single-au.php

IJAT Vol.12 No.4 pp. 499-506
doi: 10.20965/ijat.2018.p0499
(2018)

Paper:

Collaboration Challenges in Digital Service Innovation Projects

Johan Simonsson and Mats Magnusson

Department of Machine Design, School of Industrial Engineering and Management, KTH Royal Institute of Technology
Brinellvägen 83, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden

Corresponding author

Received:
October 2, 2017
Accepted:
May 21, 2018
Online released:
July 3, 2018
Published:
July 5, 2018
Keywords:
service innovation, digitalization, business model innovation, collaboration
Abstract

Digitalization is frequently seen as an important source of service innovation, enabling new solutions where products and services are bundled into offerings. As the realization of such offerings frequently requires the inclusion of new technological components and implies changes to activities across the value chain, they often require collaboration with other companies. This article explores what challenges arise when different organizations collaborate in service innovation enabled by digitalization. This study investigates a joint project between three companies aiming to innovate, build, and verify a proof-of-concept for an automated return process at a European rental company in the construction industry. An explorative case study approach was selected, and data were collected through semi-structured interviews with key managers in the collaborating companies as well as through meetings and workshops during the innovation project. The empirical observations revealed four main challenges: (1) the formulation of shared and complementary innovation objectives, (2) the joint design of a new business model addressing both value creation and value appropriation, (3) the management of the collaborative project across organizational boundaries, and (4) the fruitful combining of multiple agile organizing approaches.

Cite this article as:
J. Simonsson and M. Magnusson, “Collaboration Challenges in Digital Service Innovation Projects,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.12, No.4, pp. 499-506, 2018.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] C. Hsu, “Scaling with digital connection: Services innovation,” Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, pp. 4057-4061, 2007.
  2. [2] G. C. Kane, D. Palmer, A. N. Phillips, D. Kiron, and N. Buckley, “Aligning the Organization for Its Digital Future,” MIT Sloan Manag. Rev., No.58180, pp. 1-29, 2016.
  3. [3] J. Bughin and N. Van Zeebroeck, “The Best Response to Digital Disruption,” MIT Sloan Manag. Rev., Vol.58, No.4, pp. 80-86, 2017.
  4. [4] M. E. Porter and J. E. Heppelmann, “How Smart, Connected Product Are Transforming Competition,” Harv. Bus. Rev., No.November, pp. 64-89, 2014.
  5. [5] M. Lindahl, E. Sundin, and T. Sakao, “Environmental and economic benefits of Integrated Product Service Offerings quantified with real business cases,” J. Clean. Prod., Vol.64, pp. 288-296, 2014.
  6. [6] S. Tongur and M. Engwall, “The business model dilemma of technology shifts,” Technovation, Vol.34, No.9, pp. 525-535, 2014.
  7. [7] C. Kowalkowski, L. Witell, and A. Gustafsson, “Any way goes: Identifying value constellations for service infusion in SMEs,” Ind. Mark. Manag., Vol.42, No.1, pp. 18-30, 2013.
  8. [8] V. Parida, D. R. Sjödin, J. Wincent, and M. Kohtamäki, “A survey study of the transitioning towards high-value industrial product-services,” Procedia CIRP, Vol.16, pp. 176-180, 2014.
  9. [9] O. F. Bustinza, E. Gomes, F. Vendrell-Herrero, and T. Baines, “Product-service innovation and performance: The role of collaborative partnerships and R&D intensity,” R and D Management, 2017.
  10. [10] A. P. B. Barquet, M. G. de Oliveira, C. R. Amigo, V. P. Cunha, and H. Rozenfeld, “Employing the business model concept to support the adoption of product-service systems (PSS),” Ind. Mark. Manag., Vol.42, No.5, pp. 693-704, 2013.
  11. [11] A. Tukker, “Product services for a resource-efficient and circular economy – A review,” J. of Cleaner Production, Vol.97. pp. 76-91, 2015.
  12. [12] M. Boehm and O. Thomas, “Looking beyond the rim of one’s teacup: A multidisciplinary literature review of Product-Service Systems in Information Systems, Business Management, and Engineering & Design,” J. of Cleaner Production, Vol.51, pp. 245-250, 2013.
  13. [13] M. E. Porter, “Competitive Advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance,” Vol.15, 1985.
  14. [14] P. Gaiardelli, V. Martinez, and S. Cavalieri, “The strategic transition to services: A dominant logic perspective and its implications for operations,” Production Planning and Control, Vol.26, Nos.14-15, pp. 1165-1170, 2015.
  15. [15] V. Martinez, M. Bastl, J. Kingston, and S. Evans, “Challenges in transforming manufacturing organisations into product – service providers,” J. Manuf. Technol. Manag., Vol.21, No.4, pp. 449-469, 2010.
  16. [16] H. Chesbrough, “Business model innovation: Opportunities and barriers,” Long Range Plann., Vol.43, Nos.2-3, pp. 354-363, 2010.
  17. [17] C. C. Markides, “Business Model Innovation: What Can the Ambidexterity Literature Teach US?,” Acad. Manag. Perspect., Vol.27, No.4, pp. 313-323, 2013.
  18. [18] S. Wiesner, E. Marilungo, and K.-D. Thoben, “Cyber-physical product-service systems – challenges for requirements engineering,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.11, No.1, pp. 17-28, 2017.
  19. [19] B. G. Auguste, E. P. Harmon, and V. Pandit, “The right service strategies for product companies,” McKinsey Q., Vol.1, No.1, pp. 41-51, 2006.
  20. [20] “Digitalization – Gartner IT Glossary” http://www.gartner.com/it-glossary/digitalization [Accessed October 1, 2017]
  21. [21] I. Lee and K. Lee, “The Internet of Things (IoT): Applications, investments, and challenges for enterprises,” Bus. Horiz., Vol.58, No.4, pp. 431-440, 2015.
  22. [22] A. Gawer and M. A. Cusumano, “Industry platforms and ecosystem innovation,” J. Prod. Innov. Manag., Vol.31, No.3, pp. 417-433, 2014.
  23. [23] D. Nobelius, “Towards the sixth generation of R&D management,” Int. J. Proj. Manag., Vol.22, No.5, pp. 369-375, 2004.
  24. [24] M. V. Tatikonda and S. R. Rosenthal, “Successful execution of product development projects: Balancing firmness and flexibility in the innovation process,” J. Oper. Manag., Vol.18, No.4, pp. 401-425, 2000.
  25. [25] R. Atkinson, L. Crawford, and S. Ward, “Fundamental uncertainties in projects and the scope of project management,” Int. J. Proj. Manag., Vol.24, No.8, pp. 687-698, 2006.
  26. [26] P. R. de Almeida, M. Bühler, P. Gerbert, S. Castagnino, and C. Rothballer (Eds.), “Shaping the Future of Construction: A Breakthrough in Mindset and Technology,” World Economic Forum, 2016.
  27. [27] R. K. Yin, “Enhancing the quality of case studies in health services research,” Health Serv. Res., Vol.34, No.5 Pt 2, pp. 1209-1224, 1999.
  28. [28] A. Dubois and L.-E. Gadde, “Case studies in business market research: An abductive approach,” Proc. 15th Annu. IMP Conf., pp. 1-20, 1999.
  29. [29] P. Coughlan and D. Coghlan, “Action research for operations management,” Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag., Vol.22, No.2, pp. 220-240, 2002.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, IE9,10,11, Opera.

Last updated on Dec. 11, 2018