This paper reports the application of a “Clinical Rural Planning (CRP)” approach in the Najimi District of Wajima City, Ishikawa Prefecture, which suffered extensive damage in the 2024 Noto Peninsula Earthquake (NE2024). The Najimi District comprises 11 hamlets, including Shiroyone Senmaida, a terraced rice field recognized as a Globally Important Agricultural Heritage System. The earthquake devastated homes, farmland, and essential community infrastructure. During the recovery, a gap emerged between government-led plans that prioritized urban-centered reconstruction and the strong desire of residents to remain in their home communities. In response, the authors employed insights from rural planning and clinical sociology to attentively listen to the thoughts and needs of the affected residents and assist in articulating their recovery priorities. Through local workshops and structured dialogues with government officials, they helped build a process that conveyed the voices of residents to administrative bodies. In this approach, researchers did not act as conventional investigators but as partners—emphasizing trust-building and empathetic dialogue. The CRP was operationalized through informal group dialogues and hamlet-level participatory workshops that produced written request lists that were subsequently used to structure a public meeting with the Mayor. The process demonstrated the effectiveness of CRP in converting situated community needs into actionable administrative agendas while maintaining ethical engagement and avoiding research fatigue.

1. [1] https://www.bousai.go.jp/updates/r60101notojishin/r60101notojishin/index.html [Accessed July 17, 2025]
2. [2] https://www.pref.ishikawa.lg.jp/saigai/202401jishin-taisakuhonbu.html#kaiken [Accessed July 17, 2025]
3. [3] R. Yamashita, “Current status and challenges in the recovery and revitalization of rural communities and agricultural management,” J. of Japanese Society Irrigation, Drainage and Rural Engineering, Vol.93, No.3, pp. 179-182, 2025 (in Japanese).
4. [4] https://www.bosai.yomiuri.co.jp/biz-article/16014 [Accessed July 19, 2025]
5. [5] https://rural-planning.jp/ [Accessed July 20, 2025]
6. [6] Science Council of Japan, “New settlement areas and rural planning research,” Report of the Liaison Committee on Rural Planning Studies, 1997 (in Japanese). https://www.scj.go.jp/ja/info/kohyo/14/16-31.pdf
7. [7] J. Diehl, K. Asahiro, Y. Hwang, T. Hirashima, L. Kong, Z. Wang, H. Yao, and P. Tan, “A CHANS approach to investigating post-disaster recovery potential in rural Japan,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.17, No.3, pp. 453-463, 2022. https://doi.org/10.20965/jdr.2022.p0453
8. [8] M. Ishiwatari, M. Ohara, K. Razak, M. Inoue, X. Zheng, and R. Shaw, “Transdisciplinary approach: Toward innovative recovery and disaster risk reduction,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.19, No.3, pp. 534-538, 2024. https://doi.org/10.20965/jdr.2024.p0534
9. [9] L. Wirth, “Clinical sociology,” Clinical Sociology Review, Vol.1, pp. 7-22, 1982.
10. [10] J. A. Freedman, “Clinical sociology: What it is and what it isn’t – A perspective,” Clinical Sociology Review, Vol.1, pp. 34-49, 1982.
11. [11] O. Sukmana, “The role of community social worker in participatory action research-based community empowerment process in Indonesia,” Int. J. of Social Sciences and Management Review, Vol.6, No.1, pp.259-275, 2023. https://doi.org/10.37602/IJSSMR.2022.6118
12. [12] E. Porio, “Climate resilience initiative in Metro Manila: Participatory community risk assessment and power in community interventions,” J. M. Fritz (Eds.), “International Clinical Sociology,” pp. 257-276, Springer, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54584-0_14
13. [13] E. Porio, “Essentials of community intervention,” J. M. Fritz and J. Rhéaume (Eds.), “Community Intervention: Clinical Sociology Perspectives,” pp. 17-34, Springer, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93695-2_2
14. [14] J. Rhéaume, “Research for the community,” J. M. Fritz and J. Rhéaume (Eds.), “Community Intervention: Clinical Sociology Perspectives,” pp. 35-48, Springer, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93695-2_3
15. [15] Y. Uchikawa, “Characteristics of agricultural land and livelihood structure in the Noto region and direction of development toward reconstruction from the earthquake,” J. of Rural Planning, Vol.43, No.4, pp. 170-173, 2025 (in Japanese).
16. [16] K. Honda, S. Abeysinghe, C. Leppold, A. L. Williams, A. Ozaki, and A. Goto, “Ethically researching health and disaster: Lessons from over a decade of research since the 3.11 disaster in Fukushima,” JMA J., Vol.7, No.2, pp. 279-281, 2024. https://doi.org/10.31662/jmaj.2023-0145
17. [17] Y. Hara, K. Takeda, R. Yamashita, R. Saito, D. Sasaki, K. Hayashi, and T. Aoki, “The ‘fallacy of composition’ as an ethical challenge facing scientific research in disaster-affected areas: The 2024 Noto Peninsula Earthquake and Tsunami,” Int. J. of Disaster Risk Reduction, Vol.119, Article No.105359, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105359
18. [18] https://sites.google.com/view/najilab/ [Accessed July 26, 2025]
19. [19] J. Hirota, “Damage and reconstruction of village communities in the Great East Japan Earthquake and tsunami: Focusing the sustainability,” J. of Rural Planning, Vol.39, No.4, pp. 350-357, 2021 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.2750/arp.39.350