Top > JDR > Social and Political Roots of Loss and Damage: A Study of Vuln ...

single-dr.php

JDR Vol.20 No.5 pp. 710-725
(2025)
doi: 10.20965/jdr.2025.p0710

Paper:

Views over last 60 days: 29

Social and Political Roots of Loss and Damage: A Study of Vulnerable Coastal Communities in Greater Jakarta

Gusti Ayu Ketut Surtiari*1,† ORCID Icon, Syarifah Aini Dalimunthe*1 ORCID Icon, Daisuke Sasaki*2 ORCID Icon, Miko Maekawa*3 ORCID Icon, Nirma Yossa*1 ORCID Icon, Yogi Setya Permana*4 ORCID Icon, Anggi Afriansyah*1 ORCID Icon, Vanda Ningrum*1 ORCID Icon, Deshinta Vibriyanti*1 ORCID Icon, Sari Seftiani*1 ORCID Icon, Yasuhito Jibiki*5, Yuta Hara*2 ORCID Icon, and Nawawi*1 ORCID Icon

*1Research Center for Population, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN)
Gedung Widya Graha Lantai 8, Jl. Jenderal Gatot Subroto No.10, DKI Jakarta 12710, Indonesia

†Corresponding author

*2International Research Institute of Disaster Science (IRIDeS), Tohoku University
Sendai, Japan

*3The Sasakawa Peace Foundation
Tokyo, Japan

*4Research Center for Politics, BRIN
DKI Jakarta, Indonesia

*5Center for Integrated Disaster Information Research, Interfaculty Initiative in Information Studies, The University of Tokyo
Tokyo, Japan

Received:
April 30, 2025
Accepted:
September 8, 2025
Published:
October 1, 2025
Creative Commons License
Keywords:
loss and damage, climate change adaptation, sea level rise, coastal community, Jakarta
Abstract

This study investigates the root causes of loss and damage in climate-vulnerable coastal communities, or kampungs, in Greater Jakarta, highlighting how climatic stressors interact with local development pathways. Drawing from in-depth discussions with 64 informants in North Jakarta and Tangerang Regency, representing four and one selected kampungs, respectively, this study analyzes how environmental degradation, urban growth, and relocation pressures have affected kampung residents. The findings reveal spatial contestation, inequality, precarious livelihoods, and injustice, which together intensify vulnerability and lead to unavoidable impacts of climate change. These dynamics are shaped by exclusionary development processes, unequal adaptation impacts, and a lack of inclusive decision-making with communities. Using the conceptual framework of critical vulnerability theory, this research illustrates how governance and power relations influence both urban coastal risk and adaptive capacity. The study provides insights on justice-oriented and equitable approaches to addressing loss and damage in rapidly urbanizing areas in Southeast Asia.

Cite this article as:
G. Surtiari, S. Dalimunthe, D. Sasaki, M. Maekawa, N. Yossa, Y. Permana, A. Afriansyah, V. Ningrum, D. Vibriyanti, S. Seftiani, Y. Jibiki, Y. Hara, and Nawawi, “Social and Political Roots of Loss and Damage: A Study of Vulnerable Coastal Communities in Greater Jakarta,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.20 No.5, pp. 710-725, 2025.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] P. van der Keur et al., “Identification and analysis of uncertainty in disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation in South and Southeast Asia,” Int. J. of Disaster Risk Reduction, Vol.16, pp. 208-214, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.03.002
  2. [2] L. V. T. Noi et al., “Climate change risk assessment and adaptation for loss and damage of urban transportation infrastructure in Southeast Asia,” APN Science Bulletin, Vol.11, No.1, pp. 57-73, 2021. https://doi.org/10.30852/sb.2021.1436
  3. [3] A. Revi et al., “Towards transformative adaptation in cities: The IPCC’s Fifth Assessment,” Environment and Urbanization, Vol.26, No.1, pp. 11-68, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247814523539
  4. [4] Y. Simanovsky, “Climate change & urbanization risks in coastal cities,” TU Delft, 2017.
  5. [5] R. Berndtsson et al., “Drivers of changing urban flood risk: A framework for action,” J. of Environmental Management, Vol.240, pp. 47-56, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.094
  6. [6] E. Rustiadi et al., “Jabodetabek Megacity: From city development toward urban complex management system,” R. B. Singh (Ed.), “Urban Development Challenges, Risks and Resilience in Asian Mega Cities,” pp. 421-445, Springer, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55043-3_22
  7. [7] International Organisation for Migration (IOM), “Migration, climate change and the environment,” 2009.
  8. [8] Y. Budiyono, “Flood risk modeling in Jakarta: Development and usefulness in a time of climate change,” Vrije Universiteit, Netherlands, 2018.
  9. [9] B. I. Nasution et al., “Urban vulnerability to floods investigation in Jakarta, Indonesia: A hybrid optimized fuzzy spatial clustering and news media analysis approach,” Int. J. of Disaster Risk Reduction, Vol.83, Article No.103407, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103407
  10. [10] M. Garschagen, G. A. K. Surtiari, and M. Harb, “Is Jakarta’s new flood risk reduction strategy transformational?,” Sustainability, Vol.10, No.8, Article No.2934, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082934
  11. [11] G. A. K. Surtiari et al., “Investing in flood adaptation in Jakarta, Indonesia,” A. N. Martins et al. (Eds), “Investing in Disaster Risk Reduction for Resilience,” pp. 257-275, Elsevier, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818639-8.00006-5
  12. [12] M. Wannewitz and M. Garschagen, “Mapping the adaptation solution space – Lessons from Jakarta for other coastal cities,” Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, Vol.21, No.11, pp. 3285-3322, 2021. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2020-370
  13. [13] W. Salim, K. Bettinger, and M. Fisher, “Maladaptation on the waterfront: Jakarta’s growth coalition and the great Garuda,” Environment and Urbanization ASIA, Vol.10, No.1, pp. 63-80, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1177/0975425318821809
  14. [14] M. Garschagen et al., “Progress and gaps in climate change adaptation in coastal cities across the globe,” Nature Cities, Vol.1, pp. 610-619, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44284-024-00106-9
  15. [15] E. L. F. Schipper, “Maladaptation: When adaptation to climate change goes very wrong,” One Earth, Vol.3, No.4, pp. 409-414, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.09.014
  16. [16] E. Roberts and M. Pelling, “Loss and damage: An opportunity for transformation?,” Climate Policy, Vol.20, No.6, pp. 758-771, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1680336
  17. [17] C. Huggel et al., “Loss and damage attribution,” Nature Climate Change, Vol.3, No.8, pp. 694-696, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1961
  18. [18] M. Pill, “Re-framing non-economic losses to non-economic impacts for effective policymaking: evidence from the Caribbean,” Climate and Development, Vol.14, No.8, pp. 770-779, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2021.1987852
  19. [19] O. M. Serdeczny, S. Bauer, and S. Huq, “Non-economic losses from climate change: Opportunities for policy-oriented research,” Climate and Development, Vol.10, Issue 2, pp. 97-101, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2017.1372268
  20. [20] R. James et al., “Characterizing loss and damage from climate change,” Nature Climate Change, Vol.4, No.11, pp. 938-939, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2411
  21. [21] E. Boyd et al., “A typology of loss and damage perspectives,” Nature Climate Change, Vol.7, No.10, pp. 723-729, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3389
  22. [22] K. Warner and K. van der Geest, “Loss and damage from climate change: Local-level evidence from nine vulnerable countries,” Int. J. of Global Warming, Vol.5, No.4, pp. 367-386, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGW.2013.057289
  23. [23] K. Warner and K. van der Geest, “Loss and damage in the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (Working Group II): A text-mining analysis,” Climate Policy, Vol.20, No.6, pp. 729-742, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1704678
  24. [24] K. van der Geest, “A conceptual framework and research design for assessing losses and damages from climate change in vulnerable communities,” V. Wijenayake et al. (Eds.), “Linking Climate Change Adaptation, Disaster Risk Reduction, and Loss & Damage,” pp. 69-99, Springer, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8055-0_5
  25. [25] T. Meshkani, “Climate change and flooding: Governmental responses to displacement and relocation in Jakarta’s informal neighborhoods,” Int. J. of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment , Vol.15, Issue 4, pp. 551-570, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDRBE-02-2023-0037
  26. [26] G. A. K. Surtiari et al., “Culture and community resilience to flooding: Case study of the urban coastal community in Jakarta,” R. Djalante et al. (Eds.), “Disaster Risk Reduction in Indonesia: Progress, Challenges, and Issues,” pp. 469-494, Springer, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54466-3_19
  27. [27] H. A. H. A. Simarmata and G. A. K. Surtiari, “Adaptation to climate change: Decision making and opportunities for transformation in Jakarta, Indonesia,” United Nations Research Institute for Social Development, 2019. https://www.unrisd.org/en/library/publications/adaptation-to-climate-change-decision-making-and-opportunities-for-transformation-in-jakarta-indones [Accessed September 22, 2025]
  28. [28] K. E. McNamara and G. Jackson, “Loss and damage: A review of the literature and directions for future research,” WIREs Climate Change, Vol.10, No.2, Article No.e564, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.564
  29. [29] L. Vanhala and C. Hestbaek, “Framing climate change loss and damage in UNFCCC negotiations,” Global Environmental Politics, Vol.16, No.4, pp. 111-129, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00379
  30. [30] T. Cannon and D. Müller-Mahn, “Vulnerability, resilience and development discourses in context of climate change,” Natural Hazards, Vol.55, No.3, pp. 621-635, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9499-4
  31. [31] H. M. Füssel, “Vulnerability: A generally applicable conceptual framework for climate change research,” Global Environmental Change, Vol.17, No.2, pp. 155-167, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.05.002
  32. [32] A. Y. Daramola et al., “Adaptive capacity and coping response strategies to natural disasters: A study in Nigeria,” Int. J. of Disaster Risk Reduction, Vol.15, pp. 132-147, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.01.007
  33. [33] C. Termeer et al., “Coping with the wicked problem of climate adaptation across scales: The five R governance capabilities,” Landscape and Urban, Vol.154, pp. 11-19, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.01.007
  34. [34] A. Lesnikowski et al., “What does the Paris Agreement mean for adaptation?,” Climate Policy, Vol.17, No.7, pp. 825-831, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2016.1248889
  35. [35] L. Berrang-Ford et al., “What drives national adaptation? A global assessment,” Climatic Change, Vol.124, No.1, pp. 441-450, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1078-3
  36. [36] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, “Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability,” 2014. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg2/ [Accessed September 22, 2025]
  37. [37] J. C. Villagrán de León, “Vulnerability: A conceptual and methodological review,” Studies of the University: Research, Counsel, Education, No.4, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
  38. [38] D. Schlosberg, L. B. Collins, and S. Niemeyer, “Adaptation policy and community discourse: risk, vulnerability, and just transformation,” Environmental Politics, Vol.26, Issue 3, pp. 413-437, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1287628
  39. [39] P. Romero-Lankao, D. M. Gnatz, and J. B. Sperling, “Examining urban inequality and vulnerability to enhance resilience: Insights from Mumbai, India,” Climate Change, Vol.139, No.3-4, pp. 351-365, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1813-z
  40. [40] C. Kuhlicke et al., “Contextualizing social vulnerability: Findings from case studies across Europe,” Natural Hazards, Vol.58, No.2, pp. 789-810, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9751-6
  41. [41] I. M. Otto et al., “Social vulnerability to climate change: A review of concepts and evidence,” Regional Environmental Change, Vol.17, No.6, pp. 1651-1662, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-017-1105-9
  42. [42] N. A. Marshall et al., “Social vulnerability to climate change in primary producers: A typology approach,” Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, Vol.186, pp. 86-93, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.01.004
  43. [43] R. A. R. King and K. L. Blackmore, “Physical and political boundaries as barriers to the continuity of social vulnerability,” Applied Geography, Vol.44, pp. 79-87, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.07.011
  44. [44] M. Purcell, “Possible worlds: Henri Lefebvre and the right to the city,” J. of Urban Affairs,, Vol.36, Issue 1, pp. 141-154, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1111/juaf.12034
  45. [45] A. O’Loghlen and C. McWilliams, “The nexus of displacement, asset vulnerability and the right to the city: The case of the refugees and urban poor of Dar es Salaam,” Int. J. of Urban Sustainable Development, Vol.9, No.1, pp. 21-45, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2016.1254088
  46. [46] S. Hain, “Struggle for the Inner City—A plan becomes a declaration of war,” W. J. V. Neill and H.-U. Schwedler (Eds.), “Urban Planning and Cultural Inclusion,” pp. 69-84, Springer, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230524064_5
  47. [47] H. L. P. Mees et al., “From citizen participation to government participation: An exploration of the roles of local governments in community initiatives for climate change adaptation in the Netherlands,” Environmental Policy and Governance, Vol.29, Issue 3, pp.198-208, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1847
  48. [48] T. Jiang et al., “Understandings of assessment reports on climate change impacts, adaptation and vulnerability: Progress from IPCC AR5 to AR6, Trans. of Atmospheric Sciences,” Vol.45, No.4, pp. 502-511, 2022 (in Chinese). https://doi.org/10.13878/j.cnki.dqkxxb.20220529013
  49. [49] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, “Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report,” Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2023. https://doi.org/10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647
  50. [50] R. J. T. Klein et al., “Adaptation opportunities, constraints, and limits,” C. B. Field et al. (Eds.), “Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,” pp. 899-943, Cambridge University Press, 2015.
  51. [51] J. Barnett et al., “From barriers to limits to climate change adaptation: Path dependency and the speed of change,” Ecology and Society, Vol.20, No.3, Article No.5, 2015. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07698-200305
  52. [52] A. Hurlimann et al., “Urban planning and sustainable adaptation to sea-level rise,” Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol.126, pp. 84-93, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.12.013
  53. [53] E. L. F. Schipper, “Maladaptation: When adaptation to climate change goes very wrong,” One Earth, Vol.3, No.4, pp. 409-414, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.09.014
  54. [54] J. Barnett, “The dilemmas of normalising losses from climate change: Towards hope for Pacific atoll countries,” Asia Pacific Viewpoint, Vol.58, No.1, pp. 3-13, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/apv.12153
  55. [55] M. Potschin et al., “Nature-based solutions,” OpenNESS Ecosystem Service Reference Book, 2016. https://oppla.eu/sites/default/files/old_files/uploads/spnature-based-solutions.pdf
  56. [56] R. Lafortezza and G. Sanesi, “Nature-based solutions: Settling the issue of sustainable urbanization,” Environmental Research, Vol.172, pp. 394-398, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.12.063
  57. [57] M. Van den Bosch and Å. O. Sang, “Urban natural environments as nature-based solutions for improved public health – A systematic review of reviews,” Environmental Research, Vol.158, pp. 373-384, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.05.040
  58. [58] N. Seddon et al., “Understanding the value and limits of nature-based solutions to climate change and other global challenges,” Philosophical Trans. of the Royal Society B, Vol.375, Issue 1794, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0120
  59. [59] S. A. Dalimunthe et al., “Community interaction with mangroves as a nature-based solution in the mangrove forest of Southern Bali,” IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Vol.1479, Article No.012047, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1479/1/012047
  60. [60] N. Kabisch et al., “Nature-based solutions to climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban areas: perspectives on indicators, knowledge gaps, barriers, and opportunities for action,” Ecology and Society, Vol.21, No.2, Article No.39, 2016. http://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08373-210239
  61. [61] S. Pauleit et al., “Nature-based solutions and climate change – Four shades of green,” N. Kabisch et al. (Eds.), “Nature-Based Solutions to Climate Change Adaptation in Urban Areas,” pp. 29-49, Springer, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56091-5_3
  62. [62] S. A. Dalimunthe, “Who manages space? Eco-DRR and the local community,” Sustainability, Vol.10, No.6, Article No.1705, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061705
  63. [63] G. D. Dabelko and K. Conca, “Green planet blues: Critical perspectives on global environmental politics,” Routledge, 2019. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429322204
  64. [64] T. Elmqvist et al., “Urbanization, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Challenges and Opportunities: A Global Assessment,” Springer, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7088-1
  65. [65] E. Brink et al., “Cascades of green: A review of ecosystem-based adaptation in urban areas,” Global Environmental Change, Vol.36, pp. 111-123, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.11.003
  66. [66] P. Blaikie et al., “At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability and Disasters,” Routledge, 1994. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203974575

Creative Commons License  This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationa License.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Sep. 30, 2025