single-au.php

IJAT Vol.16 No.2 pp. 157-166
doi: 10.20965/ijat.2022.p0157
(2022)

Paper:

Measurement of Machine Tool Two-Dimensional Error Motions Using Direction-Regulated Laser Interferometers

Daichi Maruyama, Soichi Ibaraki, and Ryoma Sakata

Graduate School of Advanced Science and Engineering, Hiroshima University
1-4-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-hiroshima, Hiroshima 739-8511, Japan

Corresponding author

Received:
September 4, 2021
Accepted:
November 19, 2021
Published:
March 5, 2022
Keywords:
machine tool, geometric errors, laser interferometer, laser tracker
Abstract

The volumetric accuracy of a machine tool generally changes with time. Its periodic check, performed at a user’s site in a semi-automated manner, can be a key to ensure a sufficient volumetric accuracy in the long term. A laser interferometer can only measure the linear positioning error motion of a linear axis. This paper proposes a scheme to identify all the two-dimensional (2D) error motions of two linear axes in a plane based on a set of distance measurements using only a laser interferometer. Unlike conventional tracking interferometers, the proposed scheme requires only a numerically controlled rotary table on which a laser interferometer is mounted. It regulates the laser beam direction based on the command target position in an open-loop control manner. This paper presents an algorithm to identify 2D error motions of two linear axes by performing only a single tracking test, in addition to the direct measurement of linear positioning error motions of two linear axes. The experimental comparison of the estimated error motions with their direct measurements is presented. The uncertainty analysis is also presented.

Cite this article as:
D. Maruyama, S. Ibaraki, and R. Sakata, “Measurement of Machine Tool Two-Dimensional Error Motions Using Direction-Regulated Laser Interferometers,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.16, No.2, pp. 157-166, 2022.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] ISO 230-1:2012, “Test code for machine tools – Part 1: Geometric accuracy of machines operating under no-load or quasi-static conditions,” 2012.
  2. [2] J. Mayr, J. Jedrzejewski, E. Uhlmann, M. A. Donmez, W. Knapp, F. Hartig, K. Wendt, T. Moriwaki, P. Shore, E. Schmitt, C. Brecher, T. Wurz, and K. Wegener, “Thermal issues in machine tools,” CIRP Annals, Vol.61, No.2, pp. 771-791, 2012.
  3. [3] M. Reuss, A. Dadalau, and A. Verl, “Friction Variances of Linear Machine Tool Axes,” Procedia CIRP, Vol.4, pp. 115-119, 2012.
  4. [4] K. Mori, D. Kono, and A. Matsubara, “A robust level error estimation method for machine tool installation,” Precision Engineering, Vol.58, pp. 70-76, 2019.
  5. [5] S. Ibaraki and W. Knapp, “Indirect Measurement of Volumetric Accuracy for Three-Axis and Five-Axis Machine Tools: A Review,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.6, No.2, pp. 110-124, doi: 10.20965/ijat.2012.p0110, 2012.
  6. [6] S. Weikert, “R-Test, a New Device for Accuracy Measurements on Five Axis Machine Tools,” CIRP Annals, Vol.53, No.1, pp. 429-432, 2004.
  7. [7] S. Ibaraki, C. Oyama, and H. Otsubo, “Construction of an error map of rotary axes on a five-axis machining center by static R-test,” Int. J. of Machine Tools and Manufacture, Vol.51, No.3, pp. 190-200, 2011.
  8. [8] ISO 230-3:2020, “Test code for machine tools – Part 3: Determination of thermal effects,” 2020.
  9. [9] K. Iwata, K. Fujimoto, and S. Nakamura, “Improvement and stabilization of spatial accuracy of whole processing area by three-dimensional spatial error correction system in milling machine,” Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Technical Review, Vol.57, No.3, pp. 1-3, 2020.
  10. [10] Y.-Q. Wang, J.-K. Wu, H.-B. Liu, K. Kang, and K. Liu, “Geometric accuracy long-term continuous monitoring using strain gauges for CNC machine tools,” Int. J. of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol.98, pp. 1145-1153, 2018.
  11. [11] F. Aggogeri, A. Borboni, R. Faglia, A. Merlo, and N. Pellegrini, “A Kinematic Model to Compensate the Structural Deformations in Machine Tools Using Fiber Bragg Grating (FBG) Sensors,” Applied Sciences, Vol.7, No.2, Article No.114, 2017.
  12. [12] ISO/TR 230-11:2018, “Test code for machine tools – Part 11: Measuring instruments suitable for machine tool geometry tests,” 2018.
  13. [13] H. Schwenke, M. Franke, J. Hannaford, and H. Kunzmann, “Error mapping of CMMs and machine tools by a single tracking interferometer,” CIRP Annals, Vol.54, No.1, pp. 475-478, 2005.
  14. [14] S. Ibaraki, T. Kudo, T. Yano, T. Takatsuji, S. Osawa, and O. Sato, “Estimation of three-dimensional volumetric errors of machining centers by a tracking interferometer,” Precision Engineering, Vol.39, pp. 179-186, 2014.
  15. [15] S. Ibaraki, G. Sato, and K. Takeuchi, “‘Open-loop’ tracking interferometer for machine tool volumetric error measurement – Two-dimensional case,” Precision Engineering, Vol.38, No.3, pp. 666-672, 2014.
  16. [16] S. Ibaraki, K. Nagae, and G. Sato, “Proposal of ‘open-loop’ tracking interferometer for machine tool volumetric error measurement,” CIRP Annals, Vol.63, No.1, pp. 501-503, 2014.
  17. [17] S. Ibaraki and K. Tsuboi, “‘Open-loop’ tracking interferometer measurement using rotary axes of a five-axis machine tool,” IEEE/ASME Trans. on Mechatronics, Vol.22, No.5, pp. 2342-2350, 2017.
  18. [18] S. Ibaraki, P. Blaser, M. Shimoike, N. Takayama, M. Nakaminami, and Y. Ido, “Measurement of thermal influence on a two-dimensional motion trajectory using a tracking interferometer,” CIRP Annals, Vol.65, No.1, pp. 483-486, 2016.
  19. [19] S. Ibaraki and M. Hiruya, “A novel scheme to measure 2D error motions of linear axes by regulating the direction of a laser interferometer,” Precision Engineering, Vol.67, pp. 152-159, 2021.
  20. [20] H.-C. Möhring, P. Wiederkehr, K. Erkorkmaz, and Y. Kakinuma, “Self-optimizing machining systems,” CIRP Annals, Vol.69, No.2, pp. 740-763, 2020.
  21. [21] T. Takatsuji, M. Goto, S. Osawa, R. Yin, and T. Kurosawa, “Whole-viewing-angle cat’s-eye retroreflector as a target of laser trackers,” Measurement Science and Technology, Vol.10, No.7, pp. 87-90, 1999.
  22. [22] JCGM 101:2008, “Evaluation of measurement data – Supplement 1 to the Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement – Propagation of distributions using a Monte Carlo method,” 2008.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Dec. 02, 2022