single-dr.php

JDR Vol.19 No.2 pp. 268-278
(2024)
doi: 10.20965/jdr.2024.p0268

Paper:

Evaluation of Tsunami Evacuation Plans for an Underground Mall Using an Agent-Based Model

Akira Takahashi ORCID Icon and Kensuke Yasufuku ORCID Icon

Cybermedia Center, Osaka University
5-1 Mihogaoka, Ibaraki, Osaka 567-0047, Japan

Corresponding author

Received:
September 28, 2023
Accepted:
December 5, 2023
Published:
April 1, 2024
Keywords:
evacuation plan, agent-based model, simulation, tsunami, underground mall
Abstract

Tsunamis resulting from earthquakes can cause extensive damage, including infrastructure destruction, injuries, and fatalities. To address these risks, numerous tsunami evacuation simulations have been conducted to assess evacuation strategies and identify issues, particularly in Japan, where the Nankai Trough earthquake is anticipated, affecting underground malls in urban areas. Our previous research primarily focused on evacuating from underground to the surface, neglecting surface evacuation. Therefore, this study extended the previous study to include horizontal evacuation following the exit from the underground mall to ground level. It also considered the impact of pedestrian road crossings as interactions with vehicular traffic within the simulation to enhance realism and verify the evacuation risk. The study also explores scenarios where evacuation guide stairs are unavailable, comparing the effectiveness of alternative staircases in the evacuation plan. Results indicate that while using alternative staircases temporarily increases the number of evacuees reaching the surface, road crossings on evacuation routes become significant bottlenecks, leading to surface congestion and delayed evacuations. This raises doubts about the effectiveness of alternative staircases and highlights the need to consider alternative evacuation routes as a secondary plan. Additionally, the study reveals that reduced pedestrian flow at road crossings can significantly impact on evacuation times. Ultimately, this study demonstrated that achieving a short evacuation time from underground malls to the ground level might not always yield the best evacuation plan. It underscored the importance of considering aboveground factors in evacuation planning to ensure safety in the event of a tsunami caused by an earthquake.

Cite this article as:
A. Takahashi and K. Yasufuku, “Evaluation of Tsunami Evacuation Plans for an Underground Mall Using an Agent-Based Model,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.19 No.2, pp. 268-278, 2024.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] V. K. Gusiakov, P. K. Dunbar, and N. Arcos, “Twenty-five years (1992–2016) of global tsunamis: Statistical and analytical overview,” Pure Appl. Geophys., Vol.176, No.7, pp. 2795-2807, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-019-02113-7
  2. [2] Reconstruction Agency, “Status of reconstruction from the Great East Japan Earthquake and its initiatives,” 2022 (in Japanese). https://www.reconstruction.go.jp/topics/main-cat1/sub-cat1-1/202212_pamphlet_fukko-jokyo-torikumi.pdf [Accessed September 20, 2023]
  3. [3] F. Makinoshima, F. Imamura, and Y. Oishi, “Tsunami evacuation processes based on human behaviour in past earthquakes and tsunamis: A literature review,” Prog. Disaster Sci., Vol.7, Article No.100113, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100113
  4. [4] Y. Sun, K. Yamori, and S. Kondo, “Disaster education based on community of practice – A case study in Okitsu, Kochi Prefecture,” J. Integr. Disaster Risk Manag., Vol.3, No.1, pp. 92-106, 2013. https://doi.org/10.5595/idrim.2013.0056
  5. [5] K. Watanabe and A. Kondo, “Development of tsunami evacuation simulation model to support community planning for tsunami disaster mitigation,” J. Archit. Plan., Vol.74, No.637, pp. 627-634, 2009 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.3130/aija.74.627
  6. [6] K. Hirano, Y. Fukushima, H. Maruya, M. Kido, and M. Sugiura, “The anticipated Nankai Trough earthquake and tsunami in Japan: Determinant factors of residents’ pre-event evacuation intentions,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.18, No.3, pp. 233-245, 2023. https://doi.org/10.20965/jdr.2023.p0233
  7. [7] Y. Goto et al., “Tsunami evacuation simulation for disaster education and city planning,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.7, No.1, pp. 92-101, 2012. https://doi.org/10.20965/jdr.2012.p0092
  8. [8] K. Yamori and T. Sugiyama, “Development and social implementation of smartphone app Nige-Tore for improving tsunami evacuation drills: Synergistic effects between commitment and contingency,” Int. J. Disaster Risk Sci., Vol.11, No.6, pp. 751-761, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-020-00319-1
  9. [9] M. Xie, M. Murata, and Y. Muraki, “Tsunami evacuation guidance simulation using multi-agent systems based on OpenStreetMap,” Int. J. Environ. Sci., Vol.2, pp. 231-237, 2017.
  10. [10] F. Usman, K. Murakami, A. D. Wicaksono, and E. Setiawan, “Application of agent-based model simulation for tsunami evacuation in Pacitan, Indonesia,” MATEC Web Conf., Vol.97, Article No.01064, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20179701064
  11. [11] J. Kim, T. Takabatake, I. Nistor, and T. Shibayama, “A comparison between agent-based and GIS-based tsunami evacuation simulations: A case study for Tofino, BC,” Can. J. Civ. Eng., Vol.49, No.4, pp. 511-526, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2020-0660
  12. [12] T. Katada and N. Kuwasawa, “Development of tsunami comprehensive scenario simulator for risk management and disaster education,” Trans. Jpn. Soc. Civ. Eng. D, Vol.62, No.3, pp. 250-261, 2006 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.2208/jscejd.62.250
  13. [13] P. González-Riancho et al., “Tsunami evacuation modelling as a tool for risk reduction: Application to the coastal area of El Salvador,” Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., Vol.13, No.12, pp. 3249-3270, 2013. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-3249-2013
  14. [14] S. Kubisch et al., “The contribution of tsunami evacuation analysis to evacuation planning in Chile: Applying a multi-perspective research design,” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., Vol.45, Article No.101462, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101462
  15. [15] E. Mas et al., “Recent advances in agent-based tsunami evacuation simulations: Case studies in Indonesia, Thailand, Japan and Peru,” Pure Appl. Geophys., Vol.172, No.12, pp. 3409-3424, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-015-1105-y
  16. [16] M. Fujioka, K. Ishibashi, H. Kaji, and I. Tsukagoshi, “Multi agent simulation model for evaluating evacuation management system against tsunami disaster,” J. Archit. Plan., Vol.67, No.562, pp. 231-236, 2002 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.3130/aija.67.231_4
  17. [17] K. Munadi, Y. Nurdin, N. Nasaruddin, M. Dirhamsyah, and S. Muchalil, “Multiagent based tsunami evacuation simulation: A conceptual model,” Proc. of 2nd Annual Int. Conf. Syiah University 2012 & 8th IMT-GT Uninet Biosciences Conf., Vol.2, pp. 254-259, 2012.
  18. [18] H. Wang, A. Mostafizi, L. A. Cramer, D. Cox, and H. Park, “An agent-based model of a multimodal near-field tsunami evacuation: Decision-making and life safety,” Transp. Res. C: Emerg. Technol., Vol.64, pp. 86-100, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2015.11.010
  19. [19] K. Nabeyama et al., “Tsunami evacuation simulation considering road width in Aoshima district,” Artif. Life Robot., Vol.28, No.4, pp. 779-788, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-023-00888-6
  20. [20] T. Saito and H. Kagami, “Simulation of evacuation behabior from tsunami utilizing multiagent system: A case study of Aonae, Okushiri Island,” J. Archit. Plan., Vol.70, No.597, pp. 229-234, 2005 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.3130/aija.70.229_6
  21. [21] M. L. L. Wijerathne, L. A. Melgar, M. Hori, T. Ichimura, and S. Tanaka, “HPC enhanced large urban area evacuation simulations with vision based autonomously navigating multi agents,” Procedia Comput. Sci., Vol.18, pp. 1515-1524, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.05.319
  22. [22] E. Mas, A. Suppasri, F. Imamura, and S. Koshimura, “Agent-based simulation of the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake / Tsunami evacuation: An integrated model of tsunami inundation and evacuation,” J. Nat. Disaster Sci., Vol.34, No.1, pp. 41-57, 2012. https://doi.org/10.2328/jnds.34.41
  23. [23] H. Takagi, E. Mas, and S. Koshimura, “Analysis of the evacuation behavior in Natori, Yuriage during the Great East Japan Earthquake Tsunami,” Annual Meeting of the Tohoku Branch Technology Research Conf., Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Vol.3, pp. 2011-2012, 2014.
  24. [24] A. Takahashi, K. Yasufuku, and H. Abe, “Evaluation of evacuation guidance plan for large-scale underground mall at the time of flooding using the simulation,” J. Archit. Plan., Vol.86, No.786, pp. 2104-2114, 2021 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.3130/aija.86.2104
  25. [25] P. Murray-Tuite, “Perspectives for network management in response to unplanned disruptions,” J. Urban Plan. Dev., Vol.133, No.1, pp. 9-17, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2007)133:1(9)
  26. [26] A. Mostafizi, H. Wang, D. Cox, L. A. Cramer, and S. Dong, “Agent-based tsunami evacuation modeling of unplanned network disruptions for evidence-driven resource allocation and retrofitting strategies,” Nat. Hazards, Vol.88, No.3, pp. 1347-1372, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-2927-y
  27. [27] Japan Institute of Country-ology and Engineering (JICE), “Knowing the Land /Surprisingly Unknown Land of Japan” (in Japanese). http://www.jice.or.jp/knowledge/japan/commentary12 [Accessed September 30, 2023]
  28. [28] Japan Meteorological Agency, “Estimated seismic intensity and tsunami height from a Nankai Trough earthquake” (in Japanese). https://www.data.jma.go.jp/svd/eqev/data/nteq/assumption.html [Accessed September 30, 2023]
  29. [29] Osaka City Underground Flooding Prevention Council, “Osaka City Underground Flooding Prevention Guidelines,” 2018 (in Japanese).
  30. [30] Osaka City Underground Flooding Prevention Council, “Flooding Prevention Plan for Underground Spaces around Osaka Station,” Ver.1, 2016 (in Japanese).
  31. [31] Thunderhead Engineering, “Pathfinder User Manual,” Version 2022-3, 2022. https://support.thunderheadeng.com/docs/pathfinder/2022-3/user-manual/ [Accessed September 20, 2023]
  32. [32] Geospatial Information Authority of Japan (in Japanese). https://www.gsi.go.jp/kiban/index.html [Accessed February 1, 2023]
  33. [33] J. Yoshida and K. Fujioka, “A study on pedestrian traffic analysis considering the diversification of pedestrian attributes,” The Urban Infrastructure and Technology Promotion Council, 27th Technical Research Presentation, Vol.206, 2015 (in Japanese).
  34. [34] Ministry of Construction, “Ministry of Construction Notification,” Nos.1441-1-1441-4, 2000 (in Japanese).
  35. [35] M. Yamamoto and H. Yoshimura, “Quantitative characteristics of one way crowd flow on the stairs railway stations,” J. Archit. Plan., Vol.79, No.701, pp. 1515-1521, 2014 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.3130/aija.79.1515
  36. [36] Z. Wang and G. Jia, “A novel agent-based model for tsunami evacuation simulation and risk assessment,” Nat. Hazards, Vol.105, No.2, pp. 2045-2071, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04389-8
  37. [37] A. A. Taflanidis, G. Jia, and I. Gidaris, “Natural hazard probabilistic risk assessment through surrogate modeling,” P. Gardoni and J. M. LaFave (Eds.), “Multi-Hazard Approaches to Civil Infrastructure Engineering,” pp. 59-86, Springer, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29713-2_4
  38. [38] H. C. M. Vorst, “Evacuation models and disaster psychology,” Procedia Eng., Vol.3, pp. 15-21, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2010.07.004
  39. [39] J. Lin, R. Zhu, N. Li, and B. Becerik-Gerber, “Do people follow the crowd in building emergency evacuation? A cross-cultural immersive virtual reality-based study,” Adv. Eng. Inform., Vol.43, Article No.101040, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2020.101040
  40. [40] T. Ezaki, D. Yanagisawa, and K. Nishinari, “Pedestrian flow through multiple bottlenecks,” Physical Review E. Vol.86, No.2, Article No.026118, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.86.026118

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Apr. 05, 2024