Kobe City, Japan, has become one of the leading innovators and adopters of disaster prevention strategies and technologies since the 1995 Great Hanshin–Awaji Earthquake, one of Japan’s deadliest disasters. In the years that have followed, the foreign population of Kobe City has risen by approximately 36% and is expected to continue growing. This paper investigates the factors that increase the likelihood of foreign residents participating in community-based disaster prevention behaviors and to be aware of official sources of disaster prevention information. It uses probit analysis with original data from the 2023 Kobe City Foreign Residents Survey and the WorldRiskIndex. The study reveals that certain factors, such as language ability, are highly nuanced and may not be as strong a barrier to adequate disaster prevention knowledge in Japan as commonly believed. It also identifies potential key points for information distribution. However, regardless of nationality or the risk of disaster in their countries of origin, survey results indicate that foreign residents are not active participants in disaster prevention behaviors, nor are they widely aware of the official services and materials.

1. [1] Geospatial Information Authority of Japan, “GSI Maps (Chiriin Chizu).” https://maps.gsi.go.jp/ [Accessed January 20, 2026]
2. [2] Policy Division, Planning and Coordination Bureau, Kobe City, “Gaikokujin no jinkō [Foreign resident population],” Kobe City Statistical Portal, 2025 (in Japanese). https://www.city.kobe.lg.jp/a47946/shise/tokei/jinkou/kokusekibetsu.html [Accessed June 30, 2025].
3. [3] Kobe University, “2023 Kobe City foreign residents survey dataset,” 2023 (unpublished).
4. [4] Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake Disaster Countermeasures Headquarters, Kobe City, “Hanshin-Awaji daishinsai: Kobe-shi no kiroku 1995-nen [Kobe City’s records of the Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake 1995],” 1996 (in Japanese).
5. [5] Secretariat of the National Committee for the International Decade for Natural Disaster Reduction, “Hanshin-Awaji daishinsai ni okeru Zainichi Gaikokujin hisai jōkyō chōsa [Survey on the impact of the Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake on foreign residents in Japan],” 1995 (in Japanese).
6. [6] R. Kusunoki and K. Hashimoto, “Is ‘easy Japanese’ a language option? Local responses to the increasing foreign resident population from Southeast Asia,” Asian Stud. Rev., Vol.46, No.4, pp. 613-630, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2022.2075322
7. [7] S. Uekusa, “Disaster linguicism: Linguistic minorities in disasters,” Lang. Soc., Vol.48, No.3, pp. 353-375, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404519000150
8. [8] S. Uekusa and S. Matthewman, “Preparing multilingual disaster communication for the crises of tomorrow: A conceptual discussion,” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., Vol.87, Article No.103589, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103589
9. [9] M. Henry, A. Kawasaki, and K. Meguro, “Disaster information-gathering behavior after the Tohoku Earthquake Part 2: Results of foreign respondents,” Proc. 10th Int. Symp. New Technol. Urban Saf. Mega Cities Asia, 2011.
10. [10] M. Henry, A. Kawasaki, and K. Meguro, “Foreigners’ disaster information gathering behavior after the 2011 Tohoku Earthquake Part 3: Analysis of foreign students considering their post-disaster action,” Seisan Kenkyu, Vol.64, No.4, pp. 497-503, 2012. https://doi.org/10.11188/seisankenkyu.64.497
11. [11] M. F. Shah and O. Murao, “Foreigners’ evacuation behavior in the Great East Japan Earthquake: A case of Iwaki City in Fukushima Prefecture,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.8, No.sp, pp. 802-813, 2013. https://doi.org/10.20965/jdr.2013.p0802
12. [12] I. Petraroli and R. C. Baars, “Disaster preparedness communication and perception of foreign residents in Kansai, Japan: A socio-cultural study,” Aust. J. Emerg. Manag., Vol.37, No.2, pp. 81-89, 2022. https://doi.org/10.47389/37.2.81
13. [13] M. B. F. Bisri and A. Sakurai, “Foreign residents’ risk perception and disaster preparedness outreach in Kobe City,” Proc. 9th Annu. Int. Workshop Expo Sumatran Tsunami Disaster Recovery, pp. 29-40, 2014.
14. [14] A. Iizuka, “Disaster perception and preparation among foreign versus local university students in Japan: A comparative study,” Prog. Disaster Sci., Vol.15, Article No.100239, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2022.100239
15. [15] M. Nishiyama and G. H. Glauberman, “Disaster preparedness among foreign residents in a rural area of Japan: A qualitative pilot study,” Health Emerg. Disaster Nurs., Vol.9, No.1, pp. 62-73, 2022. https://doi.org/10.24298/hedn.2020-0013
16. [16] K. Phuaknian and Y. Toyoda, “Factors contributing to community-based disaster risk reduction for foreign residents in Japan,” J. Asia-Japan Res. Inst. Ritsumeikan Univ., Vol.4, pp. 158-174, 2022.
17. [17] Benazir, Syamsidik, Y. Idris, and N. P. Putra, “Connecting community’s perspectives on tsunami risk to anticipated future tsunamis: A reflection from a coastal community in Aceh-Indonesia, after 19 years of the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami,” Geoenviron. Disasters, Vol.10, Article No.21, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40677-023-00252-7
18. [18] S. Wang, J. Iwata, and H. Hatakeyama, “A survey on the disaster preparedness status of foreign residents in Japan,” Proc. 28th Int. Conf. Comput. Educ., Vol.2, pp. 246-253, 2020.
19. [19] R. Dasgupta, M. Basu, P. Kumar, B. A. Johnson, B. K. Mitra, R. Avtar, and R. Shaw, “A rapid indicator-based assessment of foreign resident preparedness in Japan during Typhoon Hagibis,” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., Vol.51, Article No.101849, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101849
20. [20] J. S. Becker, D. Paton, D. M. Johnston, K. R. Ronan, and J. McClure, “The role of prior experience in informing and motivating earthquake preparedness,” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., Vol.22, pp. 179-193, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.03.006
21. [21] D. N. Sattler, C. F. Kaiser, and J. B. Hittner, “Disaster preparedness: Relationships among prior experience, personal characteristics, and distress,” J. Appl. Soc. Psychol., Vol.30, No.7, pp. 1396-1420, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02527.x
22. [22] T. Kato, “Sharing experience by residents of past disaster sites: Effects of time from disasters and types of experience,” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., Vol.61, Article No.102390, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102390
23. [23] K. F. Gotham and B. Powers, “Constructing and contesting resilience in post-disaster urban communities,” J. Hannigan and G. Richards (Eds.), “The Sage handbook of new urban studies,” pp. 139-154, SAGE Publications, 2017.
24. [24] Y. Matsuda and N. Okada, “Relevance analysis between indirect disaster experience and household earthquake preparedness,” Annu. Disaster Prev. Res. Inst. Kyoto Univ., Ser. B, Vol.49, pp. 155-165, 2006.
25. [25] M. M. Ikeda and A. G. Ozanne, “Human security, social competence and natural disasters in Japan and New Zealand: A case study of Filipino migrants,” Japan Soc. Innov. J., Vol.6, No.1, pp. 42-60, 2016. https://doi.org/10.12668/jsij.6.42
26. [26] Y. Liu, L. Cao, D. Yang, and B. C. Anderson, “How social capital influences community resilience management development,” Environ. Sci. Policy, Vol.136, pp. 642-651, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.07.028
27. [27] Bündnis Entwicklung Hilft and IFHV, “World risk report 2023,” 2023. https://weltrisikobericht.de/en/ [Accessed June 30, 2025]
28. [28] Hyogo Prefectural Government, “Reiwa 4th year (2022) Hyogo Prefectural resident monitor survey report,” 2023 (in Japanese). https://web.pref.hyogo.lg.jp/kk04/documents/r4-4monitor.pdf [Accessed October 24, 2025]
29. [29] Kobe City Government, “2024 Kobe City net monitor survey report,” Kobe City Government, 2024 (in Japanese). https://www.city.kobe.lg.jp/documents/73233/20240801netmonitor.pdf [Accessed October 24, 2025]
30. [30] M. Verkuyten, “The integration paradox: Empirical evidence from the Netherlands,” Am. Behav. Sci., Vol.60, Nos.5-6, pp. 583-596, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764216632838
31. [31] I. Petraroli and J. Singer, “Gender in Japan: The unseen aspect of natural disaster risks,” Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Gender Res., 2020. https://doi.org/10.34190/IGR.20.058
32. [32] I. Petraroli and R. Baars, “To be a woman in Japan: Disaster vulnerabilities and gendered discourses in disaster preparedness in Japan,” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., Vol.70, Article No.102767, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102767
33. [33] L. Dominelli, “Rethinking masculinity in disaster situations: Men’s reflections on the 2004 tsunami in southern Sri Lanka,” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., Vol.48, Article No.101594, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101594
34. [34] Council of Local Authorities for International Relations, “FY2024 business report (annual report 2024–2025),” 2025 (in Japanese). https://www.clair.or.jp/j/clair/docs/01_R6jigyohokoku.pdf [Accessed October 24, 2025]
35. [35] Kobe City Board of Education, “International education in Kobe City,” 2025 (in Japanese). https://www.city.kobe.lg.jp/a73576/kyouiku/kokusai/kokusai_education.html [Accessed October 24, 2025]