos.5-8, pp. 1423-1432, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4578-1
  8. [8] O. Gonzalo et al., “A method to minimize the workpiece deformation using a concept of intelligent fixture,” Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf., Vol.48, pp. 209-218, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2017.04.005
  9. [9] K. Kurc et al., “Application of a 3D scanner in robotic measurement of aviation components,” Electronics, Vol.11, No.19, Article No.3216, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11193216
  10. [10] R. H. Helle and H. G. Lemu, “A case study on use of 3D scanning for reverse engineering and quality control,” Mater. Today: Proc., Vol.45, Part 6, pp. 5255-5262, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.828
  11. [11] C. Afteni, V. Paunoiu, M. Afteni, and V. Teodor, “Using 3D scanning in assessing the dimensional accuracy of mechanically machined parts,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., Vol.1235, No.1, Article No.012071, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1235/1/012071
  12. [12] S. Rusinkiewicz and M. Levoy, “Efficient variants of the ICP algorithm,” Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. 3-D Digit. Imaging Model., pp. 145-152, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1109/IM.2001.924423
  13. [13] R. B. Rusu, N. Blodow, and M. Beetz, “Fast point feature histograms (FPFH) for 3D registration,” 2009 IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom., pp. 3212-3217, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.2009.5152473
  14. [14] P. Wu, W. Li, and M. Yan, “3D scene reconstruction based on improved ICP algorithm,” Microprocess. Microsyst., Vol.75, Article No.103064, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpro.2020.103064
  15. [15] Y. Zhong, “Intrinsic shape signatures: A shape descriptor for 3D object recognition,” 2009 IEEE 12th Int. Conf. Comput. Vis. Workshops, ICCV Workshops, pp. 689-696, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCVW.2009.5457637
  16. [16] R. B. Rusu, Z. C. Marton, N. Blodow, and M. Beetz, “Persistent point feature histograms for 3D point clouds,” W. Burgard, R. Dillmann, C. Plagemann, and N. Vahrenkamp (Eds.), “Intelligent Autonomous Systems 10,” pp. 119-128, IOS Press, 2008. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-58603-887-8-119

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Sep. 05, 2025