single-dr.php

JDR Vol.20 No.5 pp. 585-597
(2025)
doi: 10.20965/jdr.2025.p0585

Paper:

Characteristics of Coseismic Uplift on Ports for Great Earthquakes Along the Nankai Trough: Preparing for Advance Countermeasures

Yuji Dohi*,† ORCID Icon, Hiromitsu Nakamura*, Hiroyuki Fujiwara*, and Sho Akagi**

*National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Resilience
3-1 Tennoudai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0006, Japan

Corresponding author

**Mitsubishi Electric Software Corporation
Tsukuba, Japan

Received:
March 18, 2025
Accepted:
June 6, 2025
Published:
October 1, 2025
Keywords:
coseismic uplift, port, Nankai Trough, great earthquake
Abstract

Advance countermeasures are crucial to address future great earthquakes along the Nankai Trough. Damage caused not only by strong ground motion and tsunami but also by coseismic uplift was reported following previous major earthquakes. If coseismic uplift causes a port to cease to function, there is concern regarding the impact on fisheries and logistics, and whether it can function as a disaster-management base, e.g., for transporting emergency goods and evacuating residents. To understand the characteristics of coseismic uplift on ports, we analyzed coseismic uplift on ports for great earthquakes along the Nankai Trough. Specifically, considering the variety of great earthquake occurrences along the Nankai Trough, we analyzed the amount and likelihood of coseismic uplift for more than 900,000 occurrence patterns and discussed the extent of port functioning as a disaster-management base. This study revealed that, when an M9-class earthquake occurs, some emergency relief ships may not be able to berth at ports positioned as disaster-management hubs. Additionally, when an M8- to M9-class earthquake occurs, some ports may not function to the same extent as before. The results of this study and related discussions, such as ports’ function as disaster-management bases and the impact on fisheries and logistics, are expected to contribute to the advancement of effective preparedness and countermeasures for ports against future great earthquakes along the Nankai Trough.

Cite this article as:
Y. Dohi, H. Nakamura, H. Fujiwara, and S. Akagi, “Characteristics of Coseismic Uplift on Ports for Great Earthquakes Along the Nankai Trough: Preparing for Advance Countermeasures,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.20 No.5, pp. 585-597, 2025.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] Earthquake Research Committee, Headquarters for Earthquake Research Promotion, “Long-term evaluation of seismic activities along the Nankai Trough (2nd edition),” 2013 (in Japanese). https://www.jishin.go.jp/main/chousa/kaikou_pdf/nankai_2.pdf [Accessed February 28, 2025]
  2. [2] Earthquake Research Committee, Headquarters for Earthquake Research Promotion, “Update for earthquake occurrence probability based on long term evaluation,” 2025 (in Japanese). https://www.static.jishin.go.jp/resource/evaluation/long_term_evaluation/updates/prob2025.pdf [Accessed February 28, 2025]
  3. [3] Earthquake Research Committee, Headquarters for Earthquake Research Promotion, “National seismic hazard maps for Japan (2020),” 2021 (in Japanese). https://www.jishin.go.jp/evaluation/seismic_hazard_map/shm_report/shm_report_2020/ [Accessed February 28, 2025]
  4. [4] Earthquake Research Committee, Headquarters for Earthquake Research Promotion, “Probabilistic hazard assessment of tsunami due to large earthquakes along the Nankai Trough,” 2020 (in Japanese), https://www.jishin.go.jp/evaluation/tsunami_evaluation/ [Accessed February 28, 2025]
  5. [5] Cabinet Office, Government of Japan, “Committee for modeling a Nankai Trough megaquake,” (in Japanese). https://www.bousai.go.jp/jishin/nankai/model/ [Accessed February 15, 2025]
  6. [6] Cabinet Office, Government of Japan, “Working group on the Nankai Trough megaquake,” (in Japanese). https://www.bousai.go.jp/jishin/nankai/taisaku_wg/index.html [Accessed February 15, 2025]
  7. [7] Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, “Technical Committee for Recovery and Reconstruction from the 2024 Noto Peninsula earthquake in fishing areas,” 2024 (in Japanese). https://www.jfa.maff.go.jp/j/gyoko_gyozyo/g_zyoho_bako/gizyutu_kentokai/gizyutu_kentokai.html [Accessed February 13, 2025]
  8. [8] Earthquake Preparedness Division, Shizuoka Prefecture, “Overview of the Tonankai Earthquake: Reinvestigation in Shizuoka Prefecture,” 1986 (in Japanese).
  9. [9] M. Hashimoto, K. Ozawa, and Y. Kano, “Examination of uplift at the Murotsu Port based on documents including the Kubono family documents,” J. Jpn. Soc. Nat. Disaster Sci., Vol.42, No.4, pp. 387-404, 2024 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.24762/jndsj.42.4_387
  10. [10] T. Hatori, “Field investigation of the Tokai Tsunamis in 1707 and 1854 along the Shizuoka Coast,” Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst., Univ. Tokyo, Vol.52, pp. 407-439, 1977 (in Japanese).
  11. [11] Hydrographic Bureau, “Report on the Nankai Earthquake in 1946 (change of the land surface and damage),” Hydrogr. Bull., Special Number, 1948 (in Japanese).
  12. [12] K. Iida, “On the earthquake damage, crustal deformation and occurrance of the Tonankai earthquake, 1944,” Bull. Aichi Inst. Tech., Vol.11, pp. 85-94, 1976 (in Japanese).
  13. [13] K. Iida, “History of tsunami damage in Aichi Prefecture,” Subcommittee for Earthquake, Aichi Prefectural Disaster Management Council, 1981 (in Japanese).
  14. [14] A. Imamura, “On crustal deformations associated with the Nankaido earthquake of 1707,” J. Seismol. Soc. Jpn., Ser.1, Vol.2, pp. 81-88, 1930 (in Japanese).
  15. [15] A. Imamura, “Comparison of crustal deformations between the Kii-Peninsula and Muroto-Peninsula,” J. Seismol. Soc. Jpn., Ser.1, Vol.6, pp. 535-540, 1934 (in Japanese).
  16. [16] K. Ishibashi, “Nankai Trough Great Earthquake—History, science and society,” Iwanami Shoten, 2014 (in Japanese).
  17. [17] H. Kawasumi, “Actual conditions of coseismic and postseismic crustal deformation of the Great Nankai Earthquake I on 21 December 1946 in the Shikoku Region,” Report on the Survey of Crustal Deformation in the Shikoku Region, pp. 3-16, 1956 (in Japanese).
  18. [18] T. Sawamura, “Crustal movements by the Nankai earthquake in 1946,” Reports of the Kochi University, Natural Science, Vol.1, pp. 20-33, 1951 (in Japanese).
  19. [19] A. Shibata, “The historical documents suggesting coseismic crustal movements of the 1707 Hoei earthquake,” Hist. Earthq., No.32, pp. 1-17, 2017 (in Japanese).
  20. [20] Y. Tsuji, “Crustal movements in Shikoku due to the Ansei-Nankai earthquake of December 24, 1854,” Hist. Earthq., No.4, pp. 149-156, 1988 (in Japanese).
  21. [21] T. Usami, H. Ishii, T. Imamura, M. Takemura, and R. S. Matsu’ura, “Materials for comprehensive list of destructive earthquakes in Japan, 599–2012,” University of Tokyo Press, 2013 (in Japanese).
  22. [22] H. Maemoku, “Reexamination of coseismic uplift of Cape Muroto, southwestern Japan, using AMS14C ages of raised sessile organisms,” J. Geogr., Vol.110, No.4, pp. 479-490, 2001 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.5026/jgeography.110.4_479
  23. [23] M. Shishikura, T. Echigo, H. Maemoku, and T. Ishiyama, “Height and ages of uplifted sessile assemblage distributed along the southern coast of the Kii Peninsula, south-central Japan—Reconstruction of multi-segment earthquake history along the Nankai Trough,” Annu. Rep. Act. Fault Paleoearthq. Res., No.8, pp. 267-280, 2008 (in Japanese).
  24. [24] O. Fujiwara, K. Hirakawa, T. Irizuki, S. Hasegawa, Y. Hase, J. Uchida, and K. Abe, “Millennium-scale recurrent uplift inferred from beach deposits 50 bordering the eastern Nankai Trough, Omaezaki area, central Japan,” Isl. Arc, Vol.19, pp. 374-388, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1738.2010.00729.x
  25. [25] K. Kelson, R. C. Witter, A. Tassara, I. Ryder, C. Ledezma, G. Montalva, D. Frost, N. Sitar, R. Moss, and L. Johnson, “Coseismic tectonic surface deformation during the 2010 Maule, Chile, Mw 8.8 earthquake,” Earthq. Spectra, Vol.28, pp. 39-54, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.4000042
  26. [26] R. Grapes and G. Downes, “The 1855 Wairarapa, New Zealand earthquake—Analysis of historical data,” Bull. N. Z. Soc. Earthq. Eng., Vol.30, No.4, pp. 271-368, 1997. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.30.4.271-368
  27. [27] L. I. Burden, G. Rix, and S. Werner, “Development of a risk framework for forecasting earthquake losses in port systems,” Earthq. Spectra, Vol.32, No.1, pp. 267-284, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1193/043013eqs117m
  28. [28] C. T. Chua, T. Otake, T. Li, A. Cheng, Q. Qiu, L. Li, A. Suppasri, F. Imamura, and A. D. Switzer, “An approach to assessing tsunami risk to the global port network under rising sea levels,” NPJ Natur. Haz., Vol.1, Article No.38, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44304-024-00039-2
  29. [29] M. Takenobu, M. Miyata, A. Nozu, Y. Ohya, E. Kohama, Y. Ishino, M. Shiga, and Y. Makinae, “A case study on the judge availability of mooring facilities in the initial survey after the 2024 Noto Peninsula earthquake,” Jpn. J. JSCE, Vol.80, No.18, Article No.24-18116, 2024 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.2208/jscejj.24-18116
  30. [30] Council of Transport Policy, “Report on future comprehensive disaster prevention and mitigation measures in ports, integrating hardware and software,” 2020 (in Japanese). https://www.mlit.go.jp/common/001358650.pdf [Accessed December 11, 2024]
  31. [31] Ports and Harbours Bureau, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, “Manual for waterfront disaster prevention hubs (revised version),” 2016 (in Japanese). https://www.mlit.go.jp/common/001119729.pdf [Accessed February 4, 2025]
  32. [32] Fisheries Infrastructure Department, Fisheries Agency, “Guidelines for developing disaster resilient fisheries areas,” 2023, Partially revised in 2024 (in Japanese). https://www.jfa.maff.go.jp/j/gyoko_gyozyo/g_gideline/attach/pdf/index-185.pdf [Accessed December 11, 2024]
  33. [33] Council of Transport Policy, “Report on disaster prevention and mitigation measures for ports and harbours based on the 2024 Noto Peninsula earthquake,” 2024 (in Japanese). https://www.mlit.go.jp/policy/shingikai/content/001753495.pdf [Accessed February 13, 2025]
  34. [34] Ports and Harbours Association of Japan, “Technical Standards and Commentaries for Port and Harbour Facilities in Japan,” Ports and Harbours Association of Japan, 2018, Partially revised in 2024 (in Japanese).
  35. [35] Shizuoka Prefecture, “Report on the 4th earthquake damage estimation for Shizuoka Prefecture (2nd report),” 2013 (in Japanese). https://www.pref.shizuoka.jp/_res/projects/default_project/_page_/001/029/868/sizuokakendai4jijisinhigaisotueidainijihoukokuhoukokusyo.pdf [Accessed February 28, 2025]
  36. [36] H. Fujiwara, K. Hirata, H. Nakamura, N. Morikawa, S. Kawai, T. Maeda, T. Ohsumi, Y. Dohi, H. Matsuyama, N. Toyama, T. Kitou, K. Ohshima, Y. Murata, R. Saito, T. Shibuki, S. Akiyama, M. Korenaga, Y. Abe, N. Hashimoto, T. Hakamata, and T. Ono, “Probabilistic tsunami hazard assessment for earthquakes occurring along the Nankai Trough – Vol.1 Part I –,” Technical Note of NIED, No.439, 2020 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.24732/nied.00002257
  37. [37] Earthquake Research Committee, Headquarters for Earthquake Research Promotion, “National seismic hazard maps for Japan (2014),” 2014 (in Japanese). https://www.jishin.go.jp/evaluation/seismic_hazard_map/shm_report/shm_report_2014/ [Accessed February 28, 2025]
  38. [38] H. Matsuoka and M. Okamura, “The 2000 years ago tsunami event in the Kaniga-ike Pond innermost the Tosa Bay,” Japan Geoscience Union Meeting 2011, Poster Session SSS035-P02, 2011 (in Japanese).
  39. [39] H. Kanamori and D. L. Anderson, “Theoretical basis of some empirical relations in seismology,” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., Vol.65, No.5, pp. 1073-1095, 1975. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0650051073
  40. [40] Y. Okada, “Internal deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space,” Bull. Seismol. Soc. America, Vol.82, No.2, pp. 1018-1040, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0820021018
  41. [41] Shimizu Port Authority, “Handbook of Shimizu Port 2024,” Shimizu Port Authority, 2024 (in Japanese).
  42. [42] Central Meteorological Observatory, “Reconnaissance report on the Tonankai Earthquake of 7 December 1944,” Central Meteorological Observatory, 1945 (in Japanese).
  43. [43] Shizuoka Shimbun Digital Web, “‘Message’ Shizuoka 80 years after the war (5): Severe damage in the former Shimizu City, liquefaction, gray water gushing out. Introduction: Tonankai earthquake (5),” December 12, 2024 (in Japanese). https://news.at-s.com/article/1614630 [Accessed February 16, 2025]
  44. [44] S. Okusa, “Liquefaction potential of soils in Shimizu during earthquakes,” J. Sch. Mar. Sci.Technol., Tokai Univ., Vol.15, pp. 155-168, 1982 (in Japanese).
  45. [45] Y. Fujii, “Crustal movements in the Kanto and Tokai District, Japan with special reference to the source region of the 1944 Tonankai earthquake,” R. Sugiyama, M. Hayakawa, and M. Hoshino (Eds.), “Jishin—Jishin Gakusha to Chishitsu Gakusha to no Taiwa,” pp. 41-64, Tokai University Press, 1980 (in Japanese).
  46. [46] N. Inouchi and H. Sato, “Vertical crustal deformation accompanied with the Tonankai earthquake of 1944,” Bull. Geograph. Surv. Inst., Vol.21, No.1, pp. 10-18, 1975.
  47. [47] K. Ishibashi, “Did the rupture zone of the 1707 Hoei earthquake not extend to deep Suruga Bay?” Rep. Subcomm. Tokai Distr., Coord. Comm. Earthq. Predict., Geogr. Surv. Inst., pp. 69-78, 1977 (in Japanese).
  48. [48] Y. Akakura and K. Ono, “Analysis of the dimensions of emergency relief ships and corresponding berthing facilities after large-scale disaster—Examples of the Great East Japan Earthquake and the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake,” Technical Note of NILIM, No.942, 2017 (in Japanese).
  49. [49] Ports and Harbours Bureau, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, “Disaster prevention and mitigation measures for ports and harbours based on the 2024 Noto Peninsula earthquake,” 2024 (in Japanese). https://www.mlit.go.jp/policy/shingikai/content/001736478.pdf [Accessed February 13, 2025]
  50. [50] Omaezaki Port Authority, “Handbook of Omaezaki Port 2024,” Omaezaki Port Authority, 2024 (in Japanese).
  51. [51] Yaizu Fishing Port Authority, “Let’s go YaizuGO – Let’s explore Yaizu Fishing Port,” 2019 (in Japanese). http://doboku.pref.shizuoka.jp/desaki2/yaizu/pdf/Letsgo_YaizuGO.pdf [Accessed February 15, 2025]
  52. [52] Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, “Results of the evaluation of fisheries-related public works in 2022, post evaluation (evaluation in the period), 5. Kushimoto,” 2023 (in Japanese). https://www.jfa.maff.go.jp/j/gyosei/assess/hyouka/r4/attach/pdf/230330_2-7.pdf [Accessed February 13, 2025]
  53. [53] Kochi Prefecture, “Layout plan for disaster management hub ports,” 2013 (in Japanese). https://www.pref.kochi.lg.jp/doc/bousaikyotennkou/file_contents/file_202212224115034_1.pdf [Accessed February 13, 2025]
  54. [54] Muroto City Disaster Management Council, “Muroto City regional disaster management plan: Countermeasures against earthquake and tsunami disasters,” 2022 (in Japanese). https://www.city.muroto.kochi.jp/pbfile/m000285/pbf20220721112745.pdf [Accessed March 6, 2025]
  55. [55] S. Akagi, T. Maeda, Y. Dohi, H. Nakamura, K. Seki, and H. Fujiwara, “Tsunami propagation and run-up calculations for tsunami risk assessment considering the variety of the great earthquakes along the Nankai Trough,” Proc. of the 16th Japan Earthquake Engineering Symp., Presentation Day3-G414-05, 2023 (in Japanese).

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Sep. 30, 2025