single-au.php

IJAT Vol.13 No.4 pp. 539-544
doi: 10.20965/ijat.2019.p0539
(2019)

Paper:

Determination of the Efficiency of the Operation Mode of Nonflowing Installation for Electroactivation of Water and Aqueous Solutions

Nikolay V. Ksenz*,†, Igor V. Yudaev**, Michael A. Taranov**, Ivan G. Sidorcov*, Alexander M. Semenikhin**, and Vasiliy A. Chernovolov***

*Department of Technosphere Safety and Physics, Azov-Black Sea Engineering Institute, Don State Agrarian University
21 Lenin Str., Zernograd, Rostov Oblast 347740, Russia

Corresponding author

**Department of Thermal Engineering and Information Management System, Azov-Black Sea Engineering Institute, Don State Agrarian University,
Zernograd, Russia

***Department of Operation of Power Equipment and Electrical Machines, Azov-Black Sea Engineering Institute, Don State Agrarian University,
Zernograd, Russia

Received:
October 24, 2018
Accepted:
May 5, 2019
Published:
July 5, 2019
Keywords:
electroactivated water, hydrogen indicator, separation membrane, membrane working area, interelectrode distance
Abstract

In the agricultural production and processing industry, technological processes in which electroactivated water and solutions based on it are effectively used are very widespread. The development of installations for the electroactivation of water and the optimization of operating modes are undoubtedly topical issues, the solution of which will make it possible to use them more effectively in agricultural practice. The results have been presented of studying the operational characteristics of a nonflowing device for the electroactivation of tap water both with an unchanged area of the separation membrane between the anode and cathode compartments and when this area changes its dimensions. Studies have made it possible to establish that, at a constant value of the working area of the separation membrane, the minimum consumption of electricity corresponds to the smallest interelectrode distance. Approaches for implementing effective operation of the electrotechnological installation are proposed.

Cite this article as:
N. Ksenz, I. Yudaev, M. Taranov, I. Sidorcov, A. Semenikhin, and V. Chernovolov, “Determination of the Efficiency of the Operation Mode of Nonflowing Installation for Electroactivation of Water and Aqueous Solutions,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.13, No.4, pp. 539-544, 2019.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] K. L. Golokhvast, D. S. Ryzhakov, and V. V. Chaika, “Prospects and use of electrochemical activation of solutions,” J. Water: Chemistry and Ecology, Vol.2, pp. 23-30, 2011.
  2. [2] B. I. Leonov, V. I. Prilutskii, and V. M. Bakhir, “Physico-chemical aspects of the biological action of electrochemically activated water,” All-Russian Research and Testing Institute of Medical Technology, 1999.
  3. [3] V. I. Prilutskii and V. M. Bakhir, “Electrochemically activated water: abnormal properties, mechanism of biological action,” All-Russian Research and Testing Institute of Medical Technology, 1997.
  4. [4] A. I. Byvaltsev, G. O. Magomedov, and V. A. Byvaltsev, “Properties of activated water and its use in food technology,” Storage and Processing of Agricultural Raw Materials, Vol.7, pp. 49-53, 2008.
  5. [5] N. V. Ksenz and P. B. Cheba, “The effectiveness of the use of electroactivated solutions in agricultural production technologies,” “Physical and Technical Problems of Creating New Technologies in the Agro-Industrial Complex,” Argus, pp. 74-81, 2011.
  6. [6] N. V. Ksenz, P. B. Cheba, and I. G. Sidortsov, “Electroactivated water in agricultural production technologies,”, Int. Scientific and Practical Conf. on Innovative Energy-Saving Technologies, Russia, November 8-9, 2012.
  7. [7] G. A. Plutahin, M. Aider, A. G. Koshchaev, and E. N. Gnatko, “Practical application of electrochemically activated aqueous solutions,” Polythematic Network Electronic Scientific J. of the Kuban State Agrarian University, Vol.92, pp. 254-264, 2013.
  8. [8] N. V. Ksenz and S. V. Kacheishvili, “Analysis of electrical and magnetic impacts on seeds,” The Mechanization and Electrification of Agriculture, Vol.5, pp. 10-12, 2000.
  9. [9] I. G. Sidortsov, A. I. Goncharov, and A. I. Govorun, “The influence of inhomogeneous magnetic fields when the presowing activation of seeds on their starting characteristics and plant development,” A. V. Efanov (Eds.), “Methods and Technical Means of Increasing the Efficiency of Use in Industry and Agriculture,” Argus, pp. 36-41, 2014.
  10. [10] N. V. Ksenz, E. A. Kiyashko, K. Kh. Popandopulo, and I. G. Sidortsov, “Analysis of factors affecting the energy intensity of the process of electrodialysis of water and its physical properties,” Vestnik Agrarnoy Nauki Dona, Vol.1, No.17, pp. 14-18, 2012.
  11. [11] N. V. Ksenz, E. A. Kiyashko, K. Kh. Popandopulo, and I. G. Sidortsov, “Energy and technological parameters of water electrodialysis,” P. P. Kazakevich and O. O. Dudarev (Eds.), “Nauchno-Tehnicheskii Progress V Selskom Hozyaystve,” Vol.3, Scientific and Practical Center for Agricultural Mechanization of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, pp. 83-86, 2012.
  12. [12] A. S. Sietkaziev, L. A. Kulkaeva, and G. B. Shinysherova, “Rationale for water soil washing technologies by growth regulation,” Periódico Tchê Química, Vol.15, No.30, pp. 578-589, 2018.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, IE9,10,11, Opera.

Last updated on Aug. 21, 2019