single-rb.php

JRM Vol.35 No.6 pp. 1638-1644
doi: 10.20965/jrm.2023.p1638
(2023)

Paper:

Experimental Development of Fins for Underwater Robots

Bagus Yunanto*,** ORCID Icon and Naoyuki Takesue* ORCID Icon

*Tokyo Metropolitan University
6-6 Asahigaoka, Hino, Tokyo 191-0065, Japan

**Politeknik Negeri Semarang
Jl. Prof. H. Soedarto S.H., Tembalang, Semarang, Central Java 50275, Indonesia

Received:
July 24, 2023
Accepted:
September 19, 2023
Published:
December 20, 2023
Keywords:
underwater robot, caudal fin, fin shape, drag force, thrust
Abstract

In recent years, underwater robotics has become very important because it can be applied to various fields such as underwater exploration, underwater inspection, marine industry, and environmental monitoring. Fin plays an essential role in the movement of underwater robots, providing operation, control, and efficient propulsion. This research aims to design and develop a unique robotic fin for underwater robots to improve their handling and propulsion efficiency. The goal is to improve the power density and propulsion efficiency of underwater survey robots. The study is based on a comprehensive analysis of experience and a performance evaluation. Five types of tail fin models were used in the study. The experimental results showed that the performance of the fin design can be compared with existing configurations under different conditions. The best design parameters will be determined by analyzing the experimental results. The results of this study will contribute to underwater robotics by providing a concept of the principles of fin design and its impact on the performance of robotics.

Experimental fin setup

Experimental fin setup

Cite this article as:
B. Yunanto and N. Takesue, “Experimental Development of Fins for Underwater Robots,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.35 No.6, pp. 1638-1644, 2023.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] N. Takesue, Y. Hata, and T. Sekiya, “Development of Fish-Like Robot with Elastic Fin,” Industrial Robot, Vol.38, No.3, pp. 252-257, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1108/01439911111122743
  2. [2] P. Duraisamy, R. K. Sidharthan, and M. N. Santhanakrishnan, “Design, Modeling, and Control of Biomimetic Fish Robot: A Review,” J. of Bionic Engineering, Vol.16, No.6, pp. 967-993, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-019-0111-7
  3. [3] J. Kadiyam, C. Mehta, S. Mohan, and D. Deshmukh, “Implementation of a robust motion control scheme for an Ostraciiform inspired underwater robot with caudal and pectoral fins,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, Vol.52, No.21, pp. 283-290, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.12.321
  4. [4] F. A. Naser and M. T. Rashid, “Design and implementation of a swimming robot with pectoral fins only,” Robotica, Vol.40, No.10, pp. 3557-3585, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0263574722000406
  5. [5] Z. Yu, K. Li, Y. Ji, and S. X. Yang, “Designs, motion mechanism, motion coordination, and communication of bionic robot fishes: A survey,” Intelligence & Robotics, Vol.2, No.2, pp. 180-199, 2022. https://doi.org/10.20517/ir.2022.10
  6. [6] J. Zhou, N. Yu, S. Liu, L. Xin, Y. Liu, G. Gao, Z. Na, and X. Hou, “Inspired by the black ghost knifefish: Bionic design of undulatory fin with 2-DOF rays and its propulsion performance,” Applied Bionics and Biomechanics, Vol.2023, Article No.7831175, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/7831175
  7. [7] E. A. Martínez-García, R. Lavrenov, and E. Magid, “Robot fish caudal propulsive mechanisms: A mini-review,” AI, Computer Science and Robotics Technology, Vol.2022, 2022. https://doi.org/10.5772/acrt.09
  8. [8] Y. Shan, Y. E. Bayiz, and B. Cheng, “Efficient thrust generation in robotic fish caudal fins using policy search,” IET Cyber-Systems and Robotics, Vol.1, No.1, pp. 38-44, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-csr.2018.0005
  9. [9] I. Yamamoto, Y. Terada, T. Nagamatu, and Y. Imaizumi, “Propulsion system with flexible/rigid oscillating fin,” IEEE J. of Oceanic Engineering, Vol.20, No.1, pp. 23-30, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1109/48.380249
  10. [10] F. Xie, Q. Zuo, Q. Chen, H. Fang, K. He, R. Du, Y. Zhong, and Z. Li, “Designs of the biomimetic robotic fishes performing body and/or caudal fin (BCF) swimming locomotion: A review,” J. of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, Vol.102, No.1, Article No.13, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-021-01379-1
  11. [11] Y.-C. Lin and D.-N. Zhang, “Experimental and numerical investigations on undulatory motion of a soft-fin-based underwater robot,” J. of Mechanics, Vol.38, pp. 273-283, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1093/jom/ufac021
  12. [12] M. K. Koiri, H. Kumar, P. K. Arora, and A. K. Sharma, “Design and optimization of caudal fin for robotic fish driven by crank-slotted slider and lever mechanism,” J. of Engineering Research, ICMET Special Issue, 2022. https://doi.org/10.36909/jer.ICMET.17187
  13. [13] Y. Takada, R. Araki, Y. Nakanishi, M. Nonogaki, K. Ebita, and T. Wakisaka, “Development of small fish robots powered by small and ultra-light passive-type polymer electrolyte fuel cells,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.22, No.2, pp. 150-157, 2010. https://doi.org/10.20965/jrm.2010.p0150
  14. [14] Y. Takada, K. Koyama, and T. Usami, “Robotic fish,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.26, No.3, pp. 391-393, 2014. https://doi.org/10.20965/jrm.2014.p0391
  15. [15] P. Duraisamy and M. N. Santhanakrishnan, “Hydrodynamic modeling and design of robotic fish using slender body theory,” IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Vol.1012, Article No.012007, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1012/1/012007
  16. [16] K. Divsalar, R. Shafaghat, M. Farhadi, and R. Alamian, “Experimental analysis on hydrodynamic coefficients of an underwater glider with spherical nose for dynamic modeling and motion simulation,” SN Applied Sciences, Vol.3, No.2, Article No.201, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-021-04241-z
  17. [17] L. Chen, S. Bi, Y. Cai, and H. Qiu, “Design and hydrodynamic experiment research on novel biomimetic pectoral fins of a ray-inspired robotic fish,” Machines, Vol.10, No.8, Article No.606, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines10080606
  18. [18] D. Yang and J. Wu, “Hydrodynamic interaction of two self-propelled fish swimming in a tandem arrangement,” Fluids, Vol.7, No.6, Article No.208, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids7060208
  19. [19] S. B. Behbahani and X. Tan, “Role of pectoral fin flexibility in robotic fish performance,” J. of Nonlinear Science, Vol.27, No.4, pp. 1155-1181, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00332-017-9373-6
  20. [20] F. A. Naser and M. T. Rashid, “Enhancement of labriform swimming robot performance based on morphological properties of pectoral fins,” J. of Control, Automation and Electrical Systems, Vol.32, No.4, pp. 927-941, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40313-021-00712-1
  21. [21] F. Nose, Y. Sueoka, D. Nakanishi, Y. Sugimoto, and K. Osuka, “Design of fin-curvature-based feedback controller for efficient swimming,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.33, No.4, pp. 955-967, 2021. https://doi.org/10.20965/jrm.2021.p0955
  22. [22] K. Shibuya, Y. Kishimoto, and S. Yoshii, “Depth control of underwater robot with metal bellows mechanism for buoyancy control device utilizing phase transition,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.25, No.5, pp. 795-803, 2013. https://doi.org/10.20965/jrm.2013.p0795
  23. [23] F. Takemura, S. Kobashigawa, K. Hirayama, K. Kawabata, S. Sagara, H. Yamashiro, and E. Kuraya, “Development of an acetic acid injection device for crown-of-thorns starfish controlled by a remotely operated underwater robot,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.27, No.5, pp. 571-578, 2015. https://doi.org/10.20965/jrm.2015.p0571
  24. [24] C. K.-C. Ng, P. A.-C. Ooi, W.-L. Wong, and G. Khoo, “A Review of fish taxonomy conventions and species identification techniques,” J. of Survey in Fisheries Sciences, Vol.4, No.1, pp. 54-93, 2017. https://doi.org/10.17762/sfs.v4i1.140

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on May. 19, 2024