JDR Vol.15 No.5 pp. 571-578
doi: 10.20965/jdr.2020.p0571


Assessment of Natural Disaster Coping Capacity from Social Capital Perspectives: A Case Study of Bangkok

Sutee Anantsuksomsri*,** and Nij Tontisirin***,†

*Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Architecture, Chulalongkorn University
254 Phayathai Road, Patumwan, Bangkok 10330, Thailand

**Regional, Urban, and Built Environmental Analytics, Faculty of Architecture, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand

***Faculty of Architecture and Planning, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand

Corresponding author

November 13, 2019
July 9, 2020
August 1, 2020
coping capacity, social capital, principal component analysis, Bangkok

Many cities and regions have recently experienced economic and environmental losses due to natural disasters. Economic losses are particularly high in urban areas where population and many economic activities are highly concentrated. Urban communities’ abilities and capacities to cope with natural disasters are essential to understand the impacts of natural disasters. Urban communities’ coping capacity is found to be closely linked to social capital of such communities. This paper aims to assess the natural disaster coping capacity of urban residents with social capital approach. The case study is Bangkok, Thailand. Using principal component analysis (PCA), the analysis shows that social cohesion, empowerment, and trust plays a key role in social capital level of Bangkok residents. Mapping social capital index at the district level suggests that urbanization may be contributable to the level of social capital.

Cite this article as:
S. Anantsuksomsri and N. Tontisirin, “Assessment of Natural Disaster Coping Capacity from Social Capital Perspectives: A Case Study of Bangkok,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.15, No.5, pp. 571-578, 2020.
Data files:
  1. [1] L. J. Wood, B. Boruff, and H. M. Smith, “When disaster communities cope and adapt: a social capital perspective,” C. D. Johnson (Ed.), “Social capital: Theory, measurement, and outcomes,” Nova Science Publisher, 2013.
  2. [2] V. R. Burkett, “Coping capacity,” P. T. Bobrowsky (Ed.), “Encyclopedia of Natural Hazards,” 2013 edition, Springer Dordrecht, doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-4399-4, 2013.
  3. [3] L. Riabova, and U. D. Skaptadóttir, “Social capital and community capacity building,” R. O. Rasmussen and N. E. Koroleva (Eds.), “Social and Environmental Impacts in the North: Methods in Evaluation of Socio-Economic and Environmental Consequences of Mining and Energy Production in the Arctic and Sub-Arctic,” pp. 437-447, Springer Dordrecht, 2003.
  4. [4] O. Patterson, F. Weil, and K. Patel, “The role of community in disaster response: conceptual models,” Population Research and Policy Review, Vol.29, No.2, pp. 127-141, 2010.
  5. [5] R. D. Putnam, R. Leonardi, and R. Nanetti, “Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy,” Princeton University Press, 1993.
  6. [6] C. Grootaert and T. van Bastelaer, “Understanding and measuring social capital: A synthesis of findings and recommendations from the social capital initiative,” Social Capital Initiative Working Paper, No.24, 2001.
  7. [7] E. Villalonga-Olives and I. Kawachi, “The measurement of social capital,” Gaceta Sanitaria, Vol.29, No.1, pp. 62-64, doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2014.09.006, 2015.
  8. [8] C. Grootaert, D. Narayan, V. N. Jones, and M. Woolcock, “Measuring Social Capital: An Integrated Questionnaire,” World Bank Working Paper, No.18, 2004.
  9. [9] M. Matsumoto and K. Madarame, “Evacuation from tsunami and social capital in Numanouchi Ward, Iwaki City,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.13, No.6, pp. 1113-1124, doi: 10.20965/jdr.2018.p1113, 2018.
  10. [10] M. Matsumoto, M. Kuri, K. Sugiyasu, Y. Jibiki, N. N. Suartini, and I. M. Budiana, “Statistical analysis of the relationship between social capital and evacuation: The case of the 2017 Mt. Agung eruption,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.13, No.6, pp. 1096-1112, doi: 10.20965/jdr.2018.p1096, 2018.
  11. [11] N. Asai, “Function of social capital embedded in religious communities at times of disaster: Cases of disaster relief activity by a muslim community and a Soka Gakkai Community in Japan,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.13, No.7, pp. 1323-1332, doi: 10.20965/jdr.2018.p1323, 2018.
  12. [12] K. Kawamoto and K. Kim, “Efficiencies of bonding, bridging and linking social capital: Cleaning up after disasters in Japan,” Int. J. of Disaster Risk Reduction, Vol.33, pp. 67–73, 2019.
  13. [13] Ministry of Interior, “2018 Population by district,” 2019, [accessed August 22, 2019]
  14. [14] Office of the National Economic and Social Development Council (NESDB), “Info/Statistic,” 2017, [accessed August 22, 2019]
  15. [15] N. Poaponsakorn and P. Meethom, “Impacts of the 2011 floods, and flood Management in Thailand,” ERIA Discussion Paper Series, No.ERIA-DP-2013-34, 2013.
  16. [16] I. Isono and S. Kumagai, “Long-run economic impacts of Thai flooding: geographical simulation analysis,” Y. Sawada and S. Oum (Eds.), “Economic and Welfare Impacts of Disasters in East Asia and Policy Responses,” ERIA Research Project Report 2011-8, pp. 401-424, ERIA, 2012.
  17. [17] J. Lever, M. Krzywinski, and N. Altman, “Principal component analysis,” Nature Methods, Vol.14, pp. 641-642, doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4346, 2017.
  18. [18] C. Bjornskov, “The multiple facets of social capital,” European J. of Political Economy, Vol.22, Issue 1, pp. 22-40, 2006.
  19. [19] F. Sabatini, “Social capital and the quality of economic development,” Kyklos, Vol.61, No.3, pp. 466-499, 2008.
  20. [20] T. A. Johannes, “Social capital and household welfare in Cameroon: A multidimensional analysis,” African Economic research Consortium (AERC) Research Paper, Article No.238, 2011.
  21. [21] N. Saukani and N. A. Ismail, “Identifying the components of social capital by Categorical Principal Component Analysis (CATPCA),” Social Indicator Research, Vol.141, pp. 631-655, 2019.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Dec. 03, 2020