single-rb.php

JRM Vol.38 No.5 pp. 1393-1401
(2026)

Paper:

Design and Fabrication of a Snake Robot Using Modular Pneumatic Film Actuators

Kaisei Takahashi*, Daisuke Yamaguchi** ORCID Icon, Shuichi Wakimoto** ORCID Icon, and Takefumi Kanda** ORCID Icon

*Graduate School of Environment, Life, Natural Science and Technology, School of Engineering, Okayama University
3-1-1 Tsushima-naka, Kita-ku, Okayama, Okayama 700-8530, Japan

**Division of Intelligent Mechanical Systems Course, Faculty of Environmental, Life, Natural Science and Technology, Okayama University
3-1-1 Tsushima-naka, Kita-ku, Okayama, Okayama 700-8530, Japan

Received:
March 27, 2026
Accepted:
June 27, 2026
Published:
October 20, 2026
Keywords:
soft robot, snake robot, pneumatic film actuator, polyimide
Abstract

Pipe inspection robots are being developed for environments that are difficult for humans to enter, such as nuclear power and chemical plants. However, the actuators used for robots are large and heavy, which limits the miniaturization of piping inspection robots. This paper presents an ultra-thin, lightweight film snake-type robot composed of polyimide (PI) film actuators. The proposed robot is expected to enable the easy transport of multiple units. By utilizing the heat and chemical resistance of PI, it can efficiently inspect various targets from multiple locations under harsh conditions. The robot employs a bidirectional bending differential stiffness actuator (BB-DSA). The BB-DSA has two air chambers formed by welding three non-stretchable PI films of different thicknesses. By changing the applied pneumatic pressure between the two air chambers, the actuator achieves bidirectional large bending deformation with a simple structure. A connectable actuator structure is also introduced to reduce the number of pneumatic supply tubes. This contributes to lowering the overall weight of the robot and improving its locomotion performance. The bending angle and generated force of the actuator were evaluated. In addition, a snake-type robot with a reduced number of tubes was fabricated, and its traveling speed and traction force were evaluated. The results show that the maximum traveling speed and traction force were 1.38 mm/s and 14.57 mN, respectively.

Snake-shaped robot made of PI films

Snake-shaped robot made of PI films

Cite this article as:
K. Takahashi, D. Yamaguchi, S. Wakimoto, and T. Kanda, “Design and Fabrication of a Snake Robot Using Modular Pneumatic Film Actuators,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.38 No.5, pp. 1393-1401, 2026.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] H. Jang et al., “A review: Technological trends and development direction of pipeline robot systems,” J. Intell. Robot. Syst., Vol.105, No.3, Article No.59, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-022-01669-2
  2. [2] M. R. A. Md Zin, K. S. M. Sahari, J. Md Saad, A. Anuar, and A. T. Zulkarnain, “Development of a low cost small sized in-pipe robot,” Procedia Eng., Vol.41, pp. 1469-1475, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.337
  3. [3] A. A. Abd Eltwab and A. Sameh, “A modular, multi-sensor crawler robot for adaptive pipeline inspection: Design and experimental validation,” Sci. Rep., Vol.16, Article No.880, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-32719-y
  4. [4] A. Gunatilake, L. Piyathilaka, S. Kodagoda, S. Barclay, and D. Vitanage, “Real-time 3D profiling with RGB-D mapping in pipelines using stereo camera vision and structured IR laser ring,” 14th IEEE Conf. Ind. Electron. Appl., pp. 916-921, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIEA.2019.8834089
  5. [5] R. S. Elankavi, D. Dinakaran, R. M. K. Chetty, M. M. Ramya, and D. G. H. Samuel, “A review on wheeled type in-pipe inspection robot,” Int. J. Mech. Eng. Robot. Res., Vol.11, No.10, pp. 745-754, 2022. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijmerr.11.10.745-754
  6. [6] J. Park, D. Hyun, W.-H. Cho, T.-H. Kim, and H.-S. Yang, “Normal-force control for an in-pipe robot according to the inclination of pipelines,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., Vol.58, No.12, pp. 5304-5310, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2010.2095392
  7. [7] L. Xu, L. Zhang, J. Zhao, and K. Kim, “Cornering algorithm for a crawler in-pipe inspection robot,” Symmetry, Vol.12, No.12, Article No.2016, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12122016
  8. [8] J. Park and H. Yang, “Pipeline mapping with crawler-type in-pipe robot feature,” J. Mech. Sci. Technol., Vol.37, No.10, pp. 5015-5020, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-023-0908-5
  9. [9] T. Ren, Q. Liu, Y. Li, and Y. Chen, “Design, analysis and innovation in variable radius active screw in-pipe drive mechanisms,” Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst., Vol.14, No.3, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1177/1729881417703564
  10. [10] T. Li et al., “Development of an in-pipe robot with differential screw angles for curved pipes and vertical straight pipes,” J. Mech. Robot., Vol.9, No.5, Article No.051014, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4037617
  11. [11] P. Li, S. Ma, C. Lyu, X. Jiang, and Y. Liu, “Energy-efficient control of a screw-drive pipe robot with consideration of actuator’s characteristics,” Robot. Biomim., Vol.3, Article No.11, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40638-016-0045-z
  12. [12] J. Qiao, J. Shang, and A. Goldenberg, “Development of inchworm in-pipe robot based on self-locking mechanism,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron., Vol.18, No.2, pp. 799-806, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2012.2184294
  13. [13] Q. Xie, S. Liu, and X. Ma, “Design of a novel inchworm in-pipe robot based on cam-linkage mechanism,” Adv. Mech. Eng., Vol.13, No.9, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1177/16878140211045193
  14. [14] J. Lim et al., “One pneumatic line based inchworm-like micro robot for half-inch pipe inspection,” Mechatronics, Vol.18, No.7, pp. 315-322, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechatronics.2008.05.007
  15. [15] S. Wakimoto, J. Nakajima, M. Tanaka, T. Kanda, and K. Suzumori, “A micro snake-like robot for small pipe inspection,” Proc. 2003 Int. Symp. Micromechatronics Hum. Sci., pp. 303-308, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1109/MHS.2003.1249959
  16. [16] F. Trebuňa, I. Virgala, M. Pástor, T. Lipták, and Ľ. Miková, “An inspection of pipe by snake robot,” Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst., Vol.13, No.5, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1177/1729881416663668
  17. [17] C.-W. Huang, C.-H. Huang, Y.-H. Hung, and C.-Y. Chang, “Sensing pipes of a nuclear power mechanism using low-cost snake robot,” Adv. Mech. Eng., Vol.10, No.6, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814018781286
  18. [18] I. Virgala et al., “Investigation of snake robot locomotion possibilities in a pipe,” Symmetry, Vol.12, No.6, Article No.939, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12060939
  19. [19] S. A. Fjerdingen, P. Liljebäck, and A. A. Transeth, “A snake-like robot for internal inspection of complex pipe structures (PIKo),” 2009 IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intell. Robots Syst., pp. 5665-5671, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2009.5354751
  20. [20] Y. Miyake, D. Yamaguchi, S. Wakimoto, and T. Kanda, “Fabrication of bidirectionally bending rigid differential actuator using polyimide films,” Proc. JFPS Fluid Power Syst. Conf., 2023 (in Japanese).
  21. [21] D. Yamaguchi et al., “Concept and prototype of soft actuator for liquid nitrogen temperature environments,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.32, No.5, pp. 1019-1026, 2020. https://doi.org/10.20965/jrm.2020.p1019
  22. [22] S. Wakimoto, K. Suzumori, M. Tanaka, and J. Nakajima, “In-pipe inspection micro robot adaptable to changes in pipe diameter,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.15, No.6, pp. 609-615, 2003. https://doi.org/10.20965/jrm.2003.p0609
  23. [23] S. Wakimoto, K. Suzumori, and T. Kanda, “A bio-mimetic amphibious soft cord robot,” Trans. Jpn. Soc. Mech. Eng. C, Vol.72, No.714, pp. 471-477, 2006 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.1299/kikaic.72.471

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Oct. 19, 2026