JDR Vol.16 No.6 pp. 922-928
doi: 10.20965/jdr.2021.p0922


Issues in Tsunami Countermeasures from the Viewpoint of Geotechnical Engineering

Hiroshi Nakazawa*,†, Tadashi Hara**, and Koichi Kajiwara***

*Shizuoka Institute of Science and Technology
2200-2 Toyosawa, Fukuroi, Shizuoka 437-8555, Japan

Corresponding author

**Kochi University, Kochi, Japan

***National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Resilience (NIED), Hyogo, Japan

May 10, 2021
July 14, 2021
September 15, 2021
earthquake, tsunami, tsunami evacuation building, pile foundation, liquefaction

The 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake, with its epicenter off the Sanriku coast, measured the moment magnitude of 9.0, had a maximum seismic intensity of 7 in the northern part of Miyagi Prefecture, and impacted an area of 450 km. Consequently, a variety of unprecedented problems were made apparent. In particular, the human and property damage wrecked by the ensuing tsunami triggered our response for earthquake and tsunami resistance. In addition to conventional issues, such as earthquake resistance of buildings, disruption of lifelines, liquefaction of residential land and soil structures, and tsunami damage in coastal areas, there were new challenges, such as prolongation of earthquake disaster waste treatment. During the 10 years since the 2011 earthquake, tsunami countermeasures have been reexamined, and based on the concept of multiple protections, both tangible and intangible countermeasures have been advanced. This article addresses technical problems related to complex disasters, and includes the example of actual damage to a river levee in the Iwate Prefecture and the case of a building overturned by tsunami in Onagawa City, Miyagi Prefecture. It also discusses liquefaction caused by earthquakes and lists the points to be considered when selecting tsunami evacuation buildings to tackle future tsunami disasters.

Cite this article as:
H. Nakazawa, T. Hara, and K. Kajiwara, “Issues in Tsunami Countermeasures from the Viewpoint of Geotechnical Engineering,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.16 No.6, pp. 922-928, 2021.
Data files:
  1. [1] Japan Meteorological Agency, “Report on the 2011 Off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake,” Technical Report of the Japan Meteorological Agency, No.133, (in Japanese) [accessed April 26, 2021]
  2. [2] Tohoku Constructors Association Federation, “Great East Japan Earthquake Support Activities,” p. 2, 2013 (in Japanese).
  3. [3] Committee on Urgent recommendations for reconstruction after the Great East Japan Earthquake Japan, “Urgent recommendations for reconstruction after the Great East Japan Earthquake Japan,” Civil Engineering Consultants Association, 2011 (in Japanese).
  4. [4] Ministry of the Environment, Government of Japan, “Archive of the disaster waste disposal treat,” (in Japanese) [accessed April 14, 2021]
  5. [5] T. Hara, H. Hemanta, S. Kuroda, K. Kuribayashi, T. Nishi, H. Furuichi, K. Takezawa, and T. Osumi, “Analysis of the compound disaster suffered by a river dike due to the 2011 off the pacific coast of Tohoku earthquake,” Japan Geotechnical J., Vol.9, No.4, pp. 645-658, 2014 (in Japanese).
  6. [6] Disaster Management, Cabinet Office, “Report of the Committee for Technical Investigation on Countermeasures for Earthquakes and Tsunamis Based on the Lessons Learned from the “2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake”,” (in Japanese) [accessed April 27, 2021]
  7. [7] F. Kato, T. Harano, and K. Hamacuchi, “Technical Note on Utilization of Natural and Regional Infrastructures in Regional Development for Tsunami Disaster Prevention,” Technical Note of National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management (NILIM), No.986, 61pp., 2017 (in Japanese with English abstract).
  8. [8] S. Miyajima et al., “Damage to Port and Port-related Facilities by the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake,” Technical Note of Port and Airport Research Institute (PARI), No.1291, 2015 (in Japanese with English abstract).
  9. [9] Tohoku Electric Power, “On Tsunami protection measures for domestic nuclear power plants,” (in Japanese) [accessed April 4, 2021]
  10. [10] T. Tobita, S. Iai, and S. Ouchi, “Combined failure mechanism of a building supported by piled foundations under liquefaction and tsunami,” J. of Natural Disaster Science, Vol.34, No.1, pp. 23-39, 2015 (in Japanese with English abstract).
  11. [11] H. Kiku, E. Yamaguchi, S. Towata, A. Matsumoto, T. Tsuchiya, H. Fukushima, and D. Kimura, “Several in-situ tests on liquefaction potential at peripheral ground of pile foundation pulled out by Tsunami,” The Japanese Geotechnical Society 47th Annual Meeting, pp. 1831-1832, 2012 (in Japanese).
  12. [12] Y. Fukumoto, H. Sukegawa, N. Iwamae, and T. Ikieeya, “The 2011 Off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquakiee Tsunami Hydraulic Data Observed at Choshi Offshore,” J. of Japan Society of Civil Engineers B2, Vol.68, No.1, pp. 1-5, 2012 (in Japanese with English abstract).
  13. [13] Y. Okumura, R. Kato, and F. Oka, “Liquefaction Analysis in One Dimension of the Soil Ground Due to Tsunami,” J. of Japan Society of Civil Engineers A1, Vol.68, No.4, pp. I_1171-I_1178, 2012 (in Japanese with English abstract).
  14. [14] Y. Sawada, M. Miyake, H. Sumida, and T. Kawabata, “Pore Water Pressure and Liquefaction in Saturated Sand Bed Induced by Tsunami,” Trans. of The Japanese Society of Irrigation, Drainage and Rural Engineering, Vol.82, No.2, pp. 113-120, 2014.
  15. [15] Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, “On the law on Tsunami disaster prevention area development,” (in Japanese) [accessed April 11, 2021]
  16. [16] Weathernews, “Great East Japan Earthquake Tsunami Questionnaire,” (in Japanese) [accessed April 4, 2021]
  17. [17] H. Nakazawa and T. Sugano, “Experimental Study on Countermeasure for Liquefaction To Runway Pavement in Airport Site,” J. of Japan Society of Civil Engineers F, Vol.66, No.1, pp .27-43, 2010 (in Japanese with English abstract).

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on May. 19, 2024