JDR Vol.16 No.7 pp. 1137-1146
doi: 10.20965/jdr.2021.p1137

Survey Report:

Comparison of the Initial Overseas Evacuation Operations Due to COVID-19: A Focus on Asian Countries

Natt Leelawat*1,*2,*3, Jing Tang*2,*3,*4,†, Kodchakorn Krutphong*3, Suwajo Chaichanasiri*1, Taro Kanno*5, Chen-Wei Li*6, Lien Thi Quynh Le*7, Ho Quic Dung*8, Kumpol Saengtabtim*1, and Ampan Laosunthara*2

*1Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University
254 Phayathai Road, Pathumwan, Bangkok 10330, Thailand

*2Disaster and Risk Management Information Systems Research, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand

Corresponding author

*3Risk and Disaster Management Program, Graduate School, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand

*4International School of Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand

*5Department of Systems Innovation, Faculty of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

*6ALMEC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan

*7University of Economics, Hue University, Hue, Vietnam

*8School of Engineering and Technology, Hue University, Hue, Vietnam

June 20, 2021
July 21, 2021
October 1, 2021
COVID-19, disaster evacuation, pandemic evacuation, overseas evacuation, process management

During the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, state governments all over the world were forced to respond to the crisis, prioritizing not only inbound activities but also their citizens abroad. Our study focused on the reasons for the differences in the evacuation operations, procedures, and outcomes in each country. This study focused on Asian countries/territories that experienced the pandemic earlier than other regions, to compare their prompt evacuation processes between January and May, 2020. Data on the evacuation missions and COVID-19 situation in each studied country/territory were collected. The evacuation operations were reviewed and analyzed using the Business Process Model and Notation to identify the differences that made some of the operations more effective. The insight can contribute to future adaptation and development to implement more effective operations during the emergency response to a pandemic.

Cite this article as:
N. Leelawat, J. Tang, K. Krutphong, S. Chaichanasiri, T. Kanno, C. Li, L. Le, H. Dung, K. Saengtabtim, and A. Laosunthara, “Comparison of the Initial Overseas Evacuation Operations Due to COVID-19: A Focus on Asian Countries,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.16 No.7, pp. 1137-1146, 2021.
Data files:
  1. [1] T. L. D. Huynh, “Does culture matter social distancing under the COVID-19 pandemic?,” Saf. Sci., Vol.130, 104872, 2020.
  2. [2] K. Xie, B. Liang, M. A. Dulebenets, and Y. Mei, “The Impact of Risk Perception on Social Distancing during the COVID-19 Pandemic in China,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, Vol.17, No.17, 6256, 2020.
  3. [3] M. Marchiori, “COVID-19 and the social distancing paradox: Dangers and solutions,” arXiv, arXiv:2005.12446v1, 2020.
  4. [4] K. O’Connell, K. Berluti, S. A. Rhoads, and A. A. Marsh, “Reduced social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic is associated with antisocial behaviors in an online United States sample,” PLoS One, Vol.16, No.1, e0244974, 2021.
  5. [5] [accessed January 5, 2021]
  6. [6] “COVID-19: Stringency Index, May 30, 2020,” [accessed January 30, 2021]
  7. [7] E. Borowski and A. Stathopoulos, “On-demand ridesourcing for urban emergency evacuation events: An exploration of message content, emotionality, and intersectionality,” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduc., Vol.44, 101406, 2020.
  8. [8] N. Leelawat, A. Suppasri, P. Latcharote, and F. Imamura, “The evacuation of Thai citizens during Japan’s 2016 Kumamoto earthquakes: An ICT perspective,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.12, No.sp, pp. 669-677, 2017.
  9. [9] P. Thamarux, A. Suppasri, N. Leelawat, M. Matsuoka, and F. Imamura, “Disaster emergency response plan of the Royal Thai Embassy in Tokyo, Japan: A review,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.14, No.7, pp. 959-971, 2019.
  10. [10] S. H. Ebrahim and Z. A. Memish, “COVID-19 – the role of mass gatherings,” Travel Med. Infect. Disease., Vol.34, 101617, 2020.
  11. [11] “Naming the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and the virus that causes it,” [accessed November 19, 2020]
  12. [12] National Printing Bureau of Japan, “Designate New Coronavirus Infections as an Infectious Disease,” The Japan’s Official Gazette, Special No.4, p. 2, 2020 (in Japanese).
  13. [13] (in Japanese) [accessed August 12, 2020]
  14. [14] “A Timeline of South Korea’s Response to COVID-19,” [accessed August 6, 2020]
  15. [15] “Total Land Area of Singapore,” [accessed on August 6, 2020]
  16. [16] Department of Statistics, “Singapore in Figures 2019,” 2019.
  17. [17] “Explore All Countries – Indonesia,” [accessed October 19, 2020]
  18. [18] “COVID-19: 57 new cases on Sunday (May 31), death toll remains at 115,” [accessed October 2, 2020]
  19. [19] “Vietnam sees no new COVID-19 cases on May 31 evening,” [accessed October 3, 2020]
  20. [20] “Malaysians in Wuhan to be evacuated tomorrow,” [accessed November 3, 2020]
  21. [21] “(8th LD) S. Korea’s first evacuation plane heads to China’s Wuhan,” [accessed December 3, 2020]
  22. [22] “South Korean evacuees from Wuhan welcomed to quarantine centers,” [accessed January 30, 2021]
  23. [23] “Taiwan evacuates 361 on 2 flights from Wuhan, those with fevers rejected,” [accessed March 30, 2021]
  24. [24] [accessed November 16, 2020]
  25. [25] World Health Organization, “Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) Situation Report – 132,” World Health Organization, 2020.
  26. [26] “COVID-19 CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC,” [accessed August 6, 2020]
  27. [27] “Coronavirus: after weeks of waiting, 244 Hong Kong residents return from outbreak epicentre,” [accessed August 20, 2020]
  28. [28] [accessed August 7, 2020]
  29. [29] “Coronavirus: Australia doesn’t have permission from China to evacuate its citizens from Wuhan,” [accessed January 18, 2021]
  30. [30] (in Japanese) [accessed August 6, 2020]
  31. [31] (in Japanese) [accessed November 20, 2020]
  32. [32] “China Airlines Company Profile,” [accessed March 20, 2021]
  33. [33] “COVID-19: Taiwanese’s Journey Home from Wuhan and the International Legal Status of Taiwan,” [accessed June 20, 2021]
  34. [34] “Vietnam Quarantines Citizens Evacuated From Wuhan, China,” [accessed March 5, 2020]
  35. [35] N. Leelawat, J. Tang, K. Saengtabtim, and A. Laosunthara, “Trends of tweets on the Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.15, No.4, pp. 530-533, 2020.
  36. [36] K. Meechang, N. Leelawat, J. Tang, A. Kodaka, and C. Chintanapakdee, “The acceptance of using information technology for disaster risk management: A systematic review,” Eng. J., Vol.24, No.4, pp. 111-132, 2020.
  37. [37] A. Suppasri, M. Kitamura, H. Tsukuda, S. P. Boret, G. Pescaroli, Y. Onoda, F. Imamura, D. Alexander, N. Leelawat, and Syamsidik, “Perceptions of the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan with respect to cultural, information, disaster and social issues,” Prog. Disaster Sci., Vol.10, 100158, 2021.
  38. [38] K. Saengtabtim, J. Tang, and N. Leelawat, “Effectiveness of applying HEALTH-EDRM framework: A comparison of the COVID-19 situation in Asia-Oceania countries and territories,” Proc. of the 2021 2nd Int. Symp. on Instrumentation, Control, Artificial Intelligence, and Robotics (ICA-SYMP), pp. 1-4, 2021.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Jun. 03, 2024