single-dr.php

JDR Vol.19 No.5 pp. 717-725
(2024)
doi: 10.20965/jdr.2024.p0717

Paper:

Difference of Soil Thickness Depending on Climate Zones and Geological Classification: Based on a Survey of Mountain Slopes in Japan

Hiromi Akita ORCID Icon

National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Resilience
3-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0006, Japan

Corresponding author

Received:
March 22, 2024
Accepted:
September 2, 2024
Published:
October 1, 2024
Keywords:
soil thickness, climate zone, geological classification, probability density function, handy penetration test
Abstract

There is little information which examines and compares climate zones or geology/topography in their relation to soil thickness along mountain slopes, where soil thickness is a possible contributing factor for the increase of sediment wash-off. In this study, the data obtained from handy penetration tests conducted throughout Japan are collected and attached to information on climate zones and geography/topography with the aim of clarifying the difference in soil thickness according to the climate zone and geological classification. The probability distribution of soil thickness was found to fit roughly with the probability density function of a log-normal distribution, regardless of the climate zone or geological age / lithology. A comparison of μ showed that the soil thickness at target sites in the Pacific climate zone, which have high rainfall, was large, at approximately 2.1 m. Meanwhile, the soil thickness was low, at approximately 1.5 m, at target sites in the Setouchi climate zone, which has low rainfall. A comparison of the geology showed that soil thicknesses of sites where the geology consisted of Tertiary and Quaternary sedimentary rocks were high, at approximately 2.1 m and 2.3 m, respectively. This suggests that, in high-precipitation regions, the weathering of rocks is promoted so that the soil layers tend to increase in thickness.

Cite this article as:
H. Akita, “Difference of Soil Thickness Depending on Climate Zones and Geological Classification: Based on a Survey of Mountain Slopes in Japan,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.19 No.5, pp. 717-725, 2024.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] T. Takahashi, “Debris Flow: Mechanics, Prediction and Countermeasures,” T&F Books UK, 2009.
  2. [2] Disaster Prevention Research Institute, “Northern Kyushu heavy rain 2017,” Kyoto University, 2018.
  3. [3] Disaster Prevention Research Institute, “Heavy rain of July, 2018,” Disaster Research Report, Kyoto University, 2019.
  4. [4] O. Osaka, T. Tamura, J. Kubota, and Y. Tsukamoto, “Process study of the soil stratification on weathered granite slopes,” J. of the Japan Society of Erosion Control Engineering, Vol.45, Issue 3, pp. 3-12, 1996 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.11475/sabo1973.45.3_3
  5. [5] M. Chigira, “Weathering and Slope Movement,” Kinmiraisya, 2005 (in Japanese).
  6. [6] E. E. Small, R. S. Anderson, and G. S. Hancock, “Estimates of the rate of regolith production using 10Be and 26Al from an alpine hillslope,” Geomorphology, Vol.27, Issues 1-2, pp. 131-150, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-555X(98)00094-4
  7. [7] J. J. Owen, R. Amundson, W. E. Dietrich, K. Nishiizumi, B. Sutter, and G. Chong, “The sensitivity of hillslope bedrock erosion to precipitation,” Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, Vol.36, Issue 1, pp. 117-135, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.2083
  8. [8] A. M. Heimsath, R. A. DiBiase, and K. X. Whipple, “Soil production limits and the transition to bedrock-dominated landscapes,” Nature Geoscience, Vol.5, No.3, pp. 210-214, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1380
  9. [9] M. Arjun, A. M. Heimsath, E. William, W. E. Dietrich, K. Nishiizumi, and R. C. Finkel, “The soil production function and landscape equilibrium,” Nature, Vol.388, No.6640, pp. 358-361, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1038/41056
  10. [10] M. Arjun, A. M. Heimsath, E. William, W. E. Dietrich, K. Nishiizumi, and R. C. Finkel, “Stochastic processes of soil production and transport: Erosion rates, topographic variation and cosmogenic nuclides in the Oregon Coast Range,” Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, Vol.26, Issue 5, pp. 531-552, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.209
  11. [11] O. Osaka and Y. Tsukamoto, “A preliminary study on critical soil depths on forested slopes,” Greening Technology, Vol.12, Issue 3, pp. 1-6, 1987.
  12. [12] S. Okubo and T. Kamisaka, “Geotechnical survey by handy dynamic cone penetrometer,” Civil Engineering J., Vol.13, No.2, pp. 83-87, 1971.
  13. [13] National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management, “Survey on river erosion control standards and reference materials,” Technical Note of NILIM, No.712, 2013.
  14. [14] T. Wakatsuki, Y. Sasaki, Y. Tanaka, and Y. Matsukura, “Predictive equation of unit weights, shear–strength parameters and permeability of grus using by simplified dynamic cone penetrometer hardness and grain size,” J. of the Japan Society of Erosion Control Engineering, Vol.59, No.6, pp. 38-46, 2007 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.11475/sabo1973.59.6_38
  15. [15] T. Iida and K. Tanaka, “The relationship between topography and soil depth measured with the portable penetration test apparatus,” Japanese Geomorphological Union, Vol.18, No.1, pp. 61-78, 1997 (in Japanese).
  16. [16] Public Works Research Institute, “Evaluation of risk of debris flow caused by surface landslides Manual (draft),” Technical Memorandum of PWRI, No.4129, 2009.
  17. [17] T. Uchida, N. Mori, K. Tamura, H. Terada, S. Takiguchi, and K. Kamee, “The role of data preparation on shallow landslide prediction,” J. of the Japan Society of Erosion Control Engineering, Vol.62, Issue 1, pp. 23-31, 2009 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.11475/sabo.62.1_23
  18. [18] S. Hiramatsu, T. Mizuyama, and S. Okuyama, “Influences of primary factors determing failures on natural mountain slopes by a landslides simulation model,” J. of the Japan Society of Erosion Control Engineering, Vol.43, Issue 5, pp. 11-18, 1991 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.11475/sabo1973.43.5_11
  19. [19] T. Sekiguchi, “Climate classification of Japan“ Tokyo University of Education Geography Research Report, 1950 (in Japanese).
  20. [20] National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management, “Research on a method of estimating the potential depth of slope failure using a knocking pole test,” Technical Note of NILIM, No.261, 2005.
  21. [21] Geological Survey of Japan, AIST, “1:200,000 seamless geological map of Japan.” https://gbank.gsj.jp/seamless/maps.html [Accessed February 29, 2024]
  22. [22] D. G. Tarboton, “A new method for the determination of flow directions and upslope areas in grid digital elevation models,” Water Resources Research, Vol.33, Issue 2, pp. 309-319, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1029/96WR03137
  23. [23] K. J. Beven and M. J. Kirkby, “A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology,” Hydrological Sciences Bulletin, Vol.24, pp. 43-69, 1979. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667909491834
  24. [24] P. F. Quinn, K. J. Beven, and R. Lamb, “The ln(a/tan/β) index: how to calculate it and how to use it in the TOP MODEL framework,” Hydrological Processes, Vol.9, No.42, pp. 161-182, 1995.
  25. [25] I. D. Moore, R. B. Grayson, and A. R. Landson, “Digital terrain modeling: a review of hydrological and ecological applications,” Hydrological Processes, Vol.5, pp. 3-30, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.3360050103
  26. [26] R. Lang, “Verwitterung und Bodenbildung als Einführung in die Bodenkunde,” pp. 25-28, Schweizerbart Science Publishers, 1920 (in German).

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Oct. 11, 2024