Top > JDR > Magnetization Structure and its Temporal Change of Miyakejima ...

single-dr.php

JDR Vol.17 No.5 pp. 644-653
(2022)
doi: 10.20965/jdr.2022.p0644

Paper:

Views over last 60 days: 336

Magnetization Structure and its Temporal Change of Miyakejima Volcano, Japan, Revealed by Uncrewed Aerial Vehicle Aeromagnetic Survey

Takao Koyama*,†, Takayuki Kaneko*, Takao Ohminato*, Atsushi Watanabe*, Yoshiaki Honda**, Takahiro Akiyama*, Shinichi Tanaka*, Marceau Gresse*, Makoto Uyeshima*, and Yuichi Morita*,***

*Earthquake Research Institute, The University of Tokyo
1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0032, Japan

†Corresponding author

**Center for Environmental Remote Sensing, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan

***National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Resilience (NIED), Tsukuba, Japan

Received:
January 15, 2022
Accepted:
June 1, 2022
Published:
August 1, 2022
Creative Commons License
Keywords:
aeromagnetic survey, Miyakejima, magnetization intensity model, multirotor drone, uncrewed helicopter
Abstract

Miyakejima volcano experienced its latest eruption in 2000 with the summit subsidence, and the next event is expected in the near future. An aeromagnetic survey in Miyakejima was conducted in March 2021 in order to investigate the current state of its magnetization structure to identify the potential for another eruption and, thus, mitigate volcanic disaster. The survey flight was conducted using an uncrewed aerial vehicle (UAV), a multirotor drone, to deploy a scalar magnetometer. After processing geomagnetic field data from this survey, in combination with data from previous surveys conducted by using another UAV, an uncrewed helicopter, the average magnetization intensity was determined to be 12.4 A/m. Further, the surrounding area of the crater was relatively highly magnetized; however, the crater rim had a low magnetization intensity. Temporal variation was detected between 2014 and 2021 and dominated the central part of the observation area. Decreased magnetization intensity was identified beneath the caldera, which may become recently demagnetized due to heat supply traveling through fractures in the impermeable layer from the deep heat reservoir.

Cite this article as:
T. Koyama, T. Kaneko, T. Ohminato, A. Watanabe, Y. Honda, T. Akiyama, S. Tanaka, M. Gresse, M. Uyeshima, and Y. Morita, “Magnetization Structure and its Temporal Change of Miyakejima Volcano, Japan, Revealed by Uncrewed Aerial Vehicle Aeromagnetic Survey,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.17 No.5, pp. 644-653, 2022.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] S. Nakada, “Special issue: The 2000 eruption of Miyakejima volcano, Japan,” Bull. Volcanol., Vol.67, No.3, pp. 203-204, doi: 10.1007/s00445-004-0403-5, 2005.
  2. [2] Japan Meterological Agency, “Volcanic gas (SO2) emission rate in Miyakejima,” (in Japanese), https://www.data.jma.go.jp/svd/vois/data/tokyo/320_Miyakejima/320_So2emission.htm [accessed June 11, 2022]
  3. [3] M. Gresse, M. Uyeshima, T. Koyama, H. Hase, K. Aizawa, Y. Yamaya, Y. Morita, D. Weller, T. Rung-Arunwan, T. Kaneko, Y. Sasai, J Zlotnicki, T. Ishido, H. Ueda, and M. Hata, “Hydrothermal and magmatic system of a volcanic island inferred from magnetotellurics, seismicity, self-potential, and thermal image: An example of Miyakejima (Japan),” J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, Vol.126, Issue 6, Article No.e2021JB022034, doi: 10.1029/2021JB022034, 2021.
  4. [4] Y. Sasai, M. Uyeshima, H. Utada, T. Kagiyama, J. Zlotnicki, T. Hashimoto, and Y. Takahashi, “The 2000 activity of Miyake-jima volcano as inferred from electric and magnetic field observations,” J. of Geography (Chigaku Zasshi), Vol.110, Issue 2, pp. 226-244, doi: 10.5026/jgeography.110.2_226, 2001 (in Japanese with English abstract).
  5. [5] Y. Ueda, “3D magnetic structure of Miyakejima volcano before and after the eruption in 2000,” Bull. Volcanol. Soc. Japan, Vol.51, No.3, pp. 161-174, doi: 10.18940/kazan.51.3_161, 2006 (in Japanese with English abstract).
  6. [6] DJI, “Matrice 600 Pro Specification,” https://www.dji.com/matrice600-pro [accessed June 11, 2022]
  7. [7] Geometrics Inc., “G-858 MagMapper Magnetometer Specification,” https://www.geometrics.com/product/g-858 [accessed June 11, 2022]
  8. [8] N. Tada, H. Ichihara, M. Nakano, M. Utsugi, T. Koyama, T. Kuwatani, K. Baba, F. Maeno, A. Takagi, and M. Takeo, “Magnetization structure of Nishinoshima volcano, Ogasawara island arc, obtained from magnetic surveys using an unmanned aerial vehicle,” J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res., Vol.419, Article No.107349, doi: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2021.107349, 2021.
  9. [9] T. Koyama, T. Kaneko, T. Ohminato, A. Watanabe, T. Yanagisawa, and Y. Honda, “Aeromagnetic survey in volcanoes by using autonomous-driven unmanned helicopter,” BUTSURI-TANSA (Geophysical Exploration), Vol.74, pp. 115-122, doi: 10.3124/segj.74.115, 2021 (in Japanese with English abstract).
  10. [10] T. Kaneko, T. Koyama, A. Yasuda, M. Takeo, T. Yanagisawa, K. Kajiwara, and Y. Honda, “Low-altitude remote sensing of volcanoes using an unmanned autonomous helicopter: An example of aeromagnetic observation at Izu-Oshima volcano, Japan,” Int. J. Remote Sens., Vol.32, Issue 5, pp. 1491-1504, doi: 10.1080/01431160903559770, 2011.
  11. [11] T. Ohminato, T. Kaneko, T. Koyama, A. Watanabe, W. Kanda, T. Tameguri, and R. Kazahaya, “Observations using an unmanned aerial vehicle in an area in danger of volcanic eruptions at Kuchinoerabu-jima Volcano, southern Kyushu, Japan,” J. Nat. Disaster Sci., Vol.38, No.1, pp. 85-104, doi: 10.2328/jnds.38.85, 2017.
  12. [12] C. C. Finlay, C. Kloss, N. Olsen, M. D. Hammer, L. Tøffner-Clausen, A. Grayver, and A. Kuvshinov, “The CHAOS-7 geomagnetic field model and observed changes in the South Atlantic Anomaly,” Earth Planets Space, Vol.72, Article No.156, doi: 10.1186/s40623-020-01252-9, 2020.
  13. [13] T. Koyama, W. Kanda, M. Utsugi, T. Kaneko, T. Ohminato, A. Watanabe, H. Tsuji, T. Nishimoto, A. Kuvshinov, and Y. Honda, “Aeromagnetic survey in Kusatsu-Shirane volcano, central Japan, by using an unmanned helicopter,” Earth Planets Space, Vol.73, Article No.139, doi: 10.1186/s40623-021-01466-5, 2021.
  14. [14] H. Akaike, “Likelihood and the Bayes procedure,” Trabajos de estadística y de investigación operativa, Vol.31, No.1, pp. 143-166, doi: 10.1007/BF02888350, 1980.
  15. [15] K. Koyama, N. Sasahara, and K. Kumagawa, “Geomagnetic anomalies and structure of Miyake-jima Volcano,” Technical Bulletin on Hydrography and Oceanography, Vol.27, pp. 87-91, 2009, http://hdl.handle.net/1834/16423 (in Japanese) [accessed June 11, 2022]
  16. [16] T. Koyama, T. Kaneko, T. Ohminato, A. Yasuda, T. Ogawa, A. Watanabe, S. Sakashita, M. Takeo, T. Yanagisawa, Y. Honda, and K. Kajiwara, “An ultra-high-resolution autonomous uncrewed helicopter aeromagnetic survey in Izu-Oshima Island, Japan,” J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res., Vol.425, Article No.107527, doi: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2022.107527, 2022.
  17. [17] C. A. Finn, T. W. Sisson, and M. Deszcz-Pan, “Aerogeophysical measurements of collapse-prone hydrothermally altered zones at Mount Rainier volcano,” Nature, Vol.409, No.6820, pp. 600-603, doi: 10.1038/35054533, 2001.
  18. [18] T. Kobayashi, T. Ohminato, Y. Ida, and E. Fujita, “Intermittent inflations recorded by broadband seismometers prior to caldera formation at Miyake-jima volcano in 2000,” Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., Vols.357-358, pp. 145-151, doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2012.09.039, 2012.
  19. [19] N. Geshi, K. Németh, and T. Oikawa, “Growth of phreatomagmatic explosion craters: A model inferred from Suoana crater in Miyakejima Volcano, Japan,” J. Vol. Geotherm. Res., Vol.201, Issues 1-4, pp. 30-38, doi: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2010.11.012, 2011.
  20. [20] P. Wessel, W. H. F. Smith, R. Scharroo, J. Luis, and F. Wobbe, “Generic mapping tools: Improved version released,” Eos. Trans. AGU, Vol.94, Issue 45, pp. 409-410, doi: 10.1002/2013EO450001, 2013.

Creative Commons License  This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationa License.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Apr. 19, 2024