single-rb.php

JRM Vol.37 No.6 pp. 1534-1544
doi: 10.20965/jrm.2025.p1534
(2025)

Paper:

Comparative Study of In-Phase and Anti-Phase Arm Swingings in Rimless Wheel Locomotion

Cong Yan* ORCID Icon, Yanqiu Zheng** ORCID Icon, Fumihiko Asano*** ORCID Icon, and Isao Tokuda* ORCID Icon

*Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ritsumeikan University
1-1-1 Nojihigashi, Kusatsu, Shiga 525-8577, Japan

**Department of Applied Electronics, Faculty of Advanced Engineering, Tokyo University of Science
6-3-1 Niijuku, Katsushika-ku, Tokyo 125-8585, Japan

***Graduate School of Advanced Science and Technology, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
1-1 Asahidai, Nomi, Ishikawa 923-1292, Japan

Received:
April 25, 2025
Accepted:
August 19, 2025
Published:
December 20, 2025
Keywords:
passive walking robot, rimless wheel, arm swing, frequency entrainment, biomimetic locomotion
Abstract

This paper investigated the dynamics and control of an underactuated rimless wheel (RW) with semicircular feet driven by two pendulum-like arms. We focused on the entrainment property of the RW walking to the periodic oscillations of the arms and analyzed how different arm coordination patterns, i.e., in-phase and anti-phase swingings, affect the walking stability and performance of the system. A mathematical model was developed that captured the continuous dynamics, collision events, and control method for this hybrid mechanical system. Numerical simulations demonstrated that the anti-phase arm swinging, similar to human walking, provided superior performance compared to the in-phase swinging. Specifically, the anti-phase coordination yielded a wider range of entrainment, as well as a wider range of stable walking, across various control parameters including the forcing frequency and the arm weight. Through rigorous Poincaré map stability analysis, we further quantified the system’s robustness to perturbations, revealing that anti-phase arm swinging maintains stability even with increased arm mass, while in-phase swinging becomes unstable. The stable walking of the anti-phase coordination was supported by the opposing movements of the left and right arms, which effectively counterbalance the forward and backward momentums to suppress the ground reaction forces. These results may provide design principles for controlling underactuated walking robots with arms.

Anti-phase vs in-phase arm swingings

Anti-phase vs in-phase arm swingings

Cite this article as:
C. Yan, Y. Zheng, F. Asano, and I. Tokuda, “Comparative Study of In-Phase and Anti-Phase Arm Swingings in Rimless Wheel Locomotion,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.37 No.6, pp. 1534-1544, 2025.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] T. McGeer et al., “Passive dynamic walking,” Int. J. Robotics Res., Vol.9, No.2, pp. 62-82, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1177/027836499000900206
  2. [2] T. McGeer, “Dynamics and control of bipedal locomotion,” J. of Theoretical Biology, Vol.163, No.3, pp. 277-314, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.1993.1121
  3. [3] S. Collins, A. Ruina, R. Tedrake, and M. Wisse, “Efficient bipedal robots based on passive-dynamic walkers,” Science, Vol.307, No.5712, pp. 1082-1085, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1107799
  4. [4] S. H. Collins and A. Ruina, “A bipedal walking robot with efficient and human-like gait,” Proc. of the 2005 IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pp. 1983-1988, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.2005.1570404
  5. [5] M. J. Coleman, A. Chatterjee, and A. Ruina, “Motions of a rimless spoked wheel: A simple three-dimensional system with impacts,” Dynamics and Stability of Systems, Vol.12, No.3, pp. 139-159, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681119708806242
  6. [6] F. Asano and Z.-W. Luo, “Asymptotically stable biped gait generation based on stability principle of rimless wheel,” Robotica, Vol.27, No.6, pp. 949-958, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0263574709005372
  7. [7] F. Asano, Y. Zheng, and X. Xiao, “Time-scale control approaches to collisionless walking of an underactuated rimless wheel,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.29, No.3, pp. 471-479, 2017. https://doi.org/10.20965/jrm.2017.p0471
  8. [8] Y. Kuramoto, “Chemical oscillations, waves, and turbulence,” Springer, 1984. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69689-3
  9. [9] A. Pikovsky, M. Rosenblum, and J. Kurths, “Synchronization: A universal concept in nonlinear sciences,” Cambridge University Press, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755743
  10. [10] S. Strogatz, “Synchronization: A universal concept in nonlinear sciences,” Physics Today, Vol.56, No.1, p. 47, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1554136
  11. [11] J. Ahn and N. Hogan, “Walking is not like reaching: evidence from periodic mechanical perturbations,” PloS one, Vol.7, No.3, Article No.e31767, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031767
  12. [12] F. Asano and I. Tokuda, “Indirectly controlled limit cycle walking of combined rimless wheel based on entrainment to active wobbling motion,” Multibody System Dynamics, Vol.34, pp. 191-210, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-014-9419-6
  13. [13] Y. Hanazawa, T. Hayashi, M. Yamakita, and F. Asano, “High-speed limit cycle walking for biped robots using active up-and-down motion control of wobbling mass,” 2013 IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 3649-3654, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2013.6696877
  14. [14] Y. Hanazawa and F. Asano, “High-speed biped walking using swinging-arms based on principle of up-and-down wobbling mass,” 2015 IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 5191-5196, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2015.7139922
  15. [15] H. Pontzer, J. H. Holloway 4th, D. A. Raichlen, and D. E. Lieberman, “Control and function of arm swing in human walking and running,” J. of Experimental Biology, Vol.212, No.4, pp. 523-534, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.024927
  16. [16] S. H. Collins, P. G. Adamczyk, and A. D. Kuo, “Dynamic arm swinging in human walking,” Proc. of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Vol.276, No.1673, pp. 3679-3688, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.0664
  17. [17] S. M. Bruijn, O. G. Meijer, P. J. Beek, and J. H. Van Dieen, “The effects of arm swing on human gait stability,” J. of Experimental Biology, Vol.213, No.23, pp. 3945-3952, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.045112
  18. [18] J. Park, “Synthesis of natural arm swing motion in human bipedal walking,” J. of Biomechanics, Vol.41, No.7, pp. 1417-1426, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.02.031
  19. [19] A. Goswami, B. Thuilot, and B. Espiau, “Compass-like biped robot part i: Stability and bifurcation of passive gaits,” Ph.D. dissertation, INRIA, 1996.
  20. [20] C. Yan, L. Li, W. Yanagimoto, Z. Feng, and I. Tokuda, “Modeling and optimization of an arc-shaped sliding locomotion robot with wobbling mass,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.35, No.4, pp. 1063-1072, 2023. https://doi.org/10.20965/jrm.2023.p1063

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Dec. 19, 2025