JDR Vol.16 No.3 pp. 329-342
doi: 10.20965/jdr.2021.p0329


Estimation of Potential Economic Losses Due to Flooding Considering Variations of Spatial Distribution of Houses and Firms in a City

Kaito Kotone*, Kenji Taniguchi**,†, Koichi Nakamura***, and Yuki Takayama**

*Division of Environmental Design, Kanazawa University
Kakuma-Machi, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 920-1192, Japan

**Faculty of Geosciences and Civil Engineering, Kanazawa University, Ishikawa, Japan

Corresponding author

***Nihonkai Consultant Co., Ltd., Ishikawa, Japan

September 30, 2020
November 30, 2020
April 1, 2021
flood, climate change, inundation simulation, flood economic loss, computable urban economics (CUE) model

In Japan, flood disasters caused by record-breaking heavy rainfall frequently cause significant damages. It is also great concern that heavy rainfall may increase and occur more frequently due to global warming. In July 2013, a heavy rainfall event caused record-flooding of the Kakehashi River in Ishikawa Prefecture. In this study, pseudo global warming (PGW) experiments were implemented for the heavy rainfall in 1998 and 2013 around the Kakehashi River basin. Based on the results of PGW simulations, rainfall with different return periods were generated. Runoff analyses and inundation simulations were carried out by forcings with multiple return periods, and the results were used to estimate the economic losses due to flood inundation. Expected values of the economic losses were calculated using two methods for multiple return periods. Differences between the two expected values indicates the importance of the weighting method for the result of each return period. In addition, variations of spatial distribution of houses and firms in a city (i.e., urban structure) were simulated using a computable urban economics (CUE) model for the area of middle-lower reach of the Kakehashi River basin to examine its impact on economic loss due to flooding. In the simulation using the CUE model, a more severe flood inundation risk and an additional insurance burden for general households were added, and possible variations of urban structure were estimated around the lower part of the Kakehashi River basin. Under the more severe risk condition, relocation proceeded from higher risk areas to safer areas, and possible economic losses decreased in the target area. This result indicates that proper recognition of risk can reduce flood damages. On the other hand, there were small variations in economic losses under the condition with the additional flood insurance burden.

Cite this article as:
K. Kotone, K. Taniguchi, K. Nakamura, and Y. Takayama, “Estimation of Potential Economic Losses Due to Flooding Considering Variations of Spatial Distribution of Houses and Firms in a City,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.16 No.3, pp. 329-342, 2021.
Data files:
  1. [1] Japan Meteorological Agency, “Clinate Change Monitoring Report 2015,” 2016, [accessed Nobemver 18, 2020]
  2. [2] Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, “Implementation of disaster prevention and mitigation at a new stage,” 2015, (in Japanese) [accessed September 15, 2020]
  3. [3] K. Taniguchi and Y. Shibuo, “Estimation of expectation of flooding water depth based on heavy rainfalls with different return periods simulated by pseudo global warming method,” J. of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. B1, Vol.74, No.5, pp. I_1405-I_1410, 2018 (in Japanese).
  4. [4] Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, “The flood control economic survey manual (draft),” 2020, (in Japanese) [accessed September 15, 2020]
  5. [5] A. Takagi, S. Muto, and N. Ohta, “Economic evaluation of flood control countermeasures by using computable urban economic model,” Advances in River Engineering, Vol.7, pp. 423-428, 2001 (in Japanese).
  6. [6] H. Seya, Y. Yamagata, K. Nakamichi, and M. Tsutsumi, “Flood vulnerability assessment using a CUE model in the Tokyo metropolitan area,” Papers of Research Meeting on Civil Engineering Planning, Vol.44, 2011 (in Japanese).
  7. [7] M. Teramoto, Y. Ichikawa, Y. Tachikawa, and M. Shiiba, “Study on applicability of landuse regulation strategies based on flood risk management,” J. of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. B1, Vol.66, No.2, pp. 130-144, 2010 (in Japanese).
  8. [8] W. C. Skamarock, J. B. Klemp, J. Dudhia, D. O. Gill, D. Barker, M. G. Duda, X.-Y. Huang, W. Wang, and J. G. Powers, “A description of the advanced research WRF version 3,” NCAR Technical Note, NCAR/RN-475+STR, doi: 10.5065/D68S4MVH, 2008.
  9. [9] National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP)/National Weather Service/NOAA/U.S. Department of Commerce, “NCEP GDAS/FNL 0.25 Degree Global Tropospheric Analyses and Forecast Grids,” Research Data Archive at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, Computational and Information Systems Laboratory, doi: 10.5065/D65Q4T4Z, 2015 [accessed December 2, 2018]
  10. [10] R. W. Reynolds, T. M. Smith, C. Liu, D. B. Chelton, K. S. Casey, and M. G. Schlax, “Daily high-resolution-blended analyses for sea surface temperature,” J. Clim., Vol.20, No.22, pp. 5473-5496, 2007.
  11. [11] T. Sato, F. Kimura, and A. Kitoh, “Projection of global warming onto regional precipitation over Mongolia using a regional climate model,” J. of Hydrology, Vol.333, No.1, pp. 144-154, 2007.
  12. [12] K. E. Taylor, R. J. Stouffer, and G. A. Meehl, “An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design,” Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., Vol.93, No.4, pp. 485-498, 2012.
  13. [13] K. Taniguchi, “A simple ensemble simulation technique for assessment of future variations in specific high-impact weather events,” J. Geophys. Res: Atmos., Vol.123, No.7, pp. 3443-3461, 2018.
  14. [14] T. Sayama, G. Ozawa, T. Kawakami, S. Nabesaka, and K. Fukami, “Rainfall-Runoff-Inundation analysis of the 2010 Pakistan flood in the Kabul River basin,” Hydrological Science J., Vol.57, No.2, pp. 298-312, 2012.
  15. [15] H. Sanuki, Y. Shibuo, S. A. Lee, K. Yoshimura, Y. Tajima, H. Furumai, and S. Sato, “Inundation forecast simulatoin in urbanized coastal low-lying areas considering multiple flood causing factors,” J. of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. B2, Vol.72, No.2, pp. I_517-I_522, 2016 (in Japanese).
  16. [16] K. Taniguchi and Y. Shibuo, “Difference of flood and inundation characteristics under various types of precipitation patterns,” J. of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. B1, Vol.74, No.4, pp. I_1489-I_1494, 2018 (in Japanese).
  17. [17] S. Machida, S. Kawagoe, S. Kazama, M. Sawamoto, H. Yokoki, and K. Yasuhara, “Evaluation of flood damages for climate change,” Proc. of the Symp. on Global Environment, Vol.15, pp. 155-160, 2007 (in Japanese).
  18. [18] M. Fujita and H. Ogawa, “Multiple equilibria and structural transition of non-monocentric urban configurations,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol.12, No.2, pp. 161-196, 1982.
  19. [19] K. Nakamura and Y. Takayama, “Development of an agglomeration model considering interactions between firms and households,” J. of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. D3, Vol.74, No.5, pp.I_555-I_569, 2018 (in Japanese).
  20. [20] G. M. Ahlfeldt, S. J. Redding, D. M. Sturm, and N. Wolf, “The economics of density: Evidence from the Berlin wall,” Econometrica, Vol.83, No.6, pp. 2127-2189, 2015.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Jul. 19, 2024