Force sensors require different measurement ranges and sensitivities depending on the operating environment. Therefore, we developed a force sensor with both variable sensitivity and measurement range based on structural modification induced by simple bending. In our previous study, we changed the distance between the force application point and the detection area. However, it was necessary to change the position and direction of the measured force. Therefore, in the present study, we changed the cross-sectional shape of the sensor. First, we introduce the theoretical basis for the proposed force sensor. We then describe prototype sensors and the experimental methods used to determine their performance. We fabricated the prototypes by attaching a strain gauge to one side of shape-memory polymer plates, which can be deformed at temperatures above the glass transition temperature (T_g) by applying a small load and maintain their rigid shape after they have been cooled below T_g. We designed two types of sensor with different cross-sectional shapes (i.e., hollow cylinder and channel beam) and experimentally evaluated them. The results indicated that the sensitivity and measurement range of the sensor can be changed by modifying the cross-sectional shape. For example, for hollow cylinder and channel beam types of sensor, the maximum change in sensitivity before and after bending was 6.2 and 2.7 times, respectively. Although these values were smaller than that (12 times) obtained in our previous study, it was possible to change the sensitivity without changing the position or direction of the measured force.

1. [1] K. Suzumori and H. Nabae, “Review of flexible/stretchable sensors for soft robot,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.37, No.1, pp. 8-12, 2025. https://doi.org/10.20965/jrm.2025.p0008
2. [2] W. Jiang, Z. Luo, W. Wang, J. Liu, and L. Zhang, “Dynamic sensitivity evaluation for force transducers by using a gray-bootstrap method,” IEEE Sens. J., Vol.23, No.23, pp. 29019-29028, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2023.3323783
3. [3] F. J. Abu-Dakka and M. Saveriano, “Variable impedance control and learning—A review,” Front. Robot. AI, Vol.7, Article No.590681, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2020.590681
4. [4] J. Fraden, “Handbook of Modern Sensors: Physics, Designs, and Applications,” 3rd Edition, Springer, 2003.
5. [5] Y. Murozaki, S. Sakuma, and F. Arai, “Improvement of the measurement range and temperature characteristics of a load sensor using a quartz crystal resonator with all crystal layer components,” Sensors, Vol.17, No.5, Article No.1067, 2017. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17051067
6. [6] J. Jiang, W. Chen, J. Liu, W. Chen, and J. Zhang, “Optimum design of a dual-range force sensor for achieving high sensitivity, broad bandwidth, and large measurement range,” IEEE Sens. J., Vol.15, No.2, pp. 1114-1123, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2014.2360885
7. [7] D. Okumura, S. Sakaino, and T. Tsuji, “High dynamic range sensing by a multistage six-axis force sensor with stopper mechanism,” 2018 IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom., pp. 4065-4070, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2018.8460571
8. [8] R. Tamura, S. Sakaino, and T. Tsuji, “Development of compact high dynamic range six-axis force sensor with cross-arch structure,” 45th Annu. Conf. IEEE Ind. Electron. Soc., pp. 3609-3614, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/IECON.2019.8926830
9. [9] T. Kawahara and T. Tsuji, “Development of high dynamic range six-axis force sensor with simple structure,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.35, No.3, pp. 771-779, 2023. https://doi.org/10.20965/jrm.2023.p0771
10. [10] R. Tamura, S. Sakaino, and T. Tsuji, “High dynamic range uniaxial force/torque sensor using metal foil and semiconductor strain gauge,” IEEJ J. Ind. Appl., Vol.10, No.5, pp. 506-511, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1541/IEEJJIA.20007411
11. [11] S. Zhuo, C. Song, Q. Rong, T. Zhao, and M. Liu, “Shape and stiffness memory ionogels with programmable pressure-resistance response,” Nat. Commun., Vol.13, Article No.1743, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-29424-z
12. [12] W. Yue et al., “Origami-inspired structure with pneumatic-induced variable stiffness for multi-DOF force-sensing,” Sensors, Vol.22, No.14, Article No.5370, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/S22145370
13. [13] X. Sun, W. Chen, X. Xiong, W. Chen, and Y. Jin, “A variable configuration force sensor with adjustable resolution for robotic applications,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., Vol.70, No.2, pp. 2066-2075, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2022.3163538
14. [14] A. Faragasso et al., “Novel uniaxial force sensor based on visual information for minimally invasive surgery,” 2014 IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom., pp. 1405-1410, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2014.6907036
15. [15] C. Hou et al., “A highly integrated 3D MEMS force sensing module with variable sensitivity for robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery,” Adv. Funct. Mater., Vol.33, No.43, Article No.2302812, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1002/ADFM.202302812
16. [16] M. Maroufi, H. Alemansour, M. B. Coskun, and S. O. R. Moheimani, “An adjustable-stiffness MEMS force sensor: Design, characterization, and control,” Mechatronics, Vol.56, pp. 198-210, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MECHATRONICS.2018.05.007
17. [17] A. Nastro, M. Ferrari, and V. Ferrari, “Double-actuator position-feedback mechanism for adjustable sensitivity in electrostatic-capacitive MEMS force sensors,” Sens. Actuators A: Phys., Vol.312, Article No.112127, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SNA.2020.112127
18. [18] R. Horie and M. Kaneko, “A sensitivity variable tactile sensor with self-tuner,” J. Robot. Soc. Jpn., Vol.21, No.8, pp. 940-946, 2003 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.7210/JRSJ.21.940
19. [19] S. Kouno, “A sensitivity variable tactile sensor with self-tuner,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.18, No.1, pp. 83-88, 2006. https://doi.org/10.20965/JRM.2006.P0083
20. [20] K. Takashima, H. Kamizono, M. Takenaka, and T. Mukai, “Force sensor utilizing stiffness change of shape-memory polymer based on temperature,” ROBOMECH J., Vol.4, Article No.17, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40648-017-0086-2
21. [21] K. Takashima, J. Kobuchi, N. Kamamichi, K. Takagi, and T. Mukai, “Characterization of variable-sensitivity force sensor using stiffness change of shape-memory polymer based on temperature,” ROBOMECH J., Vol.8, Article No.24, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40648-021-00210-8
22. [22] K. Takashima, K. Ota, and H. Cho, “Variable-sensitivity force sensor based on structural modification,” Sensors, Vol.23, No.4, Article No.2077, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23042077
23. [23] J. M. Jani, M. Leary, A. Subic, and M. A. Gibson, “A review of shape memory alloy research, applications and opportunities,” Mater. Des., Vol.56, pp. 1078-1113, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.11.084
24. [24] K. Takashima et al., “Development and application of shape-memory polymer and alloy composite sheets,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.36, No.3, pp. 769-778, 2024. https://doi.org/10.20965/jrm.2024.p0769
25. [25] C.-T. Chen and R.-C. Peng, “Design and 3D printing of paper-based shape memory polymer actuated for soft lightweight fingers,” Smart Mater. Struct., Vol.30, No.7, Article No.075010, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/ac00ca
26. [26] I. Abavisani, O. Rezaifar, and A. Kheyroddin, “Multifunctional properties of shape memory materials in civil engineering applications: A state-of-the-art review,” J. Build. Eng., Vol.44, Article No.102657, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102657
27. [27] S. Yahara, S. Wakimoto, T. Kanda, and K. Matsushita, “McKibben artificial muscle realizing variable contraction characteristics using helical shape-memory polymer fibers,” Sens. Actuators A: Phys., Vol.295, pp. 637-642, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2019.06.012
28. [28] N. Alberto et al., “Incorporation of fiber Bragg sensors for shape memory polyurethanes characterization,” Sensors, Vol.17, No.11, Article No.2600, 2017. https://doi.org/10.3390/S17112600
29. [29] H. Meng et al., “Various shape memory effects of stimuli-responsive shape memory polymers,” Smart Mater. Struct., Vol.22, No.9, Article No.093001, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/22/9/093001
30. [30] P. Ghosh, A. Rao, and A. R. Srinivasa, “Design of multi-state and smart-bias components using Shape Memory Alloy and Shape Memory Polymer composites,” Mater. Des., Vol.44, pp. 164-171, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.05.063
31. [31] Y. Liu, K. Gall, M. L. Dunn, A. R. Greenberg, and J. Diani, “Thermomechanics of shape memory polymers: Uniaxial experiments and constitutive modeling,” Int. J. Plast., Vol.22, No.2, pp. 279-313, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2005.03.004
32. [32] G. Murasawa, S. Yoneyama, K. Tohgo, and M. Takashi, “Distribution of deformation and internal stress in shape memory alloy composite,” Trans. Jpn. Soc. Mech. Eng. A, Vol.71, No.705, pp. 780-788, 2005 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.1299/kikaia.71.780
33. [33] A. Shimamoto, Y. Furuya, and M. Taya, “Active control of crack-tip stress intensity by contraction of shape memory TiNi fibers embedded in epoxy matrix composite: Dependency of stress intensity factor on crack-tip domain size,” Proc. of 11th Int. Conf. Compos. Mater., Vol.6, pp. 493-499, 1997.
34. [34] A. T. Tung, B.-H. Park, D. H. Liang, and G. Niemeyer, “Laser-machined shape memory alloy sensors for position feedback in active catheters,” Sens. Actuators A: Phys., Vol.147, No.1, pp. 83-92, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SNA.2008.03.024
35. [35] S. Terrile, J. Miguelañez, and A. Barrientos, “A soft haptic glove actuated with shape memory alloy and flexible stretch sensors,” Sensors, Vol.21, No.16, Article No.5278, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/S21165278
36. [36] S. H. Nahm, Y. J. Kim, J. M. Kim, and D.-J. Yoon, “A study on the application of Ni-Ti shape memory alloy as a sensor,” Mater. Sci. Forum, Vols.475-479, pp. 2043-2046, 2005. https://doi.org/10.4028/WWW.SCIENTIFIC.NET/MSF.475-479.2043
37. [37] The Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers (Eds.), “JSME Mechanical Engineers’ Handbook (DVD-ROM),” Maruzen Publishing, 2014 (in Japanese).