IJAT Vol.14 No.6 pp. 975-983
doi: 10.20965/ijat.2020.p0975


Evaluation of Environmental Impact of Car Sharing in Consideration of Uncertainty of Influential Variables

Katsuya Tsuji, Kiyo Kurisu, Jun Nakatani, and Yuichi Moriguchi

Department of Urban Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo
7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan

Corresponding author

April 1, 2020
August 29, 2020
November 5, 2020
car sharing, Monte Carlo simulation, rebound effect, environmental impact

Sustainable production and consumption are categorized as target 12 in the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals. The “sharing economy” has been developing globally as a new consumption style, and it is often recognized as being environmentally friendly by both consumers and service providers. Several aspects of the practice, such as the avoidance of new production, can reduce the impact to the environment. However, additional factors, such as the expansion of consumption, namely rebound effects, can increase the impact to the environment. Although many variables exist to determine the total impact of sharing services on the environment, additional and rebound effects and the uncertainty of influential variables have not been well considered. In this study, we aim to reveal the conditions that car-sharing practices place in increasing or decreasing environmental loads, and to identify the significant influential factors on the environment imposed by car-sharing services. We analyze the CO2 emission of car sharing by considering various influential factors and their distributions. Furthermore, we consider differences in car size, fuel type, ownership condition, and several other factors in the simulation. The distribution of each variable is determined, and a Monte Carlo simulation is conducted. The CO2 emissions from the production and operational stages over a 10-y period are estimated. The simulation is conducted with sensitivity analysis to identify the variables that contribute significantly to the total CO2 emission. In some cases, the CO2 emission involved in car sharing exceeded cases in which car sharing is not practiced. Among those cases, although the main contributor to the total CO2 emission is in the operational stage, CO2 emission from the production stage increased the amount of emission. It is discovered that the number of cars increased significantly during the target 10 y after sharing is introduced in some cases. These results indicate a high probability that car sharing can achieve CO2 reduction, but the increase in CO2 emission can occur under certain conditions. Additionally, the sensitivity analysis shows that the main determinants of CO2 emission are the ratio of people who eliminated their private cars, degree of rebound effect, and increasing ratio of number of cars introduced to car-sharing practices. This suggests that whether car sharing becomes environmentally friendly depends substantially on consumer behavior and the manner in which sharing services are operated.

Cite this article as:
K. Tsuji, K. Kurisu, J. Nakatani, and Y. Moriguchi, “Evaluation of Environmental Impact of Car Sharing in Consideration of Uncertainty of Influential Variables,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.14 No.6, pp. 975-983, 2020.
Data files:
  1. [1] R. Meijkamp, “Changing Consumer Behavior through Eco-efficient Services: An Empirical Study of Car Sharing in the Netherlands,” Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol.7, No.4, pp. 234-244, 1998.
  2. [2] D. Demailly and A.-S. Novel, “The Sharing Economy: Make it Sustainable,” [Accessed March 19, 2020]
  3. [3] B. Zamani, G. Sandin, and G. M. Peters, “Life Cycle Assessment of Clothing Libraries: Can Collaborative Consumption Reduce the Environmental Impact of Fast Fashion?,” J. of Cleaner Production, Vol.162, pp. 1368-1375, 2017.
  4. [4] Y. Kishita and Y. Umeda, “Development of Japan’s Photovoltaic Deployment Scenarios in 2030,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.11, No.4, pp. 583-591, 2017.
  5. [5] K. Romejko and M. Nakano, “Life Cycle Analysis of Emissions from Electric and Gasoline Vehicles in Different Regions,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.11, No.4, pp. 572-582, 2017.
  6. [6] G. Doka and S. Ziegler, “Complete Life Cycle Assessment for Vehicle Models of the Mobility CarSharing Fleet Switzerland,” Conf. Paper of 1st Swiss Transport Research Conf., 2000.
  7. [7] E. W. Martin and S. A. Shaheen, “Greenhouse Gas Emission Impacts of Carsharing in North America,” IEEE Trans. on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol.12, No.4, pp. 1074-1086, 2011.
  8. [8] E. Martin, S. Shaheen, and J. Lidicker, “The Impact of Carsharing on Household Vehicle Holdings: Results from a North American Shared-Use Vehicle Survey,” Transportation Research Record: J. of the Transportation Research Board, Vol.2143, No.1, pp. 150-158, 2010.
  9. [9] E. Martin and S. Shaheen, “The Impact of Carsharing on Public Transit and Non-Motorized Travel: An Exploration of North American Carsharing Survey Data,” Energies, Vol.4, No.11, pp. 2094-2114, 2011.
  10. [10] L. Sioui, C. Morency, and M. Trépanier, “How Carsharing Affects the Travel Behavior of Households: A Case Study of Montréal, Canada,” Int. J. of Sustainable Transportation, Vol.7, No.11, pp. 52-69, 2013.
  11. [11] P. Baptista, S. Melo, and C. Rolim, “Energy, Environmental and Mobility Impacts of Car-sharing Systems. Empirical Results from Lisbon, Portugal,” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol.111, pp. 28-37, 2014.
  12. [12] J. Firnkorn and M. Müller, “What Will be the Environmental Effects of New Free-floating Car-sharing Systems? The Case of car2go in Ulm,” Ecological Economics, Vol.70, No.8, pp. 1519-1528, 2011.
  13. [13] T. Briceno, G. Peters et al., “Using Life Cycle Approaches to Evaluate Sustainable Consumption Programs: Car-sharing,” Industrial Ecology Programme, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Working Paper No.2, 2005.
  14. [14] T. D. Chen and K. M. Kockelman, “Carsharing’s Life-cycle Impacts on Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions,” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol.47, pp. 276-284, 2016.
  15. [15] Y. Kudoh, K. Nansai et al., “Life Cycle CO2 Emissions of FCEV, BEV and GV in Actual Use,” The 23rd Int. Electric Vehicle Symp. and Exposition, EVS 23 (Battery, Hybrid, Fuel Cell) Conf. Proc. (CD-ROM), 2007.
  16. [16] Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, “Final report on 2015 fuel efficiency standards,” (in Japanese). [Accessed March 19, 2020]
  17. [17] K. Yabe, T. Tokami et al., “The Distribution of Daily Drive Length and CO2 Reduction Effect by PHEVs,” J. of Japan Society of Energy and Resources, Vol.32, No.4, pp. 18-24, 2011 (in Japanese with English abstract).
  18. [18] Automobile Inspection & Registration Information Association, “Car ownership chart (2019),” (in Japanese). [Accessed March 19, 2020]
  19. [19] Life Cycle Assessment Society of Japan, (in Japanese). [Accessed March 19, 2020]
  20. [20] S. Uchida, “A Comparison of Energy Efficiency Between Electric and Petrol Vehicles and the Influence of East-Japan Earthquake on Them,” J. of Japan Society of Energy and Resources, Vol.32, No.6, pp. 14-18, 2011.
  21. [21] Ministry of the Environment, “Result of Evaluation of Progress Situation of Global Warming Measure in Electricity Business Field,” (in Japanese). [Accessed March 19, 2020]
  22. [22] Statistics Bureau of Japan, “Census (2015 fiscal year),” (in Japanese). [Accessed March 19, 2020]
  23. [23] International Energy Agency (IEA), “Global EV Outlook 2019,” 2019.
  24. [24] T. Litman, “Evaluating Carsharing Benefits,” Transportation Research Record: J. of the Transportation Research Board, Vol.1702, No.1, pp. 31-35, 2000.
  25. [25] F. F. Dias, P. S. Lavieri et al., “A Behavioral Choice Model of the Use of Car-sharing and Ride-sourcing Services,” Transportation, Vol.44, No.6, pp. 1307-1323, 2017.
  26. [26] C. Celsor and A. Millard-Ball, “Where Does Carsharing Work?: Using Geographic Information Systems to Assess Market Potential,” Transportation Research Record: J. of the Transportation Research Board, Vol.1992, No.1, pp. 61-69, 2007.
  27. [27] T. Stillwater, P. L. Mokhtarian, and S. A. Shaheen, “Carsharing and the Built Environment: Geographic Information System-Based Study of One U.S. Operator,” Transportation Research Record: J. of the Transportation Research Board, Vol.2110, No.1, pp. 27-34, 2009.
  28. [28] T. Ercan, N. C. Onat et al., “Public Transportation Adoption Requires a Paradigm Shift in Urban Development Structure,” J. of Cleaner Production, Vol.142, pp. 1789-1799, 2017.
  29. [29] A. Millard-Ball, G. Murray et al., “Car-Sharing: Where and How it Succeeds,” Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP) Report 108, 2005.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Jul. 19, 2024