single-au.php

IJAT Vol.6 No.1 pp. 22-28
doi: 10.20965/ijat.2012.p0022
(2012)

Paper:

Development of Rail Trajectory Measurement Device for Inspection of Crane Rail

Takuya Hashimoto*, Tomoyoshi Ono**, Noriko Kamiya**,
and Hiroshi Kobayashi*

*Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tokyo University of Science, 1-14-6 Kudankita, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 102-0073, Japan

**Koishi Corporation, 2-15-6 Akenokita, Oita-shi, Oita 870-0165, Japan

Received:
August 4, 2011
Accepted:
December 20, 2011
Published:
January 5, 2012
Keywords:
inspection device, rail-trajectory measurement, overhead crane, laser range sensor, image processing
Abstract

In factories, an overhead crane is ordinarily used to convey heavy loads amounting to dozens of tons. However, the rails of the overhead crane face the risk of being deformed and cracking under heavy loads, and they are a cause of serious accidents. In this paper, a new inspection device is proposed to prevent such serious accidents; the device is called Trajectory Measurement Device (TMD) which can measure the trajectories of crane rail automatically; so far, workers have measured trajectories manually. In the proposed system, the TMD runs along the trajectory path of a crane-rail from one end, and the laser beam of a laser range sensor irradiates the target plate fixed on the TMD from the other end. Then, images of the target plate are captured with a camera, and the rail trajectory can be estimated by tracing the laser point on the target plate via image processing. In a field experiment, the TMD is actually used to measure the trajectory path of a crane rail in a factory, and its measurement accuracy and effectiveness are evaluated.

Cite this article as:
T. Hashimoto, T. Ono, N. Kamiya, and <. Kobayashi, “Development of Rail Trajectory Measurement Device for Inspection of Crane Rail,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.6, No.1, pp. 22-28, 2012.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] S. Hirose, H. Ohno, T. Mitsui, and K. Suyama, “Design of in-pipe inspection vehicles for φ25, φ50, φ150 pipes,” Proc. of 1999 IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pp. 2309-2314, 1999.
  2. [2] K. Suzumori, T. Miyagawa, M. Kimura, and Y. Hasegawa, “Micro inspection robot for 1-in pipes,” IEEE/ASME Trans. on Mechatronics, Vol.4 , No.3, pp. 286-292, 1999.
  3. [3] J. Oh, A. Lee, S. Oh, Y. Choi, B. Yi, and H. Yang, “Design and Control of Bridge Inspection Robot System,” Proc. of the 2007 IEEE Int. conf. on Mechatronics and Automation, pp. 3634-3639, 2007.
  4. [4] J. Luo, S. Xie, and Z. Gong, “Cable Maintenance Robot and its Dynamic Response Moving on the Horizontal Cable,” Proc. of 2009 Int. Conf. on Advanced Robotics, pp. 514-517, 2009.
  5. [5] P. Debenest, M. Guarnieri, K. Takita, F. Fukushima, and S. Hirose, “Sensor-Arm – Robotic Manipulator for Preventive Maintenance and Inspection of High-Voltage Transmission Lines,” Proc. of 2008 IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 1737-1744, 2008.
  6. [6] Nippon Steel Corporation, “RAILS,”
    http://www.nsc.co.jp/en/product/construction/pdf /EXE201.pdf
    [Accessed: Aug. 8, 2011]
  7. [7] F. Tache, W. Fischer, R. Siegwart, R. Moser, and F. Mondada, “Compact Magnetic Wheeled Robot with High Mobility for Inspecting Complex Shaped Pipes Structures,” Proc. of 2007 IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 261-266, 2007.
  8. [8] T. Yukawa, M. Suzuki, Y. Satoh, and H. Okano, “Design of Magnetic Wheels in Pip e Inspection Robot,” Proc. of 2006 IEEE Int. Conf. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, pp. 235-240, 2006.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, IE9,10,11, Opera.

Last updated on Nov. 08, 2019