In every disaster, problems of information and communication distribution always occur. The communication channel is very dependent on various supporting facilities. Electricity, transmitter towers, broadcasting stations, to human resources. In two big disasters in Indonesia in 2018: the Lombok earthquake; and the earthquake, tsunami and liquefaction in Palu, there were issues of the information and communication channels. Local people do not know the conditions that occur in their area and the situation of their families. While outsiders, the government, and rescue teams did not get detailed information from the affected areas. In countries with high intensity of natural disasters, emergency broadcasting policies have been long practiced. The simplest device for emergency broadcasting is radio. This kind of media can immediately air with simple facilities. Regardless, the initiative of emergency radio has not yet adopted into regulation in Indonesia. Therefore, the emergency radio initiator limited to a handful of organization like in Lombok earthquake. Conversely in Palu disaster, there was a Ministerial Decree of Information and Communication Ministry Number 773/2018 (KM 773), regulation that simplify access to radio frequency. Using comparative method, this research examined these two disasters to analyze the differences of emergency radio practices. Only 1.5 months away and similar location features, the emergency radios initiation differ in several aspects related subjects that regulated in this KM. The result shows that this KM can broaden all aspects of emergency broadcasting radio. Although, the KM unable to shorten the time of emergency radio implementation. Regulation change only limited to frequency access. A broader regulation change is needed to support the practice of emergency radio.

1. [1] Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana (BNPB), “Jangan Lupa, Ribuan Korban Gempa Lombok-Sumbawa Juga Masih Memerlukan Bantuan Kita,” 2018, https://bnpb.go.id/berita/jangan-lupa-ribuan-korban-gempa-lombok-sumbawa-juga-masih-memerlukan-bantuan-kita (in Indonesian) [accessed May 9, 2020]
2. [2] National Center for Earthquake Studies of Indonesia, “Investigation on the Palu 2018 Earthquake in Central Sulawesi Province (in Bahasa Indonesia),” Research and Development Agency of Ministry of Public Work and Housing, Indonesia, 2018, http://litbang.pu.go.id/puskim/source/pdf/Laporan%20Kajian%20Gempa%20Palu%20Sulawesi%20Tengah.pdf (in Indonesian) [accessed May 9, 2020]
3. [3] Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana (BNPB), “Gempabumi Dan Tsunami Sulawesi Tengah,” 2019, https://bnpb.go.id/infografis/infografis-gempabumi-m74-tsunami-sulawesi-tengah (in Indonesian) [accessed May 9, 2020]
4. [4] M. A. Birowo, “Community Radio and Grassroots Democracy: A Case Study of Three Villages in Yogyakarta Region, Indonesia,” Ph.D. Thesis, Curtin University of Technology, 2010.
5. [5] Jaringan Radio Komunitas Indonesia (JRKI), “Radio Komunitas: Membangun Komunikasi dan Informasi Partisipatif di Masa Tanggap Bencana melalui Radio Darurat,” https://jrki.or.id/2019/03/07/radio-komunitas-membangun-komunikasi-dan-informasi-partisipatif-di-masa-tanggap-bencana-melalui-radio-darurat/ (in Indonesian) [accessed March 17, 2020]
6. [6] B. Miles and S. Morse, “The role of news media in natural disaster risk and recovery,” Ecological Economics, Vol.63, Issues 2-3, pp. 365-373, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.08.007, 2007.
7. [7] R. F. Moody, “Radio’s Role During Hurricane Katrina: A Case Study of WWL Radio and the United Radio Broadcasters of New Orleans,” J. of Radio & Audio Media, Vol.16, Issue 2, pp. 160-180, doi: 10.1080/19376520903277021, 2009.
8. [8] A. Tanesia, “Women, Community Radio, and Post-Disaster Recovery Process,” Women in Action, Vol.2007, No.2, pp. 68-76, 2007.
9. [9] L. P. Victoria, “Community based Approaches to Disaster Mitigation,” Proc. of Regional Workshop on Best Practices in Disaster Mitigation, pp. 270-290, 2002.
10. [10] J. Hibino and R. Shaw, “Role of Community Radio in Post Disaster Recovery: Comparative Analysis of Japan and Indonesia,” R. Shaw (Ed.), “Disaster Recovery: Used or Misused Development Opportunity,” pp. 385-410, Springer, 2014.
11. [11] Australian Broadcasting Corporation International Development (ABCID), “Disaster Information Providers in Indonesia,” https://www.abc.net.au/cm/lb/9223290/data/disaster-information-providers-in-indonesia-data.pdf [accessed May 9, 2020]
12. [12] J. Greenberg and T. J. Scanlon, “Old Media, New Media, and the Complex Story of Disasters,” Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Natural Hazard Science, doi: 10.1093/acrefore/9780199389407.013.21, 2016.
13. [13] H. Rodríguez, E. L. Quarantelli, and R. R. Dynes (Eds), “Handbook of Disaster Research,” Springer, 2007.
14. [14] K. Tierney, C. Bevc, and E. Kuligowski, “Metaphors Matter: Disaster Myths, Media Frames, and Their Consequences in Hurricane Katrina,” The Annals of American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol.604, pp. 57-81, doi: 10.1177/0002716205285589, 2006.
15. [15] Z. S. Ali, “Media Myths and Realities in Natural Disasters,” European J. of Business and Social Sciences, Vol.2, No.1, pp. 125-133, 2013.
16. [16] T. Y. H. Tsu, “Making Virtues of Disaster: “Beautiful Tales” from the Kobe Flood of 1938,” Asian Studies Review, Vol.32, Issue 2, pp. 197-214, doi: 10.1080/10357820802061100, 2008.
17. [17] L. Pearce, “Disaster Management and Community Planning, and Public Participation: How to Achieve Sustainable Hazard Mitigation,” Natural Hazards, Vol.28, Issue 2, pp. 211-228, doi: 10.1023/A:1022917721797, 2003.
18. [18] G. D. Haddow and K. S. Haddow, “Disaster Communications in A Changing Media World,” 1st Edition, Butterworth-Heinemann, 2008.
19. [19] M. Aronson-Storrier and K. da Costa, “Regulating disasters? The role of international law in disaster prevention and management,” Disaster Prevention and Management, Vol.26, No.5, pp. 502-513, doi: 10.1108/DPM-09-2017-0218, 2017.
20. [20] D. Amaratunga and R. Haigh, “Post-Disaster Reconstruction of the Built Environment: Rebuilding for Resilience,” Wiley-Blackwell, 2011.
21. [21] F. Haines, “Addressing the risk, reading the landscape: The role of agency in regulation,” Regulation & Governance, Vol.5, Issue 1, pp. 118-144, doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5991.2010.01097.x, 2011.
22. [22] V. De Majo and J. Olsson, “Institutional foundations of disaster risk reduction policy: Exploring and elaborating on two different cases: Argentina and Sweden,” Disaster Prevention and Management, Vol.28, No.2, pp. 245-257, doi: 10.1108/DPM-08-2018-0260, 2019.
23. [23] C. Kenny, “Disaster risk reduction in developing countries: costs, benefits, and institutions,” Disasters, Vol.36, Issue 4, pp. 559-588, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2012.01275.x, 2012.
24. [24] R. E. A. Ashu and D. Van Niekerk, “Building national and local capacity for disaster risk management in Cameroon,” Disaster Prevention and Management, doi: 10.1108/DPM-06-2019-0176, 2019.
25. [25] D. I. Putra and M. Matsuyuki, “Disaster Management Following Decentralization in Indonesia: Regulation, Institutional Establishment, Planning, and Budgeting,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.14, No.1, pp. 173-187, doi: 10.20965/jdr.2019.p0173, 2019.
26. [26] A. Lijphart, “Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method,” The American Political Science Review, Vol.65, No.3, pp. 682-693, doi: 10.2307/1955513, 1971.
27. [27] C. C. Ragin, “The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies (with a New Introduction),” University of California Press, 2014.
28. [28] Kementerian Sosial Republik Indonesia (Kemsos), “Tujuh Kementerian Kebut Pembahasan RUU Penanggulangan Bencana,” https://www.kemsos.go.id/tujuh-kementerian-kebut-pembahasan-ruu-penanggulangan-bencana [accessed March 17, 2020]
29. [29] Direktorat Pengembangan Pitalebar, Ditjen Penyelenggaraan Pos dan Informatika, Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika, “Roadmap Penerapan Sistem Komunikasi PPDR di Indonesia,” National Workshop Optimalisasi Peran Radio Darurat (Komunitas) untuk Pengurangan Risiko Bencana, 2019.