single-dr.php

JDR Vol.19 No.2 pp. 359-369
(2024)
doi: 10.20965/jdr.2024.p0359

Paper:

Visitors’ Attitudes Toward the Expansion of Alternative Shuttle Bus System in Shiretoko National Park

Tetsuya Aikoh*,† ORCID Icon, Satoshi Yahiro**, Yasushi Shoji* ORCID Icon, and Hyerin Kim* ORCID Icon

*Research Faculty of Agriculture, Hokkaido University
Kita 9, Nishi 9, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-8589, Japan

Corresponding author

**Chugoku-Shikoku Regional Environment Office, Ministry of the Environment
Okayama, Japan

Received:
October 5, 2023
Accepted:
December 6, 2023
Published:
April 1, 2024
Keywords:
World Natural Heritage, alternative transportation, shuttle bus, choice experiment, visitor attitude
Abstract

In some natural parks, introducing a shuttle bus system as an alternative to private cars can help reduce congestion and protect nature. This study examines the pilot program to effectively induce visitors to switch to the shuttle bus, while examining the visitors’ understanding of the expansion of the restricted vehicle section in Shiretoko National Park—a World Natural Heritage site known for its rich natural resources, especially as a high-density habitat for brown bears. There are concerns about conflicts between visitors and brown bears that appear along roads. Visitor restrictions, such as limited access to transportation, limit the use of a place and alter the behavior and experience. Therefore, careful consideration is needed before introducing visitor restrictions. The results of our questionnaire survey of visitors indicated that most favored the expansion of the shuttle bus section. The choice experiment revealed that the guides on the bus and an optional experience encouraged visitors to switch to the shuttle buses. Nonetheless, awareness of the pilot program was low, and some visitors preferred their cars, indicating the need for further promotion of awareness and understanding of these new measures.

Cite this article as:
T. Aikoh, S. Yahiro, Y. Shoji, and H. Kim, “Visitors’ Attitudes Toward the Expansion of Alternative Shuttle Bus System in Shiretoko National Park,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.19 No.2, pp. 359-369, 2024.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] B. Shindler and B. Shelby, “Regulating wilderness use: An investigation of user group support,” J. For., Vol.91, No.2, pp. 41-44, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1093/jof/91.2.41
  2. [2] P. F. J. Eagles and S. F. McCool, “Tourism in National Parks and Protected Areas: Planning and Management,” CABI Publishing, 2002.
  3. [3] S. Mitsui and T. Kubo, “Visitors’ evaluation of management rules in Amami Oshima ‘Kinsakubaru Native Forest’: Application of best-worst scaling,” J. For. Econ., Vol.64, No.3, pp. 1-7, 2018 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.20818/jfe.64.3_1
  4. [4] T. Aikoh and S. Asakawa, “Mountaineer’s acceptable limits of human encounters and manners, and their coping behavior,” J. Jpn. Inst. Landsc. Archit., Vol.63, No.5, pp. 619-624, 2000 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.5632/jila.63.619
  5. [5] R. E. Manning and L. E. Anderson, “Managing Outdoor Recreation: Case Studies in the National Parks,” CABI Publishing, 2012.
  6. [6] K. Furuya, M. Yui, M. Akasaka, M. Tada, and T. Ohata, “Various problems of use under traffic control at Oze Area in Nikko National Park,” Tech. Bull. Fac. Hortic. Chiba Univ., Vol.55, pp. 21-41, 2001 (in Japanese).
  7. [7] B. L. Mace, J. D. Marquit, and S. C. Bates, “Visitor assessment of the mandatory alternative transportation system at Zion National Park,” Environ. Manage., Vol.52, No.5, pp. 1271-1285, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-013-0164-z
  8. [8] Natural Parks Foundation (Ed.), “Natural Parks Handbook,” 2022 (in Japanese).
  9. [9] Y. Honma and K. Meguro, “Traffic impacts of on-street parking cars on secondary north-south streets in downtown Yangon,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.15, No.4, pp. 520-529, 2020. https://doi.org/10.20965/jdr.2020.p0520
  10. [10] A. Kobayashi, “Visitors’ attitude under traffic control in Shiretoko National Park,” J. Jpn. Inst. Landsc. Archit., Vol.63, No.5, pp. 613-618, 2000 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.5632/jila.63.613
  11. [11] A. Kobayashi, “Visitors’ attitude toward traffic control systems – Shiretoko and Daisetsuzan National Park,” J. Environ. Sci. Lab., Vol.10, pp. 1-12, 2003 (in Japanese).
  12. [12] D. D. White, “An interpretive study of Yosemite National Park visitors’ perspectives toward alternative transportation in Yosemite Valley,” Environ. Manag., Vol.39, No.1, pp. 50-62, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-006-0061-9
  13. [13] D. D. White, J. F. Aquino, M. Budruk, and A. Golub, “Visitors’ experiences of traditional and alternative transportation in Yosemite National Park,” J. Park Recreat. Adm., Vol.29, No.1, pp. 38-57, 2011.
  14. [14] Y. Shiftan, D. Vary, and D. Geyer, “Demand for park shuttle services – A stated-preference approach,” J. Transp. Geogr., Vol.14, No.1, pp. 52-59, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2004.12.005
  15. [15] D. Pettebone et al., “Estimating visitors’ travel mode choices along the Bear Lake Road in Rocky Mountain National Park,” J. Transp. Geogr., Vol.19, No.6, pp. 1210-1221, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.05.002
  16. [16] F. Orsi and D. Geneletti, “Assessing the effects of access policies on travel mode choices in an Alpine tourist destination,” J. Transp. Geogr., Vol.39, pp. 21-35, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.06.015
  17. [17] A. Scuttari, F. Orsi, and R. Bassani, “Assessing the tourism-traffic paradox in mountain destinations. A stated preference survey on the Dolomites’ passes (Italy),” J. Sustain. Tour., Vol.27, No.2, pp. 241-257, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2018.1428336
  18. [18] R. M. González, C. Román, and J. D. Ortúzar, “Preferences for sustainable mobility in natural areas: The case of Teide National Park,” J. Transp. Geogr., Vol.76, pp. 42-51, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.03.002
  19. [19] T. Mieno, Y. Shoji, T. Aikoh, A. Arnberger, and R. Eder, “Heterogeneous preferences for social trail use in the urban forest: A latent class model,” Urban For. Urban Green., Vol.19, pp. 20-28, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.06.016
  20. [20] Kushiro Nature Conservation Office of Ministry of the Environment, Hokkaido Regional Forest Office of Forest Agency, and Hokkaido Government, “Shiretoko White Paper in FY 2021” (in Japanese). https://shiretokodata-center.env.go.jp/data/research/annual_report/R3annual_report.pdf [Accessed October 1, 2023]
  21. [21] T. Aikoh, Y. Shoji, T. Tsuge, S. Shibasaki, and K. Yamamoto, “Application of the double-bounded dichotomous choice model to the estimation of crowding acceptability in natural recreation areas,” J. Outdoor Recreat. Tour., Vol.32, Article No.100195, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2018.10.006
  22. [22] J. Huber and Z. Zwerina, “The importance of utility balance in efficient choice designs,” J. Mark. Res., Vol.33, No.3, pp. 307-317, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379603300305
  23. [23] D. McFadden, “Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior,” P. Zarembka (Ed.), “Frontiers in Econometrics,” pp. 105-142, Academic Press, 1973.
  24. [24] M. Ben-Akiva and S. R. Lerman, “Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand,” MIT Press, 1985.
  25. [25] Y. Shoji et al., “Understanding preferences for pricing policies in Japan’s national parks using the best–worst scaling method,” J. Nat. Conserv., Vol.60, Article No.125954, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2021.125954
  26. [26] T. Kubo and Y. Shoji, “Demand for bear viewing hikes: Implications for balancing visitor satisfaction with safety in protected areas,” J. Outdoor Recreat. Tour., Vol.16, pp. 44-49, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2016.09.004
  27. [27] Y. Shoji and T. Tsuge, “Heterogeneous preferences for winter nature-based tours in sub-frigid climate zones: A latent class approach,” Tour. Econ., Vol.21, No.2, pp. 387-407, 2015. https://doi.org/10.5367/te.2013.0350
  28. [28] J. Swait, “A structural equation model of latent segmentation and product choice for cross-sectional revealed preference choice data,” J. Retail. Consum. Serv., Vol.1, No.2, pp. 77-89, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1016/0969-6989(94)90002-7
  29. [29] P. C. Boxall and W. L. Adamowicz, “Understanding heterogeneous preferences in random utility models: A latent class approach,” Environ. Resour. Econ., Vol.23, No.4, pp. 421-446, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021351721619
  30. [30] M. Bech and D. Gyrd-Hansen, “Effects coding in discrete choice experiments,” Health Econ., Vol.14, No.10, pp. 1079-1083, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.984
  31. [31] R. Scarpa and M. Thiene, “Destination choice models for rock climbing in the Northeastern Alps: A latent-class approach based on intensity of preferences,” Land Econ., Vol.81, No.3, pp. 426-444, 2005.
  32. [32] S. Hynes, N. Hanley, and R. Scarpa, “Effects on welfare measures of alternative means of accounting for preference heterogeneity in recreational demand models,” Am. J. Agric. Econ., Vol.90, No.4, pp. 1011-1027, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01148.x
  33. [33] J. J. Louviere, D. A. Hensher, and J. D. Swait, “Stated choice methods: analysis and applications,” Cambridge University Press., 2000. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511753831
  34. [34] D. Taff et al., “Dimensions of alternative transportation experience in Yosemite and Rocky Mountain National Parks,” J. Transp. Geogr., Vol.30, pp. 37-46, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.02.010
  35. [35] J. N. Newton et al., “If I can find a parking spot: A stated choice approach to Grand Teton National Park visitors’ transportation preferences,” J. Outdoor Recreat. Tour., Vol.32, Article No.100172, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2018.04.001

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Apr. 05, 2024