single-au.php

IJAT Vol.8 No.2 pp. 147-158
doi: 10.20965/ijat.2014.p0147
(2014)

Paper:

Views over last 60 days: 780

Motion Analysis of McKibben Type Pneumatic Rubber Artificial Muscle with Finite Element Method

Takashi Nozaki* and Toshiro Noritsugu**

*Shizuoka Institute of Science and Technology, 2200-2 Toyosawa, Fukuroi, Shizuoka 437-8555, Japan

**Tsuyama National College of Technology, 624-1 Numa, Tsuyama-City, Okayama 708-8509, Japan

Received:
October 14, 2013
Accepted:
January 20, 2014
Published:
March 5, 2014
Creative Commons License
Keywords:
McKibben type pneumatic rubber artificial muscle, artificial muscle, finite element method, solid model, soft actuator
Abstract

This study aims to use three-dimensional (3D) Finite Element Modeling (FEM) to establish a quantitative design optimization method forMcKibben-type pneumatic rubber artificial muscle. First, a simple 3D model that does not account for the friction between the tube and the fiber braid strands and or that between the strands themselves is developed. The model is validated through experimentation, and the usefulness of the model is examined. With this model, the effects of various parameters, e.g., the braid angle, on the operation of the artificial muscle is investigated. It is found that the characteristics of the artificial muscle can be predicted. Thus, the proposed analysis may be a useful design method for braided artificial muscles.

Cite this article as:
Takashi Nozaki and Toshiro Noritsugu, “Motion Analysis of McKibben Type Pneumatic Rubber Artificial Muscle with Finite Element Method,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.8, No.2, pp. 147-158, 2014.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] T. Noritsugu, “Robot Engineering and Soft Material,” J. of the Society of Rubber Science and Technology, Japan, Vol.78, No.8, pp. 295-300, 2005.
  2. [2] T. Noritsugu, “Introduction for Symposium on Human Support Type Robot,” The Lecture Outline of Symp. on Human Support Type Robot, Okayama, Sep. 16, 2008.
  3. [3] T. Noritsugu, “Major machine element selection guide, Pneumatic actuator,” Machine Design, Vol.49, No.6, pp. 68-71, 2005.
  4. [4] T. Noritsugu, “Therecent Research Trend of Pneumatic Device and System,” Machine Design, Vol.43, No.2, pp. 2-5, 1999.
  5. [5] T. Noritsugu, “The Front Line of Development of SoftActuator, Structure and Application of Air Pressure TypeSoft Actuator,” pp. 291-292.
  6. [6] “Manual for the Rubber Industry,” the fourth Ed., the Society of Rubber Science and Technology, pp. 9-50.
  7. [7] S. Miyata, T. Tsujii, T. Hashimoto, and H. Kobayashi, “Development of Pneumatic Artificial MuscleManipulator with Feedforward and Feedback Control,” Trans. of JSME, Series C, Vol.74, No.748, pp. 3004-3011, Dec. 2008.
  8. [8] T. Otani, T. Noritsugu, M. Takaiwa, and D. Sasaki, “Development of Muscle String and its Application to Active Supporter,” Trans. of JSME, No.055-1, Mar. 2005.
  9. [9] T. Noritsugu, “Application to Robot Control of Rubber Artificial Muscle,” J. of the Robotics Society of Japan, Vol.9, pp. 502-506, 1991.
  10. [10] S. Wakimoto, K. Suzumori, and T. Kanda, “Development of Intelligent McKibben Actuator,” Trans. of JSME, Series C, Vol.71, No.709, pp. 2754-2760, Sep. 2005.
  11. [11] T. Akagi and S. Dohta, “Development of McKibben Artificial Muscle with a Long Stroke Motion,” Trans. of JSME, Series C, Vol.73, No.735, pp. 2996-3002, Nov. 2007.

Creative Commons License  This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Oct. 20, 2021