JDR Vol.15 No.5 pp. 588-598
doi: 10.20965/jdr.2020.p0588


A Stakeholder Analysis Approach for Area Business Continuity Management: A Systematic Review

Sansanee Sapapthai*1, Natt Leelawat*1,*2,†, Jing Tang*2,*3, Akira Kodaka*4, Chatpan Chintanapakdee*2,*5, Eri Ino*6, and Kenji Watanabe*7

*1Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University
254 Phayathai Road, Pathumwan, Bangkok 10330, Thailand

Corresponding author

*2Disaster and Risk Management Information Systems Research Group, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand

*3International School of Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand

*4Graduate School of System Design and Management, Keio University, Kanagawa, Japan

*5Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand

*6Advanced Disaster Prevention Engineering Center, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Aichi, Japan

*7Department of Architecture, Civil Engineering and Industrial Management Engineering, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Aichi, Japan

November 7, 2019
May 15, 2020
August 1, 2020
stakeholder analysis, disaster management, area-business continuity management (Area-BCM), business continuity management (BCM), SWOT analysis

Area-Business Continuity Management (Area-BCM) is a new disaster management concept developed by the Japan International Cooperation Agency in 2013. One of the greatest challenges encountered in achieving a successful implementation of Area-BCM is the public–private partnership. Since stakeholder analysis is the key to understanding the complex relationships among all the parties involved, a variety of methods for and approaches to stakeholder analysis have been developed in several fields and with different objectives. Although studies on stakeholder analysis are attracting more attention, the number of studies on stakeholder analysis in the field of disaster management is still limited. The purpose of this study is to explore several stakeholder analysis methods applied to disaster management, particularly Area-BCM. By reviewing research articles in the ScienceDirect database from 1990 to 2018, this review article categorizes stakeholder analysis methods into three groups: (1) identifying stakeholders, (2) differentiating and categorizing stakeholders, and (3) investigating relationships among stakeholders. This study also identifies the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (i.e., performs a SWOT analysis) of each existing method. Further, this study promotes the significance and advantages of stakeholder analysis in disaster management, especially in Area-BCM-related projects by helping researchers and practitioners to understand the existing stakeholder analysis methods and select the appropriate one.

Cite this article as:
S. Sapapthai, N. Leelawat, J. Tang, A. Kodaka, C. Chintanapakdee, E. Ino, and K. Watanabe, “A Stakeholder Analysis Approach for Area Business Continuity Management: A Systematic Review,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.15 No.5, pp. 588-598, 2020.
Data files:
  1. [1] S. A. Torabi, H. R. Soufi, and N. Sahebjamnia, “A new framework for business impact analysis in business continuity management (with a case study),” Safety Science, Vol.68, pp. 309-323, 2014.
  2. [2] F. Imamura, A. Suppasri, P. Latcharote, T. Otake, N. Leelawat, and D. N. Nguyen, “A Global Assessment of Historical and Future Tsunami Hazards Based on Seismic Records Over the Last 400 Years and Estimated Seismic Gaps,” International Research Institute of Disaster Science, Tohoku University (IRIDeS), 2017.
  3. [3] N. Leelawat, A. Muhari, M. Srivichai, A. Suppasri, F. Imamura, and J. D. Bricker, “Preference for information during flood disasters: A study of Thailand and Indonesia,” B. McLellan (Ed.), “Sustainable Future for Human Security,” pp. 335-349, Springer, 2018.
  4. [4] N. Leelawat, A. Suppasri, and F. Imamura, “Disaster recovery and reconstruction following the 2011 Great East Japan earthquake and tsunami: A business process management perspective,” Int. J. of Disaster Risk Science, Vol.6, No.3, pp. 310-314, 2015.
  5. [5] A. Suppasri, I. Charvet, J. Macabuag, T. Rossetto, N. Leelawat, P. Latcharote, and F. Imamura, “Building damage assessment and implications for future tsunami fragility estimations,” Handbook of Coastal Disaster Mitigation for Engineers and Planners, pp. 147-178, 2015.
  6. [6] N. Sahebjamnia, S. A. Torabi, and S. A. Mansouri, “Building organizational resilience in the face of multiple disruptions,” Int. J. of Production Economics, Vol.197, pp. 63-83, 2018.
  7. [7] H. Baba, T. Watanabe, M. Nagaishi, and H. Matsumoto, “Area Business Continuity Management, a new opportunity for building economic resilience,” Procedia Economics and Finance, Vol.18, pp. 296-303, 2014.
  8. [8] P. Thammarux, N. Leelawat, and M. Matsuoka, “Seismic hazard evaluation system development for BCP assessment of Thai tourist startups,” Proc. of the 7th Asia Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, 2018.
  9. [9] H. Baba et al., “Introductory study on Disaster Risk Assessment and Area Business Continuity Planning in industry agglomerated areas in the ASEAN,” IDRiM J., Vol.3, No.2, pp. 184-195, 2013.
  10. [10] P. Thammarux, A. Suppasri, N. Leelawat, M. Matsuoka, and F. Imamura, “Disaster emergency response plan of the Royal Thai Embassy in Tokyo, Japan: A review,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.14, No.7, pp. 959-971, 2019.
  11. [11] T. Ono and K. Watanabe, “Area business continuity management approach to build sustainable communities,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.12, No.4, pp. 806-810, 2017.
  12. [12] K. Y. Mok, G. Q. Shen, and J. Yang, “Stakeholder management studies in mega construction projects: A review and future directions,” Int. J. of Project Management, Vol.33, No.2, pp. 446-457, 2015.
  13. [13] S. Raum, “A framework for integrating systematic stakeholder analysis in ecosystem services research: Stakeholder mapping for forest ecosystem services in the UK,” Ecosystem Services, Vol.29, Part A, pp. 170-184, 2018.
  14. [14] M. Yu, C. Yang, and Y. Li, “Big data in natural disaster management: a review,” Geosciences, Vol.8, No.5, Article No. 165, 2018.
  15. [15] M. S. Reed, A. Graves, N. Dandy, H. Posthumus, K. Hubacek, J. Morris, C. Prell, C. H. Quinn, and L. C. Stringer, “Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management,” J. of Environmental Management, Vol.90, No.5, pp. 1933-1949, 2009.
  16. [16] F. Li, B. Pan, Y. Wu, and L. Shan, “Application of game model for stakeholder management in construction of ecological corridors: A case study on Yangtze River Basin in China,” Habitat Int., Vol.63, pp. 113-121, 2017.
  17. [17] J. Lienert, F. Schnetzer, and K. Ingold, “Stakeholder analysis combined with social network analysis provides fine-grained insights into water infrastructure planning processes,” J. of Environmental Management, Vol.125, pp. 134-148, 2013.
  18. [18] K. Long, Y. Wang, Y. Zhao, and L. Chen, “Who are the stakeholders and how do they respond to a local government payments for ecosystem services program in a developed area: A case study from Suzhou, China,” Habitat Int., Vol.49, pp. 1-9, 2015.
  19. [19] R. Grimble and K. Wellard, “Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management: a review of principles, contexts, experiences and opportunities,” Agricultural Systems, Vol.55, No.2, pp. 173-193, 1997.
  20. [20] R. Freeman, “Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach,” Pitman series in business and public policy, Pitman, 1984.
  21. [21] C. Billgren and H. Holmén, “Approaching reality: Comparing stakeholder analysis and cultural theory in the context of natural resource management,” Land Use Policy, Vol.25, No.4, pp. 550-562, 2008.
  22. [22] J. M. Bryson, M. Q. Patton, and R. A. Bowman, “Working with evaluation stakeholders: A rationale, step-wise approach and toolkit,” Evaluation and Program Planning, Vol.34, No.1, pp. 1-12, 2011.
  23. [23] X. Song and X. Mu, “The safety regulation of small-scale coal mines in China: Analysing the interests and influences of stakeholders,” Energy Policy, Vol.52, pp. 472-481, 2013.
  24. [24] A. H. Becker, P. Matson, M. Fischer, and M. D. Mastrandrea, “Towards seaport resilience for climate change adaptation: Stakeholder perceptions of hurricane impacts in Gulfport (MS) and Providence (RI),” Progress in Planning, Vol.99, pp. 1-49, 2015.
  25. [25] A. H. Gharehgozli, J. Mileski, A. Adams, and W. von Zharen, “Evaluating a ‘wicked problem’: A conceptual framework on seaport resiliency in the event of weather disruptions,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol.121, pp. 65-75, 2017.
  26. [26] F. Di Maddaloni and K. Davis, “The influence of local community stakeholders in megaprojects: Rethinking their inclusiveness to improve project performance,” Int. J. of Project Management, Vol.35, No.8, pp. 1537-1556, 2017.
  27. [27] K. Ginige, D. Amaratunga, and R. Haigh, “Mapping stakeholders associated with societal challenges: a methodological framework” Procedia Engineering, Vol.212, pp. 1195-1202, 2018.
  28. [28] N. Bowie, “The moral obligations of multinational corporations,” S. Luper-Foy (Ed.), “Problems of International Justice,” pp. 97-113, Westview Press, 1988.
  29. [29] International Organization for Standardization, “Societal security – Business continuity management systems – requirements,” ISO 22301:2012, 2012.
  30. [30] H.-C. Hsu and J.-C. Lin, “Benefits beyond boundaries: A slogan or reality? A case study of Taijiang National Park in Taiwan,” Tourism Management Perspectives, Vol.6, pp. 41-52, 2013.
  31. [31] P. Parnphumeesup and S. A. Kerr, “Stakeholder preferences towards the sustainable development of CDM projects: Lessons from biomass (rice husk) CDM project in Thailand,” Energy Policy, Vol.39, No.6, pp. 3591-3601, 2011.
  32. [32] T. A. Sutherland, B. G. Cameron, and E. F. Crawley, “Program goals for the NASA/NOAA Earth Observation Program derived from a stakeholder value network analysis,” Space Policy, Vol.28, No.4, pp. 259-269, 2012.
  33. [33] R. J. Yang, “An investigation of stakeholder analysis in urban development projects: Empirical or rationalistic perspectives,” Int. J. of Project Management, Vol.32, No.5, pp. 838-849, 2014.
  34. [34] M. Caniato, T. Tudor, and M. Vaccari, “Understanding the perceptions, roles and interactions of stakeholder networks managing health-care waste: A case study of the Gaza Strip,” Waste Management, Vol.35, pp. 255-264, 2015.
  35. [35] L. Franco-Trigo, L. N. Hossain, D. Durks, D. Fam, S. C. Inglis, S. I. Benrimoj, and D. Sabater-Hernández, “Stakeholder analysis for the development of a community pharmacy service aimed at preventing cardiovascular disease,” Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, Vol.13, No.3, pp. 539-552, 2017.
  36. [36] P. Fidelman, L. S. Evans, S. Foale, C. Weible, F. von Heland, and D. Elgin, “Coalition cohesion for regional marine governance: a stakeholder analysis of the Coral Triangle Initiative,” Ocean & Coastal Management, Vol.95, pp. 117-128, 2014.
  37. [37] P. Hester, “Analyzing stakeholders using fuzzy cognitive mapping,” Procedia Computer Science, Vol.61, pp. 92-97, 2015.
  38. [38] D. Ahsan and S. Pedersen, “The influence of stakeholder groups in operation and maintenance services of offshore wind farms: Lesson from Denmark,” Renewable Energy, Vol.125, pp. 819-828, 2018.
  39. [39] A. Ahmadi, R. Kerachian, R. Rahimi, and M. J. E. Skardi, “Comparing and combining Social Network Analysis and Stakeholder Analysis for natural resource governance,” Environmental Development, Vol.32, 2019.
  40. [40] M. Rosso, M. Bottero, S. Pomarico, S. La Ferlita, and E. Comino, “Integrating multicriteria evaluation and stakeholders analysis for assessing hydropower projects,” Energy Policy, Vol.67, pp. 870-881, 2014.
  41. [41] J. Wang and T. Aenis, “Stakeholder analysis in support of sustainable land management: Experiences from southwest China,” J. of Environmental Management, Vol.243, pp. 1-11, 2019.
  42. [42] S. Sawathvong, “Experiences from developing an integrated land-use planning approach for protected areas in the Lao PDR,” Forest Policy and Economics, Vol.6, No.6, pp. 553-566, 2004.
  43. [43] D. Knowler, N. Philcox, S. Nathan, W. Delamare, W. Haider, and K. Gupta, “Assessing prospects for shrimp culture in the Indian Sundarbans: a combined simulation modelling and choice experiment approach,” Marine Policy, Vol.33, No.4, pp. 613-623, 2009.
  44. [44] J. Yu and M.-Y. Leung, “Exploring factors of preparing public engagement for large-scale development projects via a focus group study,” Int. J. of Project Management, Vol.33, No.5, pp. 1124-1135, 2015.
  45. [45] G. Cairns, I. Ahmed, J. Mullett, and G. Wright, “Scenario method and stakeholder engagement: critical reflections on a climate change scenarios case study,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol.80, No.1, pp. 1-10, 2013.
  46. [46] Y. Chang and B.-H. Lin, “Improving marine spatial planning by using an incremental amendment strategy: The case of Anping, Taiwan,” Marine Policy, Vol.68, pp. 30-38, 2016.
  47. [47] R. Wright and M. Stein, “Snowball sampling,” Encyclopedia of Social Measurement, Vol.3, pp. 495-500, 2005.
  48. [48] Z. Varvasovszky and R. Brugha, “A stakeholder analysis,” Health Policy and Planning, Vol.15, No.3, pp. 338-345, 2000.
  49. [49] F. C. Lunenburg, “Power and leadership: an influence process,” Int. J. of Management, Business, and Administration, Vol.15, No.1, pp. 1-9, 2012.
  50. [50] B. Enserink, L. Hermans, J. Kwakkel, W. Thissen, J. Koppenjan, and P. Bots, “Policy Analysis of Multi-Actor Systems,” Lemma, 2010.
  51. [51] D. R. Nurrochmat, I. A. Nugroho, Hardjanto, A. Purwadianto, A. Maryudi, and J. T. Erbaugh, “Shifting contestation into cooperation: Strategy to incorporate different interest of actors in medicinal plants in Meru Betiri National Park, Indonesia,” Forest Policy and Economics, Vol.83, pp. 162-168, 2017.
  52. [52] E. Cuppen, M. G. C. Bosch-Rekveldt, E. Pikaar, and D. C. Mehos, “Stakeholder engagement in large-scale energy infrastructure projects: Revealing perspectives using Q methodology,” Int. J. of Project Management, Vol.34, No.7, pp. 1347-1359, 2016.
  53. [53] N. Iofrida, A. I. De Luca, G. Gulisano, and A. Strano, “An application of Q-methodology to Mediterranean olive production – stakeholders’ understanding of sustainability issues,” Agricultural Systems, Vol.162, pp. 46-55, 2018.
  54. [54] G. Baffoe, “Exploring the utility of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in ranking livelihood activities for effective and sustainable rural development interventions in developing countries,” Evaluation and Program Planning, Vol.72, pp. 197-204, 2019.
  55. [55] K. Mls, R. Cimler, J. Vaščák, and M. Puheim, “Interactive evolutionary optimization of fuzzy cognitive maps,” Neurocomputing, Vol.232, pp. 58-68, 2017.
  56. [56] J. M. Vasslides and O. P. Jensen, “Fuzzy cognitive mapping in support of integrated ecosystem assessments: Developing a shared conceptual model among stakeholders,” J. of Environmental Management, Vol.166, pp. 348-356, 2016.
  57. [57] A. D. Kontogianni, E. I. Papageorgiou, and C. Tourkolias, “How do you perceive environmental change? Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping informing stakeholder analysis for environmental policy making and non-market valuation,” Applied Soft Computing, Vol.12, No.12, pp. 3725-3735, 2012.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on May. 10, 2024