JDR Vol.17 No.6 pp. 853-860
doi: 10.20965/jdr.2022.p0853


Industrial Area Business Continuity Management Exercise: An Experimental Validation for Flood in Thailand

Akira Kodaka*1, Natt Leelawat*2,*3,†, Kenji Watanabe*4, Jaehyun Park*5, Jing Tang*3,*6, Eri Ino*4, and Naohiko Kohtake*1

*1Graduate School of System Design and Management, Keio University
Collaboration Complex, 4-1-1 Hiyoshi, Kohoku-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 223-8526, Japan

*2Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand

Corresponding author

*3Disaster and Risk Management Information Systems Research Unit, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Japan

*4Department of Architecture, Civil Engineering and Industrial Management Engineering, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Nagoya, Japan

*5Faculty of Design and Architecture, Kyoto Institute of Technology, Kyoto, Japan

*6International School of Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand

March 14, 2022
September 2, 2022
October 1, 2022
Business continuity management, Business continuity plan, industrial complex, Industrial Area BCM, flood

In the event of a crisis, companies in industrial complexes and surrounding regional organizations that share production bases and operating resources need to manage business continuity through coordinated mutual cooperation in public and private sectors, in addition to their individual business continuity plans (BCPs). This framework of collaboration is called area business continuity management (Area BCM). This note proposes and validates a participatory exercise which contributes to formulate Industrial Area BCM based on a series of studies conducted in the project called Science and Technology Research Partnership for Sustainable Development (SATREPS) targeting industrial complexes in Phra Nakhon Si Ayutthaya Province, Thailand. The proposed exercise for enhancing the effectiveness of individual company BCPs through Industrial Area BCM has the following three functions: 1) provision of reliable and objective information to support rational decision-making by individual companies, 2) identification of factors affecting the decision-making and response of stakeholders that prevent the BCPs of individual companies from planned operations, and 3) development of complementary indicators consists of coordination and collaboration with regional stakeholders to improve the effectiveness of individual BCP.

Cite this article as:
A. Kodaka, N. Leelawat, K. Watanabe, J. Park, J. Tang, E. Ino, and N. Kohtake, “Industrial Area Business Continuity Management Exercise: An Experimental Validation for Flood in Thailand,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.17, No.6, pp. 853-860, 2022.
Data files:
  1. [1] H. Baba et al., “Introductory study on Disaster Risk Assessment and Area Business Continuity Planning in industry agglomerated areas in the ASEAN,” IDRiM J., Vol.3, No.2, pp. 184-195, doi: 10.5595/idrim.2013.0069, 2013.
  2. [2] K. Charoenthammachoke et al., “Business Continuity Management: A Preliminary Systematic Literature Review Based on ScienceDirect Database,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.15, No.5, pp. 546-555, doi: 10.20965/jdr.2020.p0546, 2020.
  3. [3] K. Watanabe, “Business Continuity Management (BCM) for Regional Financial Functionalities in Wide-Area Disasters Importance and Challenges in Cooperation Among Regional Financial Institutions and PPP (Public-Private Partnership),” J. Disaster Res., Vol.10, No.sp, pp. 777-782, doi: 10.20965/jdr.2015.p0777, 2015.
  4. [4] C. Isouchi et al., “Formulate Guidelines for District Continuity Plans (DCP) for the Event of a Large-Scale Flood Disaster and Utilization of the Community Disaster Management Plan (CDMP),” J. of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. F6 (Safety Problem), Vol.70, No.2, pp. I_31-I_36, doi: 10.2208/jscejsp.70.I_31, 2014 (in Japanese).
  5. [5] S. Visessri and C. Ekkawatpanit, “Flood Management in the Context of Climate and Land-Use Changes and Adaptation Within the Chao Phraya River Basin,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.15, No.5, pp. 579-587, doi: 10.20965/jdr.2020.p0579, 2020.
  6. [6] S. P. C. et al., “Assessing Flood Risk of the Chao Phraya River Basin Based on Statistical Rainfall Analysis,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.15, No.7, pp. 1025-1039, doi: 10.20965/jdr.2020.p1025, 2020.
  7. [7] T. Sayama et al., “Rainfall-runoff-inundation analysis of the 2010 Pakistan flood in the Kabul River basin,” Hydrological Sciences J., Vol.57, No.2, pp. 298-312, doi: 10.1080/02626667.2011.644245, 2012.
  8. [8] T. Nakasu et al., “Measuring Capacities and Protecting Communities: Strengthening Regional Resilience in the Flooded Industrial Area in Thailand,” Int. J. of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, Vol.13, No.2, pp. 163-179, doi: 10.1108/IJDRBE-08-2021-0120, 2022.
  9. [9] T. Nakasu et al., “Social Vulnerability Changes and Sustainable Development in the Flooded Industrial Complex Area,” Proc. of the 2nd Int. Conf. on Humanities (ICH 2019), pp. 239-257, doi: 10.15405/epsbs.2020.10.02.23, 2020.
  10. [10] R. Bhula-or et al., “Households’ Evacuation Decisions in Response to the 2011 Flood in Thailand,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.15, No.5, pp. 599-608, doi: 10.20965/jdr.2020.p0599, 2020.
  11. [11] N. Leelawat, “Preference for Information During Flood Disasters: A Study of Thailand and Indonesia,” B. McLellan (Eds.), “Sustainable Future for Human Security: Society, Cities and Governance,” pp. 335-349, Springer, doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-5433-4_23, 2018.
  12. [12] K. Prathumchai and R. Bhula-or, “Understanding Households’ Perceptions of Risk Communication During a Natural Disaster: A Case Study of the 2011 Flood in Thailand,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.15, No.5, pp. 621-631, doi: 10.20965/jdr.2020.p0621, 2020.
  13. [13] S. Sapapthai et al., “A Stakeholder Analysis Approach for Area Business Continuity Management: A Systematic Review,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.15, No.5, pp. 588-598, doi: 10.20965/jdr.2020.p0588, 2020.
  14. [14] A. Kodaka et al., “The Impact of Employee Behavior on Business Continuity at an Industrial Complex,” Proc. of 2021 IEEE Int. Symp. on Systems Engineering (ISSE), 6pp., doi: 10.1109/ISSE51541.2021.9582516, 2021.
  15. [15] K. Meechang et al., “Affecting factors on perceived usefulness of area-business continuity management: A perspective from employees in industrial areas in Thailand,” IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Vol.630, Article No.012016, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/630/1/012016, 2021.
  16. [16] A. Kodaka et al., “A Dependent Activities Elicitation Method for Designing Area Business Continuity Management,” Proc. of 2020 IEEE Int. Symp. on Systems Engineering (ISSE), 6pp., doi: 10.1109/ISSE49799.2020.9272221, 2020.
  17. [17] S. Sapapthai, “Success Factors of Business Continuity Management Implementation Using Analytic Hierarchy Process – A case study of an automotive part company in Ayutthaya Province, Thailand,” Proc. of 2021 3rd Int. Conf. on Management Science and Industrial Engineering (MSIE 2021), pp. 132-138, doi: 10.1145/3460824.3460845, 2021.
  18. [18] T. Kitbumroong et al., “Area-Business Continuity Management: A Case Study of Construction Material Company,” Proc. of IE Network 2019, pp. 324-328, 2019 (in Thai).

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Dec. 01, 2022