single-dr.php

JDR Vol.16 No.2 pp. 182-193
(2021)
doi: 10.20965/jdr.2021.p0182

Paper:

Memories and Conflicts of Disaster Victims: Why They Wish to Dismantle Disaster Remains

Nao Sakaguchi

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), National Museum of Ethnology
10-1 Senri Expo Park, Suita, Osaka 565-8511, Japan

Corresponding author

Received:
August 1, 2020
Accepted:
December 3, 2020
Published:
February 1, 2021
Keywords:
disaster remains, memories, narrative, negative heritage, Great East Japan Earthquake
Abstract

This paper focuses on the memories and narratives of victims of disasters recalled using objects – namely, disaster remains – and examine what they mean to victims who want them to be dismantled. In the town of Otsuchi, Iwate Prefecture, which was devastated by the tsunami that occurred during the Great East Japan Earthquake (GEJE), the issue of whether to preserve the former town office building – the site where the mayor and many municipal workers fell victim to the tsunami – developed into a heated controversy. Among the many affected residents, who desired dismantlement, some asserted that it was a “place of shame.” Most of these people were men in their 60s at the time of the catastrophe and recalled the pre-disaster situation of the local society; they were emotionally triggered by the accident to the tsunami. There are two reasons for the mention of shame in this context. First, former leaders of community activities (before the calamity) strongly criticized the fact that the town officials, who had been in a position to protect the residents, had failed to evacuate and became casualties. Second, there were residents who had an objective view of the local society based on their experiences working outside Otsuchi; this group felt that their pre-disaster activities were partially to be blamed for the loss of many town officials and were thus ashamed of themselves. Among disaster-affected residents who desire dismantlement, disaster remains serve to evoke diverse, fragmentary memories related to their life stories. While these men were able to reconfirm their love for their hometown, they used the narrative of “shame” to resist the impact of disaster remains by which an unequivocal image of local society is broadly disseminated via accidents surrounding the disaster remains, which is why victims wish for dismantlement.

Cite this article as:
N. Sakaguchi, “Memories and Conflicts of Disaster Victims: Why They Wish to Dismantle Disaster Remains,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.16 No.2, pp. 182-193, 2021.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] N. Ogawa, “The Invention of ‘Shinsai-ikou’ (Earthquake Disaster Remains): Social Construction of a Category after the Great East Japan Earthquake,” Annual report on research and education, Faculty of Letters, Nara Women’s University, Vol.12, pp. 67-82, 2015.
  2. [2] R. Ishihara, http://judi.sub.jp/judi/a1506/siryo/04.pdf [accessed April 19, 2020]
  3. [3] S. Sugimoto, “Problems of Preservation and Utilization of Remaining Structures from a Disaster for a Town Reconstruction Planning: Using Mt. Unzen Fugendake Volcanic Disaster and Great East Japan Earthquake as an Example of Reconstruction,” J. of Policy Studies, Vol.19, pp. 37-56, 2018.
  4. [4] N. Sakaguchi and S. Sato, “Inspection: Consensus-building process on how to preserve the disaster remains,” Study of Disaster, Vol.14, Tohoku Gakuin University, pp. 150-159, 2020.
  5. [5] Miyagi Prefecture, “Report of the Miyagi Prefecture Earthquake Disaster Remains Expert Committee,” 2014, https://www.pref.miyagi.jp/uploaded/attachment/288105.pdf [accessed April 20, 2020]
  6. [6] Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, City Bureau, Parks, Green Spaces and Landscape Division, 2012, https://www.mlit.go.jp/crd/park/joho/dl/fukko/index.html [accessed November 1, 2013]
  7. [7] The Kahoku Shimpo, Published on September 19, 2011.
  8. [8] S. Sato and F. Imamura, “Quantitative Analysis Situation of Disaster Remains in the Affected Area of the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami Disaster – Content Analysis with Text Data on News Articles for 5 Years after the Disaster –,” J. of Disaster Recovery and Revitalization, Vol.9, pp. 11-19, 2016.
  9. [9] Asahi Weekly, Published on Norvember 14, 2012.
  10. [10] The Nikkei, Published on July 3, 2015.
  11. [11] M. Foley and J. Lennon, “Editorial: Heart of Darkness,” Int. J. of Heritage Studies, Vol.2, No.4, pp. 198-211, 1996.
  12. [12] H. Azuma, “Fukushima Kanko Project Ideological Map β Vol.4-2,” Genron, 2013.
  13. [13] H. Azuma, “Earth Becoming a Theme Park,” Genron, 2019.
  14. [14] H. Endo, “A Study on Dark Tourism : Gazing to Darkness,” J. of Institute of Humanities, Human and Social sciences Ritsumeikan University, Vol.110, pp. 3-22, 2016.
  15. [15] S. Takezawa, “A legacy that continues to defy the passage of time,” Monthly Minpaku, National Museum of Ethnology, Vol.40, No.8, pp. 2-3, 2016.
  16. [16] P. Nora, “Entre Mémoire et Historie: La problématique des lieux,” Éditions Gallimard, 1984.
  17. [17] S. Yamashita, “Reconstruction Tourism,” H. Shimizu and S. Kimura (Eds.), “New man new society,” Kyoto University Press, pp. 327-356, 2015.
  18. [18] Y. Miyamoto, “The Possibility of Passing Down Living Practice in a Negative Historical Legacy: A Case Study of an Art Project in a Leprosy Sanatorium,” J. of Environmental Sociology, Vol.21, pp. 41-55. 2015.
  19. [19] Y. Fukuma, “The Postwar History of the Sites of Memories on Hiroshima and Nagasaki,” J. of Institute of Humanities, Human and Social Sciences Ritsumeikan University, Vol.110, pp. 111-137, 2016.
  20. [20] H. Yamauchi, “Bring out narratives from the affected debris,” people who tell stories, National Museum of Japanese History, pp. 8-11, 2018.
  21. [21] S. Hayama, “Kesennuma The Ogata Family and the Issues Arising from Cultural Property Rescue Activities,” People who tell stories, National Museum of Japanese History, pp. 3-7, 2018.
  22. [22] N. Sakaguchi, “Conflicts among local residents regarding the remains of tsunami,” Study of Disaster, Tohoku Gakuin University, Vol.13, pp. 153-161, 2019.
  23. [23] Asahi Weekly, Published on January 21, 2019.
  24. [24] R. Benedict, “The Chrysanthemum and the Sword: Patterns of Japanese Culture,” Charles E. Tuttle Company, 1954.
  25. [25] Cabinet Office, “Director General for Policy Planning and Coordination,” 2016, http://bosaijapan.jp/saigai_iko/important [accessed June 20, 2020]
  26. [26] Otsuchi Town, https://www.town.otsuchi.iwate.jp/gyosei/ [accessed July 20, 2020]
  27. [27] Iwate Statistics, http://www3.pref.iwate.jp/webdb/view/outside/s14Tokei/top.html [accessed July 20, 2020]
  28. [28] Otsuchi Town, “The Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami Overview of Damage in Otsuchi Town,” 2014.
  29. [29] The Yomiuri Shimbun, Published on November 20, 2015.
  30. [30] Asahi Weekly, Published on October 12, 2018.
  31. [31] Asahi Weekly, Published on December 30, 2018.
  32. [32] The Kahoku Shimpo, Published on March 2, 2018.
  33. [33] Otsuchi Town, “Handbook of the town 1981,” 1981.
  34. [34] Otsuchi Town, “Statistics of Otsuchi Town 1984 edition No.2,” 1984.
  35. [35] Research and Statistics Division, Office of General Policy, Iwate Prefecture, 2005.
  36. [36] Otsuchi Town fisherman’s cooperative association, “History of Fishery in Otsuchi Town,” Otsuchi Fishery Cooperative Association, 1983.
  37. [37] Otsuchi Town, “Otsuchi 1973,” 1973.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Apr. 22, 2024