IJAT Vol.16 No.2 pp. 149-156
doi: 10.20965/ijat.2022.p0149


Reduction of the Influence of Non-Repeatable Run-Out in X-Y Plane of Machining Surface

Yuta Showa*,† and Hayato Yoshioka**

*Makino Milling Machine Co., Ltd.
4023 Nakatsu, Aikawa-machi, Aiko-gun, Kanagawa 243-0303, Japan

Corresponding author

**Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Japan

September 2, 2021
November 24, 2021
March 5, 2022
NRRO, rolling bearing, excitation, spindle

In recent years, the quality of the machined surfaces of molds for optical or medical instruments has needed improvement, and the fabrication of mirrored surfaces by means of cutting only has been gaining in importance. In order to obtain smooth surfaces, it is necessary to reduce various vibrations in the machine tool during the machining process. Many factors cause vibration in a machine tool, including feed mechanisms, pumps, and chatter. A high-speed spindle for precision machining is one source of vibration, but it is a challenge to avoid the non-repeatable run-out (NRRO) of a spindle. This study has developed an excitation system that can reduce the influence of non-repeatable run-out on machining surfaces. This paper presents a newly-developed excitation system with an excitation unit for each the X and Y direction. The excitation units consist of a voice coil motor and leaf springs, fixed on a spindle head. The tool run-out and vibration of the spindle head are measured by a displacement sensor and an acceleration sensor fixed on the spindle head, and their NRRO components are obtained through extraction using band-pass filters. By using these NRRO components as feedback signals, the excitation unit generates the force to cancel the NRRO of the tool. In order to determine the performance of the developed system, experimental evaluation was performed on a vertical 3-axis machining center. Since the spindle used for evaluation had three bearings, the measured NRRO of the tool had three peaks in the frequency domain. First, we conducted evaluation experiments under non-machining conditions, and all NRRO peaks were reduced by applying the developed system. Furthermore, there was no interference of the excitation units in the X and Y directions. Next, we evaluated the influence of the NRRO of the tool on the machining surface under finish machining conditions. The reduction in NRRO components in the measured surface profiles was observed through feedback. It was concluded that the developed system can reduce the influence of NRRO on machining surfaces.

Cite this article as:
Y. Showa and H. Yoshioka, “Reduction of the Influence of Non-Repeatable Run-Out in X-Y Plane of Machining Surface,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.16 No.2, pp. 149-156, 2022.
Data files:
  1. [1] S. Takasu, M. Masuda, and T. Nishiguchi, “Influence of steady vibration with small amplitude upon surface roughness in diamond machining,” CIRP Annals, Vol.34, No.1, pp. 463-467, 1985.
  2. [2] N. Suzuki, T. Ikada, R. Hino, and E. Shamoto, “Comprehensive study on milling conditions to avoid forced / self-excited chatter vibrations,” J. of the Japan Society for Precision Engineering, Vol.75, No.7, pp. 908-914, 2009 (in Japanese).
  3. [3] N. Suzuki, T. Kojima, R. Hino, and E. Shamoto, “A novel design method of irregular pitch cutters to attain simultaneous suppression of multi-mode regenerations,” Procedia CIRP, Vol.4, pp. 98-102, 2002.
  4. [4] R. Kleinwort, J. Platz, and M. F. Zaeh, “Adaptive active vibration control for machine tools with highly position-dependent dynamics,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.12, No.5, pp. 631-641, 2018.
  5. [5] J. Monnin, F. Kuster, and K. Wegener, “Modeling errors influencing active structural methods for chatter mitigation in milling process,” Procedia CIRP, Vol.14, pp. 494-499, 2014.
  6. [6] A. Matsubara, M. Maeda, and I. Yamaji, “Vibration suppression of boring bar by piezoelectric actuators and LR circuit,” CIRP Annals, Vol.63, No.1, pp. 372-376, 2014.
  7. [7] X. Beaudaert, K. Erkorkmaz, and J. Munoa, “Portable damping system for chatter suppression on flexible workpieces,” CIRP Annals, Vol.68, No.1, pp. 423-426, 2019.
  8. [8] S. Mitsuhashi, K, Nakamoto, K. Adachi, and K. Shirase, “A study on chatter vibration avoidance by smart balancing spindle using magnetic fluid,” Proc. of the Manufacturing & Machine Tool Conf., Vol.2008.7 A29, pp. 211-212, 2008 (in Japanese).
  9. [9] Y. Nakano and H. Takahara, “Countermeasure against regenerative chatter in end milling operations with vibration absorbers,” Proc. ASME Int. Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition (IMECE), Vol.13, pp. 157-166, 2010.
  10. [10] M. Oda, T. Torihara, E. Kondo, and N. Kumazawa, “Feasibility study of a hybrid spindle system with ball and active magnetic bearings for quadrant glitch compensation during end milling,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.13, No.3, pp. 432-439, 2019.
  11. [11] K. Mori, D. Kono, I. Yamaji, and A. Matsubara, “Modelling of viscoelastic damper support for reduction in low frequency residual vibration in machine tools,” Precision Engineering, Vol.50, pp. 313-319, 2017.
  12. [12] T. Fujita, S. Fukuhisa, N. Murai, Y. Takahashi, and K. Katayama, “Active microtremor isolation system using linear motors,” Trans. of the JSME, Series C, Vol.56, No.523, pp. 628-633, 1990 (in Japanese).
  13. [13] S. Noguchi, Y. Sato, T. Nogi, and T. Kanada, “Influence of inclination error on non repetitive run-out of the single ball bearing,” Trans. of the JSME, Series C, Vol.78, No.785, pp. 272-281, 2012 (in Japanese).
  14. [14] H. Shibahara, M. Kumagai, S. Kohda, and K. Okuda, “Influence of tool run-out on mold surface texture,” J. of the Japan Society for Abrasive Technology, Vol.53, No.4, pp. 230-235, 2009 (in Japanese).
  15. [15] H. Takii, “The present state and the future of ball bearings for high speed application,” J. of the Japan Society for Precision Engineering, Vol.67, No.7, pp. 1083-1085, 2001 (in Japanese).
  16. [16] Y. Showa, H. Yoshioka, and H. Shinno, “Reduction of the influence on machining surface caused by tool non-repeatable run-out of rolling bearing spindle for machine tools (Development of an excitation system),” Trans. of the JSME, Vol.86, No.884, 2020 (in Japanese).
  17. [17] Y. Showa and H. Yoshioka, “Reduction of the influence on machining surface caused by tool non-repeatable run-out of rolling bearing spindle for machine tools (Evaluation of effectiveness of NRRO reduction on machining surface by an excitation system),” Proc. of Int. Conf. on Precision Engineering, Vol.2020.18, 2020.
  18. [18] Y. Showa and H. Yoshioka, “Reduction of the influence on machining surface caused by tool non-repeatable run-out of rolling bearing spindle for machine tools (Improvement of machining surface quality with an excitation system),” Trans. of the JSME, Vol.87, No.894, 20-00343, 2021 (in Japanese).
  19. [19] ISO 230-7:2015, “Test code for machine tools Part 7: Geometric accuracy of axes of rotation,” 2015.
  20. [20] S. Noguchi and Y. Azeyanagi, “The Influence of radial loads on the ball revolution behavior in ball bearing,” Trans. of the JSME, Series C, Vol.73, No.735, pp. 3063-3068, 2007 (in Japanese).

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Apr. 05, 2024