IJAT Vol.9 No.6 pp. 731-738
doi: 10.20965/ijat.2015.p0731


Identifying the Benefits of Fiber Reinforced Plastics for Their Use in Machine Tool Structures

Conrad W. P. Fischbach, Michael F. Zaeh, and Martin Mair

Institute for Machine Tools and Industrial Management (iwb), Technische Universitaet
Muenchen, Boltzmannstrasse 15, Garching 85748, Germany

July 9, 2015
October 5, 2015
November 5, 2015
FRP components, material substitution, technological performance, economic assessment, machine tool, flexible multi body analysis

Machine tool structures are usually caught in the dichotomies of mass, static rigidity, working area, and dynamic rigidity. This dichotomies are mainly dependent on the mass specific stiffness of the structure material. Fiber reinforced plastics can offer a significantly higher mass specific stiffness than steel can and are therefore able to mollify this dichotomies for machine tool structures. The challenge the machine tool industry faces, though, is the high price of those suitable fiber reinforced plastics, such as carbon fiber reinforced plastics. The price is significantly higher compared to steel components, and it is not clear in which cases or to what extent the simplified equation can generate overall financial benefits. This paper proposes a systematic approach to analyzing criteria and deciding when fiber reinforced plastics can generate added value. Then, a value creation model is derived from the technological performance enhancement that mollified dichotomies can achieve. A simplified example shows how the specific value created by material substitution in a machine component can be extracted using a flexible, multi body method of analysis.

Cite this article as:
Conrad W. P. Fischbach, Michael F. Zaeh, and Martin Mair, “Identifying the Benefits of Fiber Reinforced Plastics for Their Use in Machine Tool Structures,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.9, No.6, pp. 731-738, 2015.
Data files:
  1. [1]  B. Haugk, “Beitrag zur Bewertung des Einsatzes von Faser-Verbund-Kunststoffen im Werkzeugmaschinenbau,” Dissertation Technische Universitaet Muenchen 2014.
  2. [2]  D. G. Lee, J. D. Suh, H. S. Kim, and J. M. Kim, “Design and manufacture of composite high speed machine tool structures,” Composite Science and Technology, Vol.64, pp. 1523-1530, 2004.
  3. [3]  A. Merlo, D. Ricciardi, F. Aggogeri, F. Meo, and L. Le Lay, “Application of composite materials for lightweight and smart structures design of high performance milling machines,” Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Composite Materials, Stockholm, Sweden, 2008.
  4. [4]  H. Shinno, H. Yoshioka, and H. Sawano, “A framework for systematizing machine tool engineering,” International Journal of Automation Technology Vol.7, No.6, p. 765, 2013.
  5. [5]  G. Schuh, F. Klocke, C. Brecher, and R. Schmitt, “Excellence in production,” Apprimus Aachen, pp. 31-51, 2007.
  6. [6]  M. Zaeh and D. Siedl, “A New Method for Simulation of Machining Performance by Integrat-ing Finite Element and Multi-body Simulation for Machine Tools,” Annals of the CIRP, Vol.56, No.1, pp. 383-386, 2007.
  7. [7]  D. Kono, S. Weikert, A. Matsubara, and K. Yamazaki, “Estimation of dynamic mechanical error for evaluation of machine tool structures,” International Journal of Automation Technology, Vol.6, No.2, 2012.
  8. [8]  H. Narita, “A method for using a virtual machining simulation to consider both equivalent CO2 emissions and machining costs in determining cutting conditions,” International Journal of Automation Technology, Vol.9, No.2, pp. 115-121, 2015.
  9. [9]  R. Foster, “Innovation,” Gabler Wiesbaden, p. 28, 1986.
  10. [10]  J. Milberg, “Werkzeugmaschinen,” Springer, Berlin, p. 19, 1992.
  11. [11]  J. Holtmannspöotter, F. Feucht, J. Meyer, J. de Freese, J. von Czarnecki, and T. Hofmann, “Rapid, reliable and reproducible,” Adhesion Adhesives & Sealants, Vol.11, No.1, pp. 12-16, 2014.
  12. [12]  R. Neugebauer, M. Wabner, S. Ihlenfeldt, U. Friess, F. Schneider, and F. Schubert, “Bionics Based Energy Efficient Machine Tool Design,” 45th CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems, Procedia CIRP, No.3, pp. 561-566, 2012.
  13. [13]  L. Kroll, P. Blau, M. Wabner, U. Friess, J. Eulitz, and M. Kl”arner, “Lightweight components for energy-efficient machine tools,” CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, No.4, pp. 148-160, 2011.
  14. [14]  P. Kerstiens, “Strukturelemente füur Produktionsmachinen aus carbonfaserverst”arkten Kunststoffen,” Dissertation RWTH Aachen, 1990.
  15. [15]  M. Neitzel and P. Mitschang, “Handbuch Verbundwerkstoffe,” Carl Hanser Muenchen Wien, p. 26, 2004.
  16. [16]  V. Lasova, J. Vacik, and R. Kottner, “Investigation of Dynamic Properties of Hybrid Laminate Structure,” Procedia Engineering, Vol.48, pp. 358-366, 2012.
  17. [17]  A. Bretz, A. Landmann, and R. Rost, “Integration of carbon fibre reinforced structures in machine tools using the example of a swivel arm,” Advanced Materials Research, Vol.1018, pp. 387-394, 2014.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Mar. 05, 2021